Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Bot

Backupechanew

@Backupechanew_bot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

20,986monthly users

+1,654 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID7675336233
TypeBot
Username@Backupechanew_bot
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Backupechanew_bot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,33224,35521,843.514 August 2026 — 19,332 monthly users16 August 2026 — 21,670 monthly users16 August 2026 — 21,670 monthly users17 August 2026 — 21,818 monthly users19 August 2026 — 20,965 monthly users20 August 2026 — 20,308 monthly users23 August 2026 — 20,547 monthly users24 August 2026 — 20,052 monthly users26 August 2026 — 22,338 monthly users30 August 2026 — 23,771 monthly users31 August 2026 — 23,755 monthly users3 September 2026 — 24,355 monthly users5 September 2026 — 24,155 monthly users9 September 2026 — 24,100 monthly users11 September 2026 — 23,639 monthly users13 September 2026 — 22,833 monthly users15 September 2026 — 21,653 monthly users17 September 2026 — 20,986 monthly users20,98614 August 202617 September 2026
18 measurements spanning 34 days, net +1,654. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,579–25,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:1520,986-667
15 Sept 2026, 07:0021,653-1,180
13 Sept 2026, 12:4122,833-806
11 Sept 2026, 14:4123,639-461
9 Sept 2026, 00:2024,100-55
5 Sept 2026, 18:0024,155-200
3 Sept 2026, 18:5824,355+600
31 Aug 2026, 03:3723,755-16
30 Aug 2026, 00:4923,771+1,433
26 Aug 2026, 22:1622,338+2,286
24 Aug 2026, 18:5820,052-495
23 Aug 2026, 03:0220,547+239
20 Aug 2026, 13:2320,308-657
19 Aug 2026, 15:0420,965-853
17 Aug 2026, 14:2721,818+148
16 Aug 2026, 16:0321,670no change
16 Aug 2026, 06:3721,670+2,338
14 Aug 2026, 07:0019,332first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Backupechanew” (@Backupechanew_bot), 20,986 monthly users as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Backupechanew_bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.