Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐Ÿ‘‘ ยซ ู†ูู€ุฎู’ู€ุจูŽู€ุฉู ุงู„ู€ุจูŽู€ูƒูŽู€ุงู„ูู€ูˆุฑู’ูŠูŽู€ุง ยป | BAC 2027 ๐ŸŽ“๐Ÿฉบ

Channel

๐Ÿ‘‘ ยซ ู†ูู€ุฎู’ู€ุจูŽู€ุฉู ุงู„ู€ุจูŽู€ูƒูŽู€ุงู„ูู€ูˆุฑู’ูŠูŽู€ุง ยป | BAC 2027 ๐ŸŽ“๐Ÿฉบ

@Bacwithhibet2026

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

1,415subscribers

+1,007 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003678764401
TypeChannel
Username@Bacwithhibet2026
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bacwithhibet2026

Topic

Education โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4081,415911.58 August 2026 โ€” 408 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 449 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 551 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 654 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 709 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 1,044 subscribers11 September 2026 โ€” 1,260 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 1,415 subscribers8 August 202615 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 38 days, net +1,007. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 257โ€“1,566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 07:591,415+155
11 Sept 2026, 21:351,260+216
7 Sept 2026, 03:021,044+335
30 Aug 2026, 07:02709+55
24 Aug 2026, 06:38654+103
16 Aug 2026, 20:19551+102
9 Aug 2026, 19:41449+41
8 Aug 2026, 19:30408first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค3579.5%
๐Ÿ˜49.09%
๐Ÿ˜ญ24.55%
๐Ÿฅฐ24.55%
๐Ÿ’˜12.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC33 viewsread 8 August 2026

ุฌู…ุงุนุฉ ุงุนุชุฐุฑ ู…ุงู„ู‚ูŠุชุด ู„ูŠ ุฑุงุญ ูŠุนุงูˆู†ูˆู†ูŠ ุจุงู‡ ู†ุทุจู‚ูˆ ุงู„ููƒุฑุฉ ู…ู† ุบูŠุฑ ุดุนุจุฉ ุนู„ูˆู… ุชุฌุฑูŠุจูŠุฉ ูˆุงุญุชู…ุงู„ ุดุนุจุฉ ุชู‚ู†ูŠ ุฑูŠุงุถูŠ ุฅุฐุง ุตู„ุญุช ู„ู„ุฃุณู ๐Ÿฅฒ๐Ÿ’”ู…ู†ุนุฑู ุฅุฐุง ู†ุทุจู‚ู‡ู… ูˆู„ุงู„ุง ู„ุง ุงุนู„ู… ๐Ÿฅฒ

8 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC54 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ุงู„ู…ู†ุถู…ูŠู† ุงู„ุฌุฏุฏ ู„ุนุงุฆู„ุชู†ุง ุญู„ู„ุชู… ุฃู‡ู„ุง ูˆุณู‡ู„ุง ุจูŠู†ู†ุง ุฅู† ุดุงุก ุงู„ู„ู‡ ุชุณุชููŠุฏูˆ ู…ู† ุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ ูˆุฃู† ุชูƒูˆู† ู„ูƒู… ุฏู„ูŠู„ุงู‹ ููŠ ุนุงู…ูƒู… ู‡ุฐุง ู„ุฃูŠ ุณุคุงู„ ุฃูˆ ุงุณุชูุณุงุฑ ุฃุฑุณู„ูˆุง ุฑุณุงู„ุฉ ุนุจุฑ ุงู„ุฑุงุจุท ูˆุงุฌูŠุจูƒู… ููŠ ุฃู‚ุตุฑ ู…ุฏุฉ ุจุฅุฐู† ุงู„ู„ู‡ ๐Ÿƒ๐Ÿค https://ngl.link/hiba_bac20261

๐Ÿ’˜1

8 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC55 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

ุจุฏูŠุชูˆ ุงู„ู…ูƒุชุณุจุงุช๐ŸŒŸุŸ

  1. ู†ุนู… ุจุฏูŠุช ุฏูŠุฌุง๐Ÿ‘18%
  2. ู…ุฒุงู„ ุญุชุงู† ู†ุต ุงูˆุช๐Ÿ˜27%
  3. ู…ู†ุจุฏุงุด ุญุชุงู† ูŠู„ุญู‚ ุณุจุชู…ุจุฑ๐Ÿ˜Œ36%
  4. ู…ู†ุจุฏุงุด ุญุชู‰ ุงู„ุฏุฎูˆู„ ุงู„ู…ุฏุฑุณูŠ๐Ÿ˜‘18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

โค2

8 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ู…ู…ูƒู† ุฑุงุญ ุชู„ุบู‰ ุงู„ููƒุฑุฉ ๐Ÿฅฒ๐Ÿ’” ู„ุงู†ูˆ ู…ู„ู‚ูŠุชุด ู„ูŠ ูŠุนุงูˆู†ูˆู†ูŠ ููŠู‡ุง ๐Ÿ˜”๐Ÿ’”

๐Ÿ˜ญ2

8 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Prof_Salsabil_2027Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

โค2

8 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC62 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Prof_Salsabil_2027

ุงุณู…ุนูˆ ุงู„ู…ุญูˆุฑ ุงู„ุฃูˆู„ ุนู„ุงูˆุงู‡ ูŠู‡ุฏุฑ ูˆู…ุจุนุฏ ู†ุชูุงู‡ู…ูˆ ุนู„ู‰ ุงู„ู…ู†ู‡ุฌูŠุฉ ูˆุงู„ุฃุดูŠุงุก ุงู„ุฃุฎุฑู‰

8 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC70 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ุฌู…ุงุนุฉ ุฎู…ู…ุช ูุงู„ููƒุฑุฉ ูˆุฌุงุชู†ูŠ ููƒุฑุฉ ู…ุนุงู‡ุง ูุฅุฐุง ุชุนุฑููˆ ุทู„ุงุจ ู…ุชู…ูŠุฒูŠู† ููŠ ุฅุญุฏู‰ ุงู„ุดุนุจ ู…ุงุนุฏุง ุงู„ุนู„ูˆู… ุชุฌุฑูŠุจูŠุฉ ู„ุงู†ูˆ ู„ู‚ูŠุช ูˆู…ู†ู‚ุฏุฑุด ู†ุทุจู‚ ุงู„ููƒุฑุฉ ูˆุญุฏูŠ ๐Ÿ™‚ ุนู„ุงุจูŠู‡ุง ุฅุฐุง ุชุนุฑููˆุง ู…ู†ู‡ู… ุงุจุนุซูˆู‡ู…ู„ูŠ ูˆู„ุง ู‚ูˆู„ูˆู„ู‡ู… ูŠุชูˆุงุตู„ูˆุง ู…ุนุงูŠุง ุนุจุฑ ุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป๐Ÿค

๐Ÿฅฐ2

8 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC85 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ุฌู…ุงุนุฉ ุงุจุงุฑุทุงุฌูŠูˆ ุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ ุชุทู„ุน ูุถู„ุงู‹ ุจุงู‡ ูŠุณุชูุงุฏูˆ ุฃูƒุจุฑ ุนุฏุฏ ู…ู…ูƒู† ู…ู† ุงู„ุทู„ุงุจ ๐Ÿค https://t.me/Bacwithhibet2026

โค4

8 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC101 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ูˆุฅุฐุง ูƒุงูŠู† ู‡ู†ุง ุทู„ุจุฉ ุฌุงู…ุนูŠูŠู† ู…ุชู…ูŠุฒูŠู† ููŠ ุฅุญุฏู‰ ุงู„ุดุนุจ ุฎู„ูŠูˆู„ูŠ ุชุนู„ูŠู‚ ู†ุชูˆุงุตู„ ู…ุนุงูƒู… ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป๐Ÿค

โค6

8 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC107 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ุจุฅุฐู† ุงู„ู„ู‡ ุฅุฐุง ูƒูุงู†ูŠ ุงู„ูˆู‚ุชุŒ ู„ุงู†ูˆ ู…ุงู… ุฃู†ุง ู†ู‚ุฑุง ูˆุนู†ุฏูŠ ุงู„ุชุฒุงู…ุงุช ุนู„ุงุจูŠู‡ุง ู„ุถูŠู‚ ุงู„ูˆู‚ุช ู…ุฏุฑุชู‡ุงุด ู…ูŠ ุจุฅุฐู† ุงู„ู„ู‡ ุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ ุฑุงุญ ุชูƒูˆู† ูƒุงููŠุฉ ูˆูˆุงููŠุฉ ๐Ÿชท๐Ÿ’—ุฐุฑูƒ ู†ุฏูŠุฑู„ูƒู… ู„ูƒู„ ุดุนุจุฉ ุงุฏู…ู† ู…ู† ู†ูุณ ุงู„ุดุนุจุฉ ูˆู…ุชู…ูŠุฒ ููŠู‡ุง ูŠู†ุตุญูˆูƒู… ูˆูŠูˆุฌู‡ูˆูƒู… ูˆุจุงู„ุชูˆููŠู‚ ู„ู„ุฌู…ูŠุน ูŠุงุฑุจ ๐Ÿค

โค5

8 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC122 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจุฑุณู…ูŠุง ุชุฃุฌูŠู„ ุงู„ุฏุฎูˆู„ ุงู„ู…ุฏุฑุณูŠ ู„ 21 ุณุจุชู…ุจุฑ

โค9

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Bacwithhibet2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

ุจุฏูŠุชูˆ ุงู„ู…ูƒุชุณุจุงุช๐ŸŒŸุŸ

  1. ู†ุนู… ุจุฏูŠุช ุฏูŠุฌุง๐Ÿ‘18%
  2. ู…ุฒุงู„ ุญุชุงู† ู†ุต ุงูˆุช๐Ÿ˜27%
  3. ู…ู†ุจุฏุงุด ุญุชุงู† ูŠู„ุญู‚ ุณุจุชู…ุจุฑ๐Ÿ˜Œ36%
  4. ู…ู†ุจุฏุงุด ุญุชู‰ ุงู„ุฏุฎูˆู„ ุงู„ู…ุฏุฑุณูŠ๐Ÿ˜‘18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ÿ‘‘ ยซ ู†ูู€ุฎู’ู€ุจูŽู€ุฉู ุงู„ู€ุจูŽู€ูƒูŽู€ุงู„ูู€ูˆุฑู’ูŠูŽู€ุง ยป | BAC 2027 ๐ŸŽ“๐Ÿฉบโ€ (@Bacwithhibet2026), 1,415 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bacwithhibet2026.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.