The Fake News Blues, by DJT Src: https://youtu.be/8vnb0bFytEM Thanks, Sith Daddy.
β€41π7π1
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ

Channel
@BLUEPRINT_Q
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
12,251subscribers
-187 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001552516357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BLUEPRINT_Q |
| Created | 27 September 2021 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BLUEPRINT_Q |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:35 | 12,251 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:47 | 12,256 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 12,260 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 12,268 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 12,271 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 12,273 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 12,281 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 12,288 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 12,294 | -18 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 12,312 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 12,316 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 12,330 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 12,342 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 12,349 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 12,356 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 12,365 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 12,373 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 12,380 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 12,381 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 12,384 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (21 June 2026 β 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,180 |
| Reactions total | 219 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 22:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
1,324 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 355 | 26.8% | |
| β€ | 274 | 20.7% | |
| π― | 210 | 15.9% | |
| π | 205 | 15.5% | |
| π | 139 | 10.5% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 51 | 3.85% | |
| π | 34 | 2.57% | |
| π | 25 | 1.89% | |
| π«‘ | 6 | 0.453% | |
| π | 5 | 0.378% | |
| π | 4 | 0.302% | |
| π€£ | 4 | 0.302% | |
| β‘ | 3 | 0.227% | |
| π | 3 | 0.227% | |
| π€ | 3 | 0.227% | |
| π | 1 | 0.076% | |
| π | 1 | 0.076% | |
| π€‘ | 1 | 0.076% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,324 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Fake News Blues, by DJT Src: https://youtu.be/8vnb0bFytEM Thanks, Sith Daddy.
β€41π7π1
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ
BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ pinned Β«As The Democrats incessantly decry the horrors of Trump to a perpetually shrinking audience, notice the one thing you will never hear them say is that Trump is not delivering on everything he promised the American people to win his re-election. An objectivelyβ¦Β»
As The Democrats incessantly decry the horrors of Trump to a perpetually shrinking audience, notice the one thing you will never hear them say is that Trump is not delivering on everything he promised the American people to win his re-election. An objectively historic re-election that: Produced the first presidential candidate to be shot in the head and survive the assassination attempt; Re-won the White House folβ¦
β€βπ₯43π22π―5β€4π3π3π₯2
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ
Imagine VP Trump for another 8 yrs. https://x.com/magadevildog/status/2086161975047020825?s=46 Itβs lawful. Per Cornell Law: βBy its terms, the Twenty-Second Amendment bars only the election of two-term Presidents, and this prohibition would not prevent someone who had twice been elected President from succeeding to the office after having been elected or appointed Vice President. Broader language providing that nβ¦
π57β€14β€βπ₯8π5π€3π€‘1
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ
The 3 Warfares doctrine.
π₯40π―7π5π2
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ
Quick reminder, the person who live-texted Democrat Congresswoman Plaskett during the Cohen deposition to direct damage to Trump in his first term, was a global-elite Baβalist whose cult eats babies as ritual, on and off the island. Today that admitted Rothschild agent is dead, his handler is rotting in prison, and AMERICA is defeating their geopolitical world order.
π₯75β€8
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ
When once America is presented with the full scope of organized criminal infiltration Trump and the Patriots are now proofing across theater, from our elections, to the plandemic, to our mass invasion, to nation collapsing Treasury fraud, to endless wars, assassinations, and death-cult proliferation, to child trafficking and consumption, to the satanic communist cult behind it all, a historic reckoning is sure to folβ¦
π75π₯41π25β€4β‘3π2π―2π€£2
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ
If a court were to conclude that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump based on clear, admissible, and outcome determinative evidence, American election law already provides a roadmap for meaningful remedies. Cases such as Marks v. Stinson demonstrate that when courts find proven election fraud affecting the outcome, they have not hesitated to remove certified winners and recognize the lawful result. Bell v. Soutβ¦
π₯76β€19π10π3
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ
MAGA is Americaβs undisputed anti-fraud movement. In just 17 months, President Trump has saved the US taxpayer $450 billion in fraud detection (and counting): Vance task force already at $160 billion in fraud detection. DOGE at $215 billion in annual fraud (and waste) detection. $6.3 billion in government contracting fraud detected. Healthcare and social services fraud detection at $1.4 billion. COVID/SBA loansβ¦
π92β€17π₯10π2π€£2π1
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ
First transparency (Great Awakening) THEN accountability (Justice). https://t.me/realx22report/13176 The anti American lawfare long infecting our Judicial System is beyond obvious to the American people now. This transparency was necessary to drive public demand (vote share) for judicial reform. Constitutionally, Congress is the only way to enforce needed reform. The House has the power to impeach any judge, inclβ¦
π56π₯24β€13
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ
π¦ πΊπΈ youtu.be/6qNHTriYVuA
β€53π₯28π1
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ
Enjoy the show! ππΏ WWG1WGA
π―87π25π₯15β€6π3
Signed BLUEPRINT πΊπΈ
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @BLUEPRINT_Q. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@BLUEPRINT_Q edited 1 post after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βBLUEPRINT πΊπΈβ (@BLUEPRINT_Q), 12,251 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BLUEPRINT_Q.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.