Channel
@BARSKAdsgn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
59subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001881725670 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BARSKAdsgn |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BARSKAdsgn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:54 | 59 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 58 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 57 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 57 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 6 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
39 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5357334118159883232 | 16 | 41.0% | |
| custom 5359581378193138129 | 11 | 28.2% | |
| custom 5384602947126567429 | 6 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5400200571833556442 | 6 | 15.4% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Та-дааа. ✨ Мой профессиональный сайт! ✨ Пока что на сервере чужом, но уже рабочий. Портфолио надо будет загрузить и всеу. Можно уже чекать ➡️ barska-studio.vercel.app ⬅️ Принимаются сообщения о багах и всяких ошибках, в целом отзывы - насколько оно вам вообще все это прикольно и понятно. Это mvp, конечно, поэтому будет еще дорабатываться. Открыта к идеям ☺️
custom 53573341181598832323custom 53846029471265674292
Сколько раз уже я видела красивущие сайты и клевые продукты, но все сделано с помощью нейросети и это никак не попытались скрыть. Для меня это скорее всего показатель пренебрежения к пользователям. Ну или пренебрежение исполнителей к своему заказчику, потому что не позаботились о tone of voice, о том как это будет считываться аудиторией. Или даже нежелание потратить время и ресурс на написание хороших текстов с марке…
custom 54002005718335564421
Честно, как есть. Вайбкодинг это тоже своеобразный за*б. Да, можно прописать скилы. Но они решат только небольшую часть проблем при создании сайта. Все равно многое быстрее собирать в конструкторе. Если хочется свой родненький сайт на хтмл, то, конечно, тут есть смысл повозиться. В нейронке это будет быстрее и продуктивнее, чем писать код с нуля. Однако я бы не стала продавать сайты, сделанные в нейронке, дешевле. Вс…
custom 53595813781931381293custom 53573341181598832322custom 54002005718335564422
А в нашем коворкинге случился рост! Теперь можно делать красивучие сайты и приложения без ограничивающего возможности конструктора, на чистом коде. То что нужно, если хочется полной свободы, плавности, меньше багов и полной независимости от посредников. MVP готовится на сверх скорости - вы можете увидеть пробную рабочую версию в рамках недели или даже в течение дня. Это дорого, но закладывает прочный фундамент на буд…
custom 53595813781931381292
Брендинг — не просто «красивая картинка», а часть грамотного планирования. Если ваша цель — «срубить» денег на разовой акции и не отсвечивать, брендинг вам не нужен. Хватит любого простого дизайна. Но если вы планируете работать годами, просто дешевая реклама станет для вас слишком дорогой. Почему работать без системы — это убытки в долгую: 🌀Дизайнер каждый раз «изобретает велосипед» Без правил каждый макет рисуетс…
custom 54002005718335564423custom 53595813781931381291
Подборка обворожительных премиум-упаковок для вдохновения.
custom 53595813781931381294custom 53573341181598832322custom 53846029471265674292
Пополнение моего портфолио на бехансе небольшим кейсом. Не могу вот понять - делать на английском или на русском? Или завести еще один акк на английском? 🤔 По ссылке описание и подробности https://www.behance.net/gallery/231708137/premialnye-sertifikaty
custom 53573341181598832324custom 53846029471265674292custom 53595813781931381291
🧐
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Пиратка с мусорной планеты или учёный? 🤔
custom 53573341181598832325
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @BARSKAdsgn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🧐
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BARSKA | про дизайн” (@BARSKAdsgn), 59 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BARSKAdsgn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.