Channel
@BC216
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
42,172subscribers
+3,517 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002596824039 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BC216 |
| Description | 投稿发布 删帖联系 @tougaoo 频道出售有需要联系 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BC216 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:09 | 42,172 | -55 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:05 | 42,227 | -36 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:18 | 42,263 | -59 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:59 | 42,322 | -83 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:56 | 42,405 | -30 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 42,435 | -73 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:10 | 42,508 | -75 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 42,583 | -72 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 42,655 | -49 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:29 | 42,704 | -38 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:11 | 42,742 | -42 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 42,784 | -76 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:35 | 42,860 | -80 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:57 | 42,940 | -482 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:45 | 43,422 | -971 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:48 | 44,393 | -42 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 44,435 | -31 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 44,466 | -32 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:31 | 44,498 | -15 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 02:10 | 44,513 | first reading |
800 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 174 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 258 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 800 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 186,641 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 199 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 800 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 800 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 800 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 259 posts held from the last 30 days (1.93%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
苹果最新版本也会无感被盗u了吗 Calif 团队发布了现代时代最强大的 jailbreak 漏洞综述，该漏洞不受限制，意思是即使你关掉手机，jailbreak 仍然有效，即使 iOS 发布了新更新，你可以更新，jailbreak 仍然有效 预计该漏洞将在几周内发布，而且该漏洞也是真实的 而且 Dopamine jailbreak 开发者声明，该漏洞可能在漏洞发布后立即用于 Dopamine，而且视频包含漏洞 + 完整不受限制的 jailbreak，适用于最新版本和最新设备，意思是旧时代 jailbreak 的时代可能很快回归
高加索暗流：亚美尼亚与格鲁吉亚，正在崛起的跨境电诈新据点 当东南亚多国持续高压清剿电信网络诈骗、网赌灰产之后，跨国犯罪集团开启新一轮迁徙。地处南高加索的格鲁吉亚、亚美尼亚，凭借独特的地缘位置、博彩法律漏洞、宽松金融环境与签证便利，逐步成为跨境电信诈骗、虚假博彩、杀猪盘、虚假投资盘的新兴大本营，正在上演东南亚电诈园区曾经走过的老路。 一、两地电诈业态：模式分化，目标市场清晰 格鲁吉亚和亚美尼亚的诈骗窝点，并非简单复刻缅北“封闭式园区”，而是演化成两种不同的运营形态。 格鲁吉亚：呼叫中心模式为主，混合网赌视讯盘 格鲁吉亚本土允许合法博彩，线上博彩牌照制度存在监管盲区。很多团伙以正规呼叫中心、科技公司、游戏推广公司作为外壳，在第比利斯、巴统等城市写字楼、酒店内设立窝点，隐蔽性极强。 国际调查组织OCCRP曾经曝光位于第比利斯、距离格鲁吉亚国家安全部门不远的AK Group诈骗呼叫中心。短短三年时间，从全球六千多名受害者身上骗取…
回国半年多后被逮捕追诉 #网友投稿 我一个亲戚从马来西亚回国有半年多了，以前受他的邀请还去过马来西亚找他玩。他在那边的工作是待在家里面搞直播的，看他的样子不仅工作很轻松惬意赚钱又多当时都很羡慕他😬。 就在前不久他突然被我们市公安局的警察逮捕了，后面据我们这些亲戚了解他在马来西亚搞的是网络赌博拉客直播，他拉的赌博客都是中国内地的老百姓，这在中国是属于严重的犯罪行为。 他在马来西亚搞的这份直播拉赌客工作有1年零3个月的时间，除了他平时在外的开支还赚了30多万人民币带回来。他对他的这份工作其实有意识到这是在犯罪，但回国已经有半年多没有警察来盘查逮捕他，他就以为这个事情人不知鬼不觉的过去了。 殊不知国内的警察对从国外回来搞过违法犯罪工作的人都会倒查追诉，不要说是已经过去半年多哪怕是2至3年前的事情查出来后同样的跑不掉。 警察念我亲戚是初犯又积极的配合他们的工作退了赃款32万多人民币，在回国的这半年多时间内也没有再从事过违法犯罪…
越南抓包现场！大哥：我就静静看你们演🤣 笑不活了家人们！越南这大哥心态直接封神😂 老婆在车里不对劲，当场抓包！ 结果 —— 不吵不闹不拍窗，背手一站，像看免费大戏似的🤣 主打一个：别紧张，你们继续，我顺便学两招
币安刚刚发布了初步调查报告，梳理了他们是如何被朝鲜黑客，盗取了 60 多亿美金。 某位币安软件工程师，在求职网站上挂着简历，结果一位自称项目总监的人，主动联系他，说有个潜在岗位想聊聊。 对方安排了一位 HR 跟他视频面试，真人露脸。为了让他放下戒心，这位 HR 还把自己的社交账号发给了他，上面有他本人的生活照和视频，看着就像真实存在的人。 然后到了第二轮面试，对方换到一个常用的聊天软件上，跟一位自称是这家公司 CEO 的人聊，但其实公司是假的。 等面试快结束时，对方让他下载一份代码题，作为技术测试，结果这位币安员工，在工作电脑上下载运行了它。 这份代码，在安装环节偷偷自动执行，把电脑上一个正常的开发工具 pyenv，换成了带木马的版本，然后跟黑客的服务器连上，还会自己清理痕迹。 就连币安当时的杀毒软件，也没查出来。 从这台电脑开始，朝鲜黑客一步步渗透内部，摸进了交易所的钱包系统，一个多月后币安被盗了 60 多亿美金…
#网友投稿 #曝光杀猪盘 #乐邦体育 #黑款5966 前几个月狗代介绍来到这个叫乐邦体育玩，打的百家乐，刚开始玩输赢不大，也都正常出款了，昨天和今天一直在玩，处于盈利状态，玩了几个月赢利了一万来块吧，结果在今天凌晨充值5000提现5966一直不到账，问客服就是审核，问狗代就是无了，玩的乐邦百家乐和买的pg电子乐邦电子免费游戏，垃圾平台，还好没充值多
#网友投稿：迪拜越南炮房名媛会所，因内部女孩子长期吸毒贩毒再次被抓，总共抓了30个左右越南妹子，全是大长腿。
#斯里兰卡新闻 斯里兰卡电诈黑产失控，前高官急了：港口城不是犯罪避风港！ 前议长卡鲁·贾亚苏里亚（Karu Jayasuriya）发出警告，称斯里兰卡面临成为大型国际网络诈骗枢纽的风险，并对今年虽有上千人被捕但仍未能成功起诉任何犯罪嫌疑人表示关切。 贾亚苏里亚在社交媒体平台X上发文指出，他引用了《星期日泰晤士报》（Sunday Times）的一项调查报道。该调查透露，2026年1月至9月期间，斯里兰卡警方在对全国27处涉嫌网络诈骗的窝点展开突击搜查时，共逮捕了1093人。 然而，警方也承认，目前尚未对任何被指控在斯里兰卡从事国际网络诈骗的嫌疑人成功实施起诉。 贾亚苏里亚警告说，国际专家已对斯里兰卡正在演变成工业化规模的网络犯罪中心表示担忧。 在谈及科伦坡港口城项目时，他表示，斯里兰卡本应致力于成为一个值得信赖的区域金融中心，而不是吸引犯罪网络聚集。“这绝非港口城所承诺的枢纽，”贾亚苏里亚说道。 他强调，区域金融中心必…
#柬埔寨资讯：关闭86个大型网络诈骗中心 柬埔寨一名高级官员表示，当局已关闭全国86个大型网络诈骗窝点，并在该国确认了约97个有组织犯罪网络。 据11月2日报道，柬埔寨国务大臣蔡西那烈（Chhay Sinarith）透露，在正在推进的网络诈骗专项打击行动中，当局已接管并关闭了全国86个大型网络诈骗窝点，并逮捕了5,778名嫌疑人。 蔡西那烈系负责专项任务的国务大臣，兼任柬埔寨国家打击网络诈骗委员会（CCOS）秘书处负责人。 他表示，随着相关部门持续深入调查，已有529起案件移送法院审理。调查重点针对有组织犯罪网络、诈骗活动、非法拘禁与酷刑、诱骗招募人员进入诈骗窝点以及洗钱犯罪等行为。 执法部门已在柬埔寨境内确认约97个以合法企业为掩护、从事网络诈骗和洗钱活动的有组织犯罪网络。此外，还在境外发现了约100个相关犯罪团伙。 据他介绍，尽管部分地区仍零星出现较小规模的诈骗活动，但此次专项打击行动已使整体局势得到了有效控制。…
#群友爆料：群亿酒店卷房费跑路，9楼暗藏打野窝点。 昨天，酒店群内发布通知，说酒店内部矛盾，房子将被本地房东收回，晚上6点断电，第二天一早会通知宪兵来一层层清场。前管理人员联系不上，意思就是让我们租户自己想办法。 经过几个小时群友扯皮，管理人员跳出来说可以正常入住，说什么退房费，一下说这个跑路，那个跑路的，一下说发地址安排退房费。等我们新的房间找好了，凌晨发通知说更换到新的酒店，这个月免费住，换到双狮八闽酒店。 纯粹把租户当成傻子，玩瞒天过海，还说自己的是什么江苏商会旗下的。就这样的格局，真给你们江苏商会丢脸。 9楼很明显就是办公室布局，都看见有金融分析师进去了，问你们还说绝对没有。钱不多，送给你们了。出来这么多年了，见过的事情也不少，第一次遇见这样恶心人的事。 避坑这两家酒店！这样的环境，既然你们想要这样玩，那就慢慢陪你们玩。行情不好，真的是中国人专骗中国人。
淘宝泰国公司董事被抓！ 11月2日，泰媒披露泰国中央调查局在曼谷逮捕了“淘宝（泰国）有限公司”38岁泰籍授权董事帕林。警方调查显示，该公司在无相关金融牌照的情况下，通过Fupay和Taobao Thailand网站违规提供人民币兑换、支付宝转账及跨境汇款服务。 经泰国央行提供线索排查，与该业务关联的5个银行账户一年内累计资金流水超过1.7亿泰铢，其中两个账户与网络犯罪账户存在关联，涉案金额超27万泰铢。11月1日，警方搜查了相关办公地点并查获电脑、手机等证据。 目前，嫌疑人已因涉嫌无证经营受监管支付与外汇业务被捕，案件仍在进一步调查中。 马云要不要出面～～😄
#小姐姐投稿：姐妹们，和“欧巴”交往一定要仔细查清楚！小心遇到韩国“杀猪盘”/诈骗犯欧巴。 近来有很多韩国欧巴来到越南，通过电话从事诈骗活动。韩国警方近期已与越南方面紧密合作，连续破获了多个此类犯罪组织。 为了瞒过当地居民，他们上班时通常会穿着整齐的西装，扮作企业家或上班族。 照片来源：韩国 MBC 电视台新闻专题报道（211月1日）胡志明市警方突袭了该韩国诈骗团伙的窝点，共有 54 名成员被捕
Showing the 12 most recent of 800 posts we hold for @BC216. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚黑平台/曝光” (@BC216), 42,172 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BC216.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.