Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BABA๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ

Channel

BABA๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ

@BABAsoonBACK

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

1,070subscribers

+167 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002180036167
TypeChannel
Username@BABAsoonBACK
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BABAsoonBACK

Growth

9031,074988.56 August 2026 โ€” 903 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 903 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 906 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 1,019 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 1,001 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 1,021 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 1,011 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 1,074 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 1,070 subscribers1,0706 August 202631 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 25 days, net +167. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 877โ€“1,100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 19:281,070-4
29 Aug 2026, 03:341,074+63
25 Aug 2026, 17:321,011-10
22 Aug 2026, 13:241,021+20
19 Aug 2026, 02:451,001-18
15 Aug 2026, 18:341,019+113
7 Aug 2026, 09:20906+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:30903no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:18903first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
35.0%
avg views รท 1,070 subscribers
Avg views / post
374
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.81%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (29 July 2026 โ€“ 6 August 2026)
Views total1,497
Reactions total72
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

148 reactions across 14 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค3020.3%
๐Ÿคฃ2416.2%
๐Ÿ’‹149.46%
๐Ÿฅฐ138.78%
๐Ÿ’ฏ128.11%
๐Ÿ•Š117.43%
๐Ÿ—ฟ106.76%
๐Ÿ†42.70%
๐Ÿคก42.70%
โšก32.03%
๐Ÿ”ฅ32.03%
customย 544503253568588138921.35%
๐Ÿ‘21.35%
๐Ÿ‘พ21.35%
๐Ÿค“21.35%
๐Ÿคช21.35%
๐Ÿ†’10.676%
๐ŸŒ10.676%
๐ŸŽ‰10.676%
๐Ÿณ10.676%
6 further kinds64.05%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 16 we hold a reading for ยท 19%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @BABAsoonBACK. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC172 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

VS RESSON ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 2-0 ะดะปั ะฐะบั‚ะธะฒ BABA โœˆ๏ธ

๐Ÿ’‹4๐Ÿ’ฏ3๐Ÿฅฐ3๐Ÿ‘พ2๐Ÿคช2customย 54450325356858813892โค1๐ŸŽ‰1

6 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC394 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

VS CLOUD ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ 4-0 n5 my 666 BABA

โค6๐Ÿ’‹2๐Ÿ•Š2๐Ÿ—ฟ2๐Ÿณ1๐Ÿ‘ป1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿคฉ1

5 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC374 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

VS NEFO ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ 1-0 n3 world by MADNES BABA

๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿ•Š1๐Ÿ—ฟ1๐Ÿฅฐ1

4 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC557 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

VS WALKERS ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ dastoyni tip v cis BABA

โค8๐Ÿคฃ6๐Ÿคก4๐Ÿ†2๐Ÿ’‹2๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ—ฟ2โšก1

3 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC490 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

BABA๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ โ˜•

โค2

3 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC541 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

VS IMP ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ n5 by madnes BABA

๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿ—ฟ2๐Ÿฅฐ2

3 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC452 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

VS SHAH ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ 2-0 Top by madnes BABA

๐Ÿ’‹1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿฅฐ1

3 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC465 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

VS SLAIZER ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ top by gator for active BABA

1 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC392 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @fearlesorganizationPhoto

TOP 10 MOBILE PLAYERS 2026๐ŸŒŽ 1) LOVEMEE๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ|CLOSEFIGHT๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ| GENERAL๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ AMRICY๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ| KANPU๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ 2) BABA๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ| MATTI๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ| MESSI๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ 3) MONEYKEN๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ| EXCLUSIVE๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ 4) FROZEN๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด| TOHAMY๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ 5) JABL๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ| CLOUD๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ 6) CRAX๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง| ILZI๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ 7) MJ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด| ALOK๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง 8) BRAZILY๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ | VINI๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ 9) NAH๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ 10) Vacantโœ๏ธ

๐Ÿคฃ16โค5๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿ•Š1๐Ÿ—ฟ1๐Ÿฅฐ1

1 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC310 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @dangerpubgmorgPhoto

TOP 10 MOBILE PLAYERS 2026 ๐ŸŒŽ ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ DANGER ORG ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ #1) GENERAL๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ | AMRICY๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ KANPUU๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ | STRONGMAN๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ #2) MONEYKEN๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ | ARASO๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ #3) KEEF๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น | TOHAMY๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ #4) MJ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด | BABA๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ #5) CLOUD๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ #6) FRIZIEL๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง #7) CLOUD๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง #8) ALOK๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง | GOTOHELL๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท #9) VINI๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ #10) ASD๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ ๐Ÿ›ก DANGER TDM ORG ๐Ÿ›ก

๐Ÿคฃ2๐Ÿ’‹1๐Ÿ•Š1๐Ÿฅฐ1

31 Jul 2026, 22:47 UTC504 views3 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

VS ZERON ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ 2-0 BABA

๐Ÿ’‹1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿ•Š1

31 Jul 2026, 19:49 UTC761 views9 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

VS SST 7AKM ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ 1-0 N2 WORLD BY MADNES BABA

โค2โšก1๐ŸŒ1๐Ÿ’‹1๐Ÿ•Š1๐Ÿ—ฟ1๐Ÿค“1๐Ÿฅฐ1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @BABAsoonBACK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œBABA๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟโ€ (@BABAsoonBACK), 1,070 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BABAsoonBACK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.