Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bitcoin Hotel OFFIZIELL

Channel

Bitcoin Hotel OFFIZIELL

@BITCOINHOTEL_Admin

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

67,822subscribers

+27,319 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002282805256
TypeChannel
Username@BITCOINHOTEL_Admin
Descriptionhttps://x.com/bitcoin_hotel?s=21 https://youtube.com/@bitcoin-hotel?si=4qVJHlalnjvqQ6sa https://youtube.com/@marcguilliard?si=SFgu3k8lo-S7NvNG Wir machen Bitcoin-Bildung und ihr das erste Bitcoin-Hotel der Welt [email protected]
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BITCOINHOTEL_Admin

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 33% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

13.7 average views per post against 67,822 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.02%. Across the 24,202 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,996 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.60% and 15.0%, with a median of 6.80%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (30 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Posts measured429 of 429 published in the window (429 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled5,893
Mature posts only0.032% over 105 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers67,822 measured 26 September 2026
Cohortb31623 · 24,202 channels · p10 0.813% · p25 2.60% · p50 6.80% · p75 15.0% · p90 27.5%
Position in cohort0.310th percentile · 1/333 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.043% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageGerman · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 29 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

35,41775,52155,4697 August 2026 — 40,503 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,483 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,413 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,371 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,212 subscribers12 August 2026 — 38,113 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,422 subscribers15 August 2026 — 36,355 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,417 subscribers17 August 2026 — 75,521 subscribers18 August 2026 — 74,649 subscribers19 August 2026 — 73,623 subscribers20 August 2026 — 73,455 subscribers21 August 2026 — 73,144 subscribers22 August 2026 — 70,879 subscribers24 August 2026 — 70,829 subscribers25 August 2026 — 70,758 subscribers26 August 2026 — 70,697 subscribers27 August 2026 — 70,659 subscribers28 August 2026 — 70,630 subscribers29 August 2026 — 70,572 subscribers30 August 2026 — 70,517 subscribers31 August 2026 — 70,424 subscribers1 September 2026 — 70,350 subscribers2 September 2026 — 70,300 subscribers4 September 2026 — 69,897 subscribers6 September 2026 — 69,450 subscribers9 September 2026 — 68,574 subscribers11 September 2026 — 68,462 subscribers13 September 2026 — 68,374 subscribers15 September 2026 — 68,261 subscribers17 September 2026 — 68,122 subscribers19 September 2026 — 68,049 subscribers26 September 2026 — 67,822 subscribers67,8227 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +27,319. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,401–81,537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 08:5567,822-227
19 Sept 2026, 07:5968,049-73
17 Sept 2026, 00:2168,122-139
15 Sept 2026, 02:4068,261-113
13 Sept 2026, 14:4168,374-88
11 Sept 2026, 21:1568,462-112
9 Sept 2026, 12:1968,574-876
6 Sept 2026, 06:2069,450-447
4 Sept 2026, 01:2069,897-403
2 Sept 2026, 12:4770,300-50
1 Sept 2026, 10:3770,350-74
31 Aug 2026, 12:5470,424-93
30 Aug 2026, 14:2470,517-55
29 Aug 2026, 13:3370,572-58
28 Aug 2026, 10:4670,630-29
27 Aug 2026, 13:5370,659-38
26 Aug 2026, 12:1470,697-61
25 Aug 2026, 09:4870,758-71
24 Aug 2026, 10:3470,829-50
22 Aug 2026, 20:4370,879first reading

Engagement

781 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.02%
avg views ÷ 67,822 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.7
429 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
429
of 781 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 147 of 429 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held781 (6 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total5,893
Reactions total291
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 14:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,800
Videos
≈1,520
Links
≈7,680

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5h 59m
Average length
4m 17s

Measured directly from 84 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,102 reactions across 373 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19117.3%
🎉14112.8%
👍14112.8%
👏11510.4%
🔥1079.71%
💯807.26%
🥰665.99%
🏆474.26%
❤‍🔥343.09%
🤝332.99%
🍾232.09%
🤩191.72%
😁161.45%
🐳151.36%
👌110.998%
😨80.726%
😎70.635%
🙏70.635%
🤗60.544%
😱50.454%
17 further kinds302.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 374 of the 781 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 781 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 09:53 UTC11 viewsread 29 September 2026

HERZLICHEN GLÜCKWUNSCH🍾🍾 Das Glück und die Zufriedenheit meiner Investoren haben für mich immer oberste Priorität. Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback, liebe Mitglieder. Neue Investoren sind jederzeit herzlich willkommen, sich unseren Investmentservices anzuschließen. Um loszulegen, senden Sie mir eine Nachricht. Stellen Sie Fragen und ich werde zu gegebener Zeit antworten. Klicken Sie hier, um eine Nachricht zu senden: …

29 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC13 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Guten Morgen, Bitcoin-Fans! Ich wünsche euch allen einen schönen Dienstag 🤝... Völs hat gerade mit 100.000 Euro ✅️ seine Reise in die Welt der Krypto-Investitionen begonnen. Melde dich erst, wenn deine Bitcoin-Wallet bereit und mit Guthaben aufgeladen ist. Auch du kannst an meinen Trades teilnehmen! Sende dein Investitionskapital weiter ✔️✔️ 💯 Sicheres Trading 💯 Rendite 💯 Garantiert 💯 Risiko 🔔 Jetzt starten 👇 …

29 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC10 viewsread 29 September 2026

Für unsere Abonnenten, die wenig Zeit haben und den Markt nicht ständig verfolgen können: Unser Investment-Service bietet Ihnen enorme Vorteile. Dieses Paket ist ideal für vielbeschäftigte Trader, Anfänger und alle, die beim eigenständigen Handeln kein Risiko eingehen möchten. Bei Interesse senden Sie mir einfach eine Nachricht. Klicken Sie auf die angeheftete Nachricht, um mich direkt zu kontaktieren. 100 % GARAN…

29 Sept 2026, 08:21 UTC10 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

💬💬RÜCKMELDUNG WILLE ÜBERZEUGEN SIE👇👇 Anjas Feedback von heute Morgen habe ich oben gepostet. Der deutliche Gewinnanstieg auf 874.097,00 USD ist ein Grund zum Feiern. Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Anja! 🎊🥂 t.me/Handelsunterstutzung1

29 Sept 2026, 08:20 UTC10 viewsread 29 September 2026

BESTÄTIGT: RUSSLAND öffnet NORDSTREAM! - PUTIN sendet heftige NACHRICHT an DEUTSCHE BÜRGER! https://youtu.be/bdPIVwWmXF4

29 Sept 2026, 08:20 UTC9 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

🚫Habeck dementiert Gerüchte zur Gründung einer neuen Partei Der frühere Vizekanzler Robert Habeck hat am Sonntagabend in der ARD-Sendung „Caren Miosga“ Gerüchte dementiert, er wolle eine neue Partei gründen. „Da ist nichts dran“, sagte er. Ungefähr hundertmal sei er vor dem Auftritt auf die Spekulation angesprochen worden, schilderte der Grünen-Politiker. Im Umlauf war die Idee, er könne gemeinsam mit dem früheren …

29 Sept 2026, 08:20 UTC9 viewsread 29 September 2026

AB HEUTE: CDU WILL GRUNDRECHTE SOFORT ABSCHAFFEN! (Spannungsfall angedroht) https://youtu.be/qRh6OPrrhds

29 Sept 2026, 08:19 UTC7 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

„Offiziell werden 151 von 199 Taten dem rechten Spektrum zugeordnet. Von diesen 151 Fällen wiederum haben fast 70 Prozent jedoch keinen Täter oder Tatverdächtigen. Und: In der Statistik finden sich etliche fehlerhafte Zuordnungen. Beispielsweise ein Algerier, der über Wochen immer wieder denselben Satz auf Facebook postet: „Juden sind Terroristen und Rassisten“ – und anschließend in seiner Heimat untertaucht. Oder:…

29 Sept 2026, 08:17 UTC7 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🚀 Ich bin aktiv für diejenigen, die bereit sind zu investieren. Die Investitionsfenster ✅ sind jetzt geöffnet. Schließen Sie sich Investoren an, die sich bereits positionieren, um durch disziplinierte Strategien und professionelle Beratung Gewinne zu erzielen. 📩 Schreiben Sie mir jetzt eine Nachricht, um loszulegen. Telegramm: t.me/Handelsunterstutzung1 ✅️

Showing the 12 most recent of 781 posts we hold for @BITCOINHOTEL_Admin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bitcoin Hotel OFFIZIELL” (@BITCOINHOTEL_Admin), 67,822 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BITCOINHOTEL_Admin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.