⊹₊˚‧︵‿₊୨ᰔ୧₊‿︵‧˚₊⊹⊹₊˚‧︵‿₊୨ ᛝ Дᴀʙнᴏ хᴏᴛᴇᴧ нᴀйᴛи ᴄᴛиᴋᴇᴩы ᴄ ᴛᴀᴋᴏй иᴦᴩᴏй ᴋᴀᴋ Aniʍᴀl hᴏsᴩiᴛᴀl?? Пᴏɜдᴩᴀʙᴧяю, ᴛы нᴀхᴏдиɯьᴄя ᴨᴩяʍᴏ у цᴇᴧи! Vᴇlᴄᴏʍ ᴛᴏ ᴧᴀᴩёᴋ ʍᴇдᴄᴇᴄᴛᴩы!!(。>‿‿<。) • 𑀝ᴛᥙκᥱρы ᥴ᧐ ʙᥴᥱⲙᥙ ᥰᥱρᥴ᧐нᥲжᥲⲙᥙ ᥲн᧐ⲙᥲ᧘ᥙяⲙᥙ (ㆁωㆁ) • Д᧐δρᥲя ᥲдⲙᥙнᥙᥴᴛρᥲцᥙя (≧∇≦) • В᧐ᤋⲙ᧐жн᧐ᥴᴛь ᥴᴛᥲᴛь ᥴᴛᥙκᥱρ᧐дᥱ᧘᧐ⲙ (☆▽☆) Нᴀдᴇюᴄь ᴛᴇбᴇ ᴨᴏнᴩᴀʙиᴛᴄя ᴨᴏᴋ!! ♡⃪ᩙ፝
![Telegram profile photo for НАБОР В АДМ 𝐀𝐳𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 [𝐃𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐘 IDK + ᴄᴏɴғᴇssɪᴏɴ]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/b6/b679b3dacc7595bcaa58fafba2914a0fd2814837bc72ecd7dcf3e4866216d76d.jpg)
Channel
НАБОР В АДМ 𝐀𝐳𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 [𝐃𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐘 IDK + ᴄᴏɴғᴇssɪᴏɴ]
@Azure_TimeFan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
182subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003777160498 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Azure_TimeFan |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Azure_TimeFan |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 182 | +15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 167 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 160 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 158 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 158 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 36.9%
- avg views ÷ 182 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 67.1
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.76%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (18 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 470 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
85 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 32.9% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 27.1% | |
| custom 5435956238997283574 | 7 | 8.24% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 8.24% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 8.24% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 7.06% | |
| custom 5436046699598474709 | 4 | 4.71% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 3.53% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Оке оке только Азур к сожалению Тгк https://t.me/KOSTRULYA228 Буду рада если посмотрите мои другие арты:D
🔥2
🖤~𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙋𝙤𝙨𝙩~🪻 [Фоли что-то запостила, ПРОСЫПАЕМСЯ!] 🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪 𝙋0𝙨𝙩 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢🪻: Фоли (@MyRatthew) •┈┈┈•┈┈┈•┈┈┈ 𝙃4𝙖𝙨𝙝𝙏4𝙜𝙯🌀: #АЗУРТАЙМЫКАНОН / #Азуртайм / #Azuretime •┈┈┈•┈┈┈•┈┈┈ 𝑨𝒛𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝑫𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏
❤4❤🔥3
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ☆•√|Welcome to ... α |√•☆ ૪ •°^√ Азур&ТуТайм blog √^°• ૪ ✎ Хотите понаблюдать за персонажами ,но не можете найти блог, тогда тебе к нам! ✐—————————————————✎✐ P.S. Здесь описываются действия и их слова ,сами персонажи не ведут блог,а живут жизнью! ⌑ ——————· ━ · ─ ⟡ ─ · ━ ·———— ⌑ !|√°• ⌑ ⌑ ———————————————————— ⌑ ᯾ Анонка_Тутайма-@TW0oT1MEbot ˖𓍯 ᯾ Анонка_Азура ˖𓍯 °Сапп_ТуТайма -⭕/ //° ⌑ °Сапп_Азура-🌺/🛡️° …
🖤~𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙋𝙤𝙨𝙩~🪻 [Опять влд ничего не постит...] 🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪 𝙋0𝙨𝙩 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢🪻: Фоли 𝙃4𝙖𝙨𝙝𝙏4𝙜𝙯🌀: #АЗУРТАЙМЫКАНОН / #Азуртайм / #Azuretime 𝑨𝒛𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝑫𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏
❤4
🖤~𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙋𝙤𝙨𝙩~🥀 [Влд решил занятся активом] 🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪 𝙋0𝙨𝙩 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢🪻: Фоли💊 𝙃4𝙖𝙨𝙝𝙏4𝙜𝙯🌀: #Азуртайм / #Azuretime / #АЗУРТАЙМЫКАНОН 𝑨𝒛𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝑫𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏
❤2🔥2
🖤~𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙋𝙤𝙨𝙩~🥀 [...] 🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪 𝙋0𝙨𝙩 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢🪻: Фоли💊 𝙃4𝙖𝙨𝙝𝙏4𝙜𝙯🌀: #Азур / #Azure 𝑨𝒛𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝑫𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏
❤4💘2custom 54360466995984747092
🖤~𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙋𝙤𝙨𝙩~🪻 [Парные авы😉] 🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪 𝙋0𝙨𝙩 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢🪻: Фоли 𝙃4𝙖𝙨𝙝𝙏4𝙜𝙯🌀: #Азуртайм / #Azuretime 𝑨𝒛𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝑫𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏
❤5
🌈ОФОРМА ТЕЙКОВ! #Тейк /\ @AzureTTtake_bot
❤2🥰2
Твкв: обнажённый ТОРС, НЕ ПОРНО! —оо, да уже 3 этап ^_^ У меня скоро др мяу Тгк: https://t.me/ZomBieeeX3
❤2🔥2
🖤~𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙋𝙤𝙨𝙩~🥀 [Азур завтрак 😋😋всем споке ноке] 🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪 𝙋0𝙨𝙩 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢🪻: ФольнаяЭклипс 𝙃4𝙖𝙨𝙝𝙏4𝙜𝙯🌀: #Азуртаймыканон 𝑨𝒛𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝑫𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏
🔥4❤3
🖤~𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙋𝙤𝙨𝙩~🥀 [Кущайте актив😚] 🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪🗡🔪 𝙋0𝙨𝙩 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢🪻: Фоли 𝙃4𝙖𝙨𝙝𝙏4𝙜𝙯🌀: #Азуртайм / #Azuretime 𝑨𝒛𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝑫𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏
🔥7🥰4❤2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Azure_TimeFan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Делать набор в админы?
- 🥺73%
- 🥺27%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 263,545 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@ARdailycf · 471 post𝙀𝙙𝙞𝙩𝙁𝙡𝙤𝙬
@editflow112 · 91 postENA VRChat
@ENAVRChat · 1431 post𝚐𝚒𝚛𝚕'𝚜 𝙼𝙰𝚃𝙷
@g1rlsmath · 161 post[НАБОР В АДМИНЫ] ⲙⲉⳑғⲓ ⲓⲛ ⲥυⲧⲉ ⲏⲟυsⲉ |ᵈʷ
@Melfi_games · 2901 post×ꇙꉣꋬꅐꋊ ʙʟᴏɢɢ
@spawnblog · 531 post(рест)𝔖𝔴𝔞𝔭.𝔙𝔢𝔢𝔯𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔠𝔞 𝔟𝔩𝔬𝔤
@SwapVeeronika_Blog · 211 post𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗧𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻
@TheTolerantMeet · 141 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ARdailycf · 471 post𝙀𝙙𝙞𝙩𝙁𝙡𝙤𝙬
@editflow112 · 91 postENA VRChat
@ENAVRChat · 1431 post𝚐𝚒𝚛𝚕'𝚜 𝙼𝙰𝚃𝙷
@g1rlsmath · 161 post[НАБОР В АДМИНЫ] ⲙⲉⳑғⲓ ⲓⲛ ⲥυⲧⲉ ⲏⲟυsⲉ |ᵈʷ
@Melfi_games · 2901 post×ꇙꉣꋬꅐꋊ ʙʟᴏɢɢ
@spawnblog · 531 post(рест)𝔖𝔴𝔞𝔭.𝔙𝔢𝔢𝔯𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔠𝔞 𝔟𝔩𝔬𝔤
@SwapVeeronika_Blog · 211 post𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗧𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻
@TheTolerantMeet · 141 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НАБОР В АДМ 𝐀𝐳𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 [𝐃𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐘 IDK + ᴄᴏɴғᴇssɪᴏɴ]” (@Azure_TimeFan), 182 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Azure_TimeFan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.