Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال هواداران بارسلونا ( بارسا )

Channel

کانال هواداران بارسلونا ( بارسا )

@BarcelonaFcb_i

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

177,560subscribers

+14,314 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002287608241
TypeChannel
Username@BarcelonaFcb_i
Descriptionبزرگترین چنل هواداران آبی اناری 💙❤️ 🏆 | هفته ششم لالیگا 🔵 بارسلونا V راسینگ 🔴 📆 | چهارشنبه ، ۲۵ شهریور ⏰️ | ساعت ۲۳ 🏟 | ورزشگاه نیوکمپ جهت تبلیغات : @BarcaCrAdss
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BarcelonaFcb_i

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

161,496177,560169,5287 August 2026 — 163,246 subscribers8 August 2026 — 162,610 subscribers9 August 2026 — 162,035 subscribers10 August 2026 — 161,925 subscribers11 August 2026 — 162,974 subscribers12 August 2026 — 162,915 subscribers13 August 2026 — 162,707 subscribers15 August 2026 — 162,677 subscribers16 August 2026 — 162,627 subscribers17 August 2026 — 162,559 subscribers18 August 2026 — 161,511 subscribers19 August 2026 — 161,496 subscribers20 August 2026 — 164,506 subscribers21 August 2026 — 164,511 subscribers23 August 2026 — 164,446 subscribers24 August 2026 — 164,603 subscribers25 August 2026 — 164,514 subscribers26 August 2026 — 164,532 subscribers27 August 2026 — 164,670 subscribers28 August 2026 — 164,819 subscribers29 August 2026 — 164,849 subscribers30 August 2026 — 164,936 subscribers31 August 2026 — 164,925 subscribers1 September 2026 — 165,029 subscribers2 September 2026 — 171,105 subscribers3 September 2026 — 171,085 subscribers5 September 2026 — 171,636 subscribers9 September 2026 — 171,717 subscribers11 September 2026 — 171,781 subscribers13 September 2026 — 174,339 subscribers15 September 2026 — 174,326 subscribers17 September 2026 — 177,560 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net +14,314. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 159,086–179,970 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:59177,560+3,234
15 Sept 2026, 10:40174,326-13
13 Sept 2026, 16:38174,339+2,558
11 Sept 2026, 20:19171,781+64
9 Sept 2026, 06:17171,717+81
5 Sept 2026, 20:19171,636+551
3 Sept 2026, 21:15171,085-20
2 Sept 2026, 13:42171,105+6,076
1 Sept 2026, 15:54165,029+104
31 Aug 2026, 16:27164,925-11
30 Aug 2026, 17:27164,936+87
29 Aug 2026, 15:23164,849+30
28 Aug 2026, 15:43164,819+149
27 Aug 2026, 17:03164,670+138
26 Aug 2026, 17:47164,532+18
25 Aug 2026, 19:37164,514-89
24 Aug 2026, 21:05164,603+157
23 Aug 2026, 04:34164,446-65
21 Aug 2026, 14:37164,511+5
20 Aug 2026, 17:13164,506first reading

Engagement

1,581 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.43%
avg views ÷ 177,560 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,100
980 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
984
of 1,581 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 972 of 980 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held1,581 (7 August 202622 September 2026)
Views total5,975,811
Reactions total227,405
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 07:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
27,500
Videos
619
Links
1,040

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
29m 34s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 58 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

229,525 reactions across 987 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
130,63456.9%
🤣34,43315.0%
👍16,6397.25%
🔥14,9076.49%
💔10,4354.55%
🖕5,7212.49%
👎5,0012.18%
❤‍🔥2,7541.20%
😐2,2400.976%
👏1,5570.678%
💩1,1440.498%
🤡9650.42%
🤯9550.416%
🤔4220.184%
😭3390.148%
🗿2990.13%
😍2620.114%
💘2600.113%
😡1570.068%
💯790.034%
9 further kinds3220.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 988 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229,525 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 22 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 996 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BarcelonaFcb_i. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 22 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,410 views50 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

⚽️ سوفا اسکور : 🇪🇸 بارسلونا دومین تیم از نظر مسافت طی‌شده در لالیگا در این فصل بوده؛ با میانگین ۱۰۴.۶۴ کیلومتر در هر بازی، @BarcelonaFcb_i

49👎1

22 Sept 2026, 06:18 UTC≈3,130 views153 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🎤 دلا فوئنته : 🔻 سخت‌ترین لحظه کریر من ، مصدومیت گاوی در وایادولید بود. دیدن واکنش بازیکن‌ها و رختکن واقعا دردناک بود . همه تو رختکن بودن و فیزیوتراپ‌ها گاوی رو در آغوش گرفته بودن و ازش حمایت می‌کردن. واقعا خیلی تاثیرگذار بود. @BarcelonaFcb_i

125🖕22💔5❤‍🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 05:59 UTC≈3,460 views203 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

📱 جرارد رومرو: 🔻 برای ما بهتره که همچنان درباره داوری‌ها حرف بزنن. خوبه که نمی‌بینن تیمشون از نظر فوتبالی افتضاحه ، دارن این قضیه رو پشت بهانه‌های داوری پنهان می‌کنن. @BarcelonaFcb_i

🤣1926👍4🖕1

21 Sept 2026, 21:38 UTC≈6,740 views6 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🦖 آماده‌ای هیجان واقعی رو تجربه کنی؟ 🦖 در TrexBet، دنیایی از اسلات‌های جذاب، بازی‌های کازینوی زنده و لحظه‌های هیجان‌انگیز منتظر توئه! 🦖صدها بازی متنوع 🦖تجربه‌ای سریع و روان 🦖هیجان در هر اسپین 🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖 TREXBET — PLAY. PREDICT. WIN. https://TrexBet.com T.me/TrexBet_Ir

👎6

21 Sept 2026, 21:32 UTC≈6,960 views361 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

⚽️ جود بلینگام خطاب به کوتی : 🔻 وقتی مسی هست خیلی حرف می‌زنی، ولی اینجا هیچی، مطلقا هیچی! ترسویی چون مسی نیست! ‼️ کوتی : 🔻 برو بیرون گریه کن، گریه کن… تو یه بچه‌ننه‌ای! 😂 🔻 مقابل شماها بازی کردن غیرممکنه. هر چیزی رو به نفع شما سوت می‌زنن. @BarcelonaFcb_i

👍296🤣4913❤‍🔥2🔥1

21 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC≈7,160 views566 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

اسطوره مسی در اینستاگرام: «آخرین بازی... پیراهنی برای تمام عمر.» @BarcelonaFcb_i

442😭78💔42❤‍🔥1💩1🕊1🤣1

21 Sept 2026, 21:07 UTC≈7,290 views919 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

فران تورس تمام استوری های مربوط به دوران حضورش در بارسا رو از هایلایت‌های اینستاگرامش پاک کرده. @BarcelonaFcb_i

🖕813💩51🤣3010👍5💔4😐3🔥2

21 Sept 2026, 20:46 UTC≈7,700 views769 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🎤 فران تورس: 🔻این هفته درگیر اسباب‌کشی‌ام و دارم همه وسایلم رو از بارسلونا جمع می‌کنم. 🔻 فقط یه چیزی هست که نمی‌تونم با خودم ببرم؛ اونم پدریه! دلم براش تنگ می‌شه. @BarcelonaFcb_i

🤣490🖕23220😭12💔8💩6❤‍🔥1

21 Sept 2026, 20:33 UTC≈6,040 views413 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

ددی و سیبیل هاش در جوانی. ۱۹۸۰. 🔴🔵| @Barcatweetfc

361🤣50💘1🤯1

21 Sept 2026, 20:11 UTC≈7,950 views361 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

🎤 کیلیان امباپه درباره توپ طلا: 🔻 از نظر فردی سال فوق‌العاده‌ای داشتم و می‌دونم که عملکرد فردی مهم‌ترین معیار در جایزه توپ طلاست. من در تمام رقابت‌های بزرگ بهترین گلزن بودم. 🔻 فکر می‌کنم می‌تونه سال خوبی برای من باشه و خودم هم همین حس رو دارم. @BarcelonaFcb_i

🤣307🖕349👍6🤡3🔥2

21 Sept 2026, 19:52 UTC≈8,000 views294 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🎤 🚨 رافینیا: 🔻 بدون هیچ شکی، لامین باید توپ طلا رو ببره. برای بردن این جایزه، آمار فردی، جام‌های تیمی، کیفیت و جادوی بازیکن داخل زمین و کاریزما مهمه و لامین همه این ویژگی‌ها رو داره. 🔻 آمار لامین فوق‌العاده‌ست، هم فصل گذشته و هم فصل‌های قبل، و این فصل رو هم خیلی خوب شروع کرده. فصل گذشته هم سه جام برد که دو تاش با بارسلونا و یکی با تیم ملی بود. 🔻به نظرم جام‌ها خیلی مهمن. چیزی که لامین تو زمین انجام داده، آمارش و جا

277🖕9👍7👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,581 posts we hold for @BarcelonaFcb_i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 21:14 UTCAnonymous Poll3,800 voters approx.

نمرتون به نقل‌و‌انتقالات

  1. 😄7%
  2. 😃8%
  3. 😁21%
  4. 😄34%
  5. 😃16%
  6. 😃😏14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 22 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال هواداران بارسلونا ( بارسا )” (@BarcelonaFcb_i), 177,560 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BarcelonaFcb_i.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.