Test
🔥13🏆4

Channel
@BaseTerror
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,703subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001476510396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BaseTerror |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BaseTerror |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 1,703 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 1,704 | -10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 1,714 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:34 | 1,721 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 1,724 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 1,725 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 1,727 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 1,729 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 1,732 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 1,731 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 1,739 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 1,745 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 1,745 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
373 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 272 | 72.9% | |
| 🤩 | 28 | 7.51% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 6.43% | |
| 🏆 | 15 | 4.02% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 2.68% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 2.41% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 1.34% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.804% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.536% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.536% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.536% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.268% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 373 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2024 to 3 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Test
🔥13🏆4
#pres #sq kalau ht salah maapin HAHAH GUA KETWA BANGET LIAT SISTEM OVK FLOP ANYING KEK PADA TUTUP MATA TENTANG SPILL-SPILLAN BEGINI, asal kalian tau gc all team bukanya tempat rapat atau tempat nyelesain masalah member/spillan eh mirip gc base cok bahkan lebih ramai dari base base ovk sendiri 🤣🤣, emang dasar sq flop oevka🤣, mana member member disono dekingan nya admin aduhh ngeri cuyy atutt dekingan nya own🥺, untuk…
🔥33🤩4❤3⚡1
#pers #Sq ini gasi ht nya?? maaf kalo salah gua mau bongkar sisi gelap pj mpps yaitu ISAMOVA sama ZACKY. jadi fyi kalo gak tau ISAMOVA nih co founder ovk dan ZACKY owner ovk, keliatan jelas dong kesayangannya😂. jadi mereka tu tegur salah satu team mpps kalo gak salah namanya fatih karena dia nanya ke admin lain soal mpps, jadi kayak gak tag isamova atau zacky gitu. mereka tegur sih fatih ini tegurnya kayak berkepanj…
🔥37⚡3🤩3❤2🏆2
ovk mulu anying
#pers fo ovk ray sama arez buta kah? gabisa liat kelakuan admin? goblok anjing fo macam tai, ini petinggi kaga mau evaluasi kah? admin juga kaga evaluasi ya? eh pasti evaluasi si tapi kenyataannya admin sama petinggi tolol. admin pernah nongol dibase? jarang kontoll eh pas evaluasi naik jabatan😂, petinggi pernah nongol & pantau base? kaga anjing, pas cc sarkas si ares dkk nongol baru pada nongol itu pun pada sarkas s…
🔥27💯2
#Pers si kanindia @tMommye cown ovk yang negur team bahkan member ga pake attitude sedikitpun, lebih tai nya ga dapet sp atau bahkan teguran, bahkan respon fown cuma "ngebiarin" gila kah? lu haus hormat, tapi lu sendiri ga bisa menghormati. gua bantu replace emot biasa ke emot prem dengan waktu yang udah mepet, bukan nya say thank you malah "kok ga di ganti?" halah pantek kau, emang ga gua ubah semua nya ke prem, kar…
🔥31🤩7🎉5❤1💔1
#pers adm ovk tuh kalo ga gay, ya cdc, senioritas, clone, selingkuh. problematik jancok, gue punya temen dulu nya adm di ovk dia punya pacar juga sesama adm blm lama pacaran si cowk nya di kabar kan masih suka sama adm lain yang mana jabatannya lebih tinggi dari ceweknya kasaranya pacarnya itu di jadiin pelampiasan, mana ngefaker juga ah sayang banget ya proof nya ke hapus😂, dia juga ngeclone jadi adm di ovk nama adm…
🔥29
#base mang bolehhkah basee se-freak ini???? MANA ADMIN SOKERAS BANGET 😭
🏆9🔥4🤩4👌2⚡1❤1🍾1
#pers CW/TW temen makan temen katanya, padahal temenan aja kaga😭😭. sarkasin orang giliran dijabanin dengan cara ngeroom sama yg bersangkutan malah out, lengkapnya di t.me/hwayashifuko
🔥5
#Pers Sebetulnya cc ares sama cc naraya ini betulan sama sama salah. jujur gue sendiri klo lagi nimbrung di basegab tiba tiba ares sama anteknya bahas ttg clone clone sampe di warn, tapi bukanya tobat malah terus dan ngerasa kaya kece banget gue bisa begini bisa begitu. terus naraya juga pantes g pd suka sm dia karna selalu spam bbc gak jelas dan demi top 1 kek top 1 bikin lo jadi ape si? cc ares juga sering bgt nye…
🔥20
#pers ovk nih banyak yang cdc tapi adm nya pada tutup mata apa gimana deh, liat aja sirkel nya nebula, tisy, nica (ex memb), cilo (ex memb), acela, malah pada bangga sering pamer cdc di st kocak 🤣🤣🤣🤣 pd gatau malu bgt najis
🔥8😍1
#Pers ada dari member ovk lagi nih min, ada salah satu member namanya Naraya dia ngeclone banyak banget di ovk. sampe sampe dia pacaran sama akun sendiri. terus akun clonenya itu seakan akan kejar kejar Naraya, sebenernya dia juga udah banyak di laporin ke admin, tapi adminnya tutup mata semua, mungkin karena dia top 1 BBC hahaha, terus dia pengen banget jadi top BBC, kerajaannya spam mulu padahal udah di tegur admin…
❤8😍2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BaseTerror. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BaseTerror named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❨ TERROR—AREA • BACK ❩” (@BaseTerror), 1,703 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BaseTerror.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.