Channel

🦋𝐓𝐄𝐒𝐓+𝐓𝐎𝐏𝐈𝐂+𝐏𝐃𝐅 🦋

@BPSC_HW_PDF

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,355subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001837504333
Type	Channel
Username	@BPSC_HW_PDF
Created	Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	17 September 2026
Last confirmed live	17 September 2026
Measurements held	6
On Telegram	t.me/BPSC_HW_PDF

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6 measurements spanning 15 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,330–2,358 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
17 Sept 2026, 00:55	2,355	no change
16 Sept 2026, 17:37	2,355	+7
12 Sept 2026, 16:17	2,348	-1
8 Sept 2026, 14:37	2,349	+12
3 Sept 2026, 01:24	2,337	+4
2 Sept 2026, 05:45	2,333	first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Hindi Motivation™
@ismart_92 · 22,485
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 20 September 2026

EduSandhan Test Series| BPSSC SI/ESI | BSSC | NTPCl EDU SANDHAN
@EduSandhanTestSeries · 28,334
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 9 September 2026

IAS Valley — by IITian
@ias_valley · 36,262
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🦋𝐓𝐄𝐒𝐓+𝐓𝐎𝐏𝐈𝐂+𝐏𝐃𝐅 🦋” (@BPSC_HW_PDF), 2,355 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BPSC_HW_PDF.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.