Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,508–13,766 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 23:57
13,736
+30
15 Sept 2026, 21:17
13,706
-7
14 Sept 2026, 08:21
13,713
+3
12 Sept 2026, 19:19
13,710
+14
10 Sept 2026, 18:56
13,696
+8
7 Sept 2026, 16:01
13,688
+5
4 Sept 2026, 20:16
13,683
-9
3 Sept 2026, 02:25
13,692
+3
2 Sept 2026, 00:24
13,689
+16
1 Sept 2026, 02:15
13,673
+14
31 Aug 2026, 03:57
13,659
-6
30 Aug 2026, 03:25
13,665
-2
29 Aug 2026, 02:25
13,667
+3
28 Aug 2026, 02:47
13,664
+4
27 Aug 2026, 04:27
13,660
-3
25 Aug 2026, 05:11
13,663
+2
24 Aug 2026, 05:12
13,661
+15
22 Aug 2026, 13:42
13,646
+32
21 Aug 2026, 07:28
13,614
+9
20 Aug 2026, 08:54
13,605
first reading
Engagement
90 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 13,736 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,740
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 90 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
90 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
68,560
Reactions total
4,018
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 03s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,201 reactions across 90 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,911
69.8%
👍
1,283
9.03%
👌
1,002
7.06%
🔥
688
4.84%
💔
427
3.01%
😭
354
2.49%
🤝
248
1.75%
❤🔥
165
1.16%
🙏
123
0.866%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,201 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
احتمالا خیلی از شما میدونید که فرق امپراطور با پادشاه چیه.
برای اونهایی که نمیدونن میگم.
پادشاه به یک سرزمین و قوم حکومت میکنه. اماامپراطوری معمولاً یک ساختار سیاسیه که در آن یک قدرت مرکزی بر سرزمینها و مردمان متعدد، اغلب از طریق فتح، الحاق یا سلطه سیاسی، حکومت میکنه
مثلا امپراطوری هخامنشیان، از جنوب آسیا تا شمال آفریقا و شرق اروپا کشیده شده بوده. صدها قوم و زبان و فرهنگ مختلف.
پس بهش میگن امپراطوری.
حالا چرا به…
نمیدونم نشنال جغرافی در ایران پیدا میشه یا نه
ولی کلا از اینجور مجلات دانستینها رو پیدا کنید زیاد بخونید
حتی شماره های قدیمی رو پیدا کنید و دست دوم بخرید هم ارزش داره.
واقعاً اطلاعات عمومی آدم درمورد جهان اطراف و تاریخ و همه چیز رو ارتقاء میده
ولی تو چه منطقه قدیمی زندگی میکنیما😅
فک کنید آدمهایی که تو زمان این نقشه داشتن در فلات ایران زندگی میکردن، بهشون بگن هزارو دویست سال بعد از شما تازه امپراتوری هخامنشی تشکیل میشه!!
جالبه توی یکی از مجلات نشنال جغرافی که داریم، یه پرونده درمورد تمدن «هیتی» ها داره
الان رفتم ببینم اونجا ایران رو چی نوشته:))
تمدن هیتی ها ١٢٠٠ سال قبل از هخامنشیان در منطقه آناتولی، ترکیه امروز، بوده
اون زمان هنوز هخامنشیان نبودن پس امپراطوری پرشیا یا پارس هم وجود نداشته و تو عکس نیست
ولی با رنگ سفید اسم ایران (و البته همه کشورهای همسایه) رو نوشته که بهتر بشه فهمید تمدنهای اون زمان کجا بودن.
تمدن عیلام و انشان در م…
هرگز این نشریه نیوتون نمیومد تو صفحه اول مطلبش بنویسه «ایرانی که امروز میشناسیم ریشه در تمدنی کهن و پرافتخاری مانند امپراطوری هخامنشی دارد» و بعد بیاد هر خط دوبار اسم ایران رو بیاره و تاریخ بزنه که چه سالهایی این آثار در یونسکو ثبت شدن!
میومد مینوشت پرونده ای درمورد امپراطوری پارس، سال ثبتشون رو هم نمیزد که مبادا خواننده بگه عه! مگه هنوز هم این تمدن زنده است؟! و بعد هم فقط چهارتا عکس آثار هخامنشی ها رو بدون هرگونه تص…
دیروز من چیزی که میخواستم بعد از گزارش تصویری مجله از ایران بنویسم، کلا بخاطر بحث های تو کامنتها به انحراف کشیده شد:)
حرفم چیز دیگه بود که الان مفصل براتون میگم!
چیزی که از همه در این نوشته مجله برای من مهمه و باید برای شما هم باشه، کلمه «ایران» هست!
یعنی چی؟
ببینید اینکه مجله میاد میگه امپراطوری هخامنشیان و پارسی، ریشه و تاریخ کشور امروزی «ایران» هست، اصلا و ابدا چیز پیش پا افتاده و ساده و معمولی نیست که راحت از کن…
من بهیچ عنوان منکر این نیستم که در دوران پهلوی هم مثل دوران بعد انقلاب و تمام دوره های تاریخ ایران،
آدمهای دلسوز زیادی در زمینه تاریخ و فرهنگ و هنر داشتیم
آدمهایی که کارهای زیادی کردن و تلاش کردن.
منتها داریم برمبنای فکت و سند صحبت میکنیم.
یونسکو همه چیز رو دقیق ثبت کرده.
چهارسال قبل از انقلاب اسلامی، ایران به عضویت یونسکو درآمده
اما هیچگونه درخواست و فعالیت و چیزی درمورد آثار تاریخی از طرف ایران در اون ثبت نشده.
…
اسناد رسمی یونسکو نشون میدن که ایران در اوایل خردادماه ۵٨درخواست ثبت تخت جمشید، چغازنبیل و میدان نقش جهان رو به یونسکو داده و چندماه بعد همون سال هم اینا ثبت شدن
درحالیکه ایران از چهارسال قبلش در یونسکو بوده ولی چیزی ثبت یا درخواست نکرده
اینجا هم قلعه فلک الفلاک
اورامانات کردستان
تخت سلیمان
سازه آبی شوشتر
کاروانسرا
باغ ایرانی
و کعبه زرتشت
نویسنده ژاپنیه و مطلب مال مرکزی به نام مطالعات بین النهرین در ژاپن هست
خیلی خوبه! از این به بعد میتونم اینو با خودم ببرم مدارس!
❤131❤🔥13👌8🙏3💔2👍1
Signed Zeinab ☫ ゼイナブ
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @Bahrami_Zeinab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Bahrami_Zeinab edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
میم مثل زهرا☔ @mim_mesle_zahra · 21,611 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 September 2026
يك حامد عسكری معمولی @hamedaskary · 22,548 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
آموزش سواد سایبری @Cyber_Literacy · 27,902 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زینب بهرامی در ژاپن 🇮🇷” (@Bahrami_Zeinab), 13,736 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bahrami_Zeinab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
