Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BELGER

Channel

BELGER

@BELGERprecision

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

347subscribers

+92 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003005423850
TypeChannel
Username@BELGERprecision
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BELGERprecision

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2553473017 August 2026 — 255 subscribers8 August 2026 — 255 subscribers15 August 2026 — 270 subscribers21 August 2026 — 275 subscribers28 August 2026 — 282 subscribers4 September 2026 — 286 subscribers11 September 2026 — 347 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 35 days, net +92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 241–361 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 21:22347+61
4 Sept 2026, 00:38286+4
28 Aug 2026, 13:15282+7
21 Aug 2026, 05:03275+5
15 Aug 2026, 00:27270+15
8 Aug 2026, 09:18255no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:06255first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 26s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3751.4%
🔥2230.6%
811.1%
👏56.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC171 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дорогие читатели, состоялся интересный разговор с моим другом. У него интересная судьба и не менее интересный канал в ТГ. Затронули такие темы как подготовка стрелков, психология выстрела и многое другое. Чуть позже выйдет вторая часть нашего диалога. Приятного просмотра https://t.me/psycho_dinamica/70

👍4👏3🔥21

2 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC274 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Проект бюджетный ЕЛР винтовки на базе Орсис продолжается. Выполнен небольшой апгрейд: 1) установлен дтк fat bastard, который мне сделал друг Роман и тюнер, который мне сделал друг Вадим. Отдача отличается от штатного дтк в лучшую сторону. Покрутил немного тюнер. Пока вывод один: он работает. 2) установлен регулируемый бегрэйдер с использованием штатного приклада. Очень удобно. 3) лоток-подаватель вместо магазина. 4)

🔥11👍1👏1

17 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC347 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Проверка оптики. Было предположение, что прицел может иметь недостоверные поправки, ибо БК кажется нереалистичным. Итак мы в компании снайперов поехали проверить оптику. Для этого нужно иметь специальным образом размеченную мишень (стрелять по ней не надо). Мишень можно сделать самостоятельно из "миллиметровки", закрасив на ней контрастным цветом квадраты размером 2*2, 5*5, либо 10*10 см. Устанавливаем мишень на

🔥5👍43

14 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC287 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👁Для любого человека зрение - это до 90% информации об окружающем мире. Для стрелка, это пожалуй самый важный орган. Даже среди паралимпийских спортсменов нет слепых стрелков. На всяких периодических профосмотрах и диспансеризациях проверка зрения почти всегда оканчивается: "жалоб нет" и "кншиыби". Но для стрелка и снайпера критически важно проходить полный ТО глаз (внутриглазное давление, состояние сетчатки, хруст

4👍3

12 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC305 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Несмотря на дождь выехали пострелять. Желание было по-быстрому "нащупать" более-менее кучную навеску и "обнулить" прицел. Заодно посмотреть фактическое падение новой пули на имеющихся дистанциях. Коротко. Фото 1. Мишень на 100м. Одну группу раскидало по моей вине: сошки ушли с коврика на бетон, я не заметил вовремя. Остановился на 925 м/с пулей 293 грана (102.5 гран иглы 575), правая группа. Фото 2. Проверка паде

👍8

9 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC303 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Олег возобновил участие в тестировании тренировочных пуль для 300 норма магнум.👍

👍2

9 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC291 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Спокойствие! Оказалось, это норма для 338. Из комментариев стрелков в чатах: "У меня новый ствол выглядел хуже" "Тут далеко до разгара" Принято решение "топить по полной"🤙 В планах по-быстрому подобрать навеску и сделать прострел для проверки БК. "По взрослому" всё будет после нового более жесткого шасси, более эффективного ДТК.😎

👏1

8 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC297 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"Почему я первый месяц мучился?" Уважаемый радиослушатель! Пока я делал обкатку в несколько выездов, у меня не получалось попасть в мишень. Совсем.😱 Грешил на всё, что только можно: срыв пули с нарезов, касание дтк, плохой беддинг, плохой стрелок, магнитные бури, парад планет. После анализа оказалось, что зазор между стволом и ложе недостаточный, и ствол касался во время выстрела шасси.📏 Переделал беддинг, припод

👍6

8 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC285 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Поднимался вопрос чистки.🦝 Ствол обкатан.✨ На фото патчи после одной чистки, общее время на которую заняло минут 30-40.⏳ На видео результат. Да, он не идеален, можно еще пару патчей потратить на несколько мелких жёлтых полосок. Признаюсь, первая чистка после КО заняла весь вечер и потребовала примерно 300 патчей. 😵 Кстати, на видео в самом начале можно разглядеть начинающуюся сетку разгара. Она ещё не критична, и

👍9🔥4

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @BELGERprecision. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BELGER” (@BELGERprecision), 347 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BELGERprecision.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.