https://x.com/UncleRickT/status/1975138571565842599
Signed Uncle Rick

Channel
@BasedCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,013subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001241747742 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BasedCalls |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BasedCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 2,013 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 2,016 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 2,020 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 2,021 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 2,024 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 2,026 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 2,034 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 2,038 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 2,041 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 2,045 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 2,045 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 13 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
127 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 37 | 29.1% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 22.0% | |
| 💯 | 27 | 21.3% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 16.5% | |
| ✍ | 9 | 7.09% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 3.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2024 to 6 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/UncleRickT/status/1975138571565842599
Signed Uncle Rick
Bought some $POU on SUI great team behind this think we see some good multiples from here https://dexscreener.com/sui/0xe84eb397112188c0c0bf9f5a908dfeb0dfb4783befea64ec5b781ac888f67d0c 0x2a4ff823f90bf8193dc801bbba1bae8676d91e1eb5cc3ed7b1ff35f5d7413a48::pou::POU
✍1
Signed Uncle Rick
they are NN my coins already but idc this is a set and forget come back to 10x sometime will revisit
🔥2
Signed Dagger
hop on this platform as soon as you can all tokens are early and ripping right now stack.so bought $base $barmstrong $jesse for now will update if there are more
👍2
Signed Dagger
Bought Hopecoin down here, seems pretty bottomed at 750k. The team and community are based, along with a good narrative, and the hope tech - ca analyzer combining iq and eq for a integrated experience giving data from onchain and social metrics combined will be shipped soon. Seems like a good bet for at least a few multiples 9he843sgdveqe2f38PE19sRFemZQATvbEPZNYU59pump
Signed Uncle Rick🪱
people just full jeeted that volume that was gay whatever will hold in case it revives I guess the real beta I was missing was $chillgirl
👍4💯1
Signed Dagger
$JOLLY is a good derivative on Chill guy at 300k mcap The guy that created the chill guy meme had created jolly guy before https://x.com/PhillipBankss/status/1738770902693597674 https://dexscreener.com/solana/demzqimwmd2vzc7danscgxzar3qvdzlxm1zudvb9z8oa 7RHFi973Zx8rwmnfmLHKdLhh5ifDB2Rs8GhSApVNpump
✍2❤2
Signed Dagger
send it?
Signed Dagger
https://x.com/Poppel20/status/1858034078970458300
👍4
Signed Dagger
tried $Copepoda because this Artist on twitter tweeted their address out and when i checked solscan it was the only token that had a value on solscan I'm gambling so take it as such https://x.com/Poppel20/status/1858007046165237809 CShCtn3nXcog5fHk8ABmLnc55TaP4h6x4ANNFxn5pump
🔥6❤5✍2👍1
Signed Dagger
Ive had a brain aneurism holding $KZL https://x.com/dagger100x/status/1857868596078424562?s=46&t=gxdjMrHAI0hMuo_U9NgBuQ
✍2💯1
Signed Dagger
$ARIE was undervalued indeed SEND MY SEALION TO THE STRATOSPHERE https://dexscreener.com/solana/g8o87kkgtavcdr8ontqyb65vcmgkw5dtrgthjxukmjpf 4ZiYgt9nyPXvSfBWADGYHiWnTdnogrFgLTALdFWVpump
🔥7👍5❤4💯4
Signed Dagger 🗡🔱
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BasedCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Based Calls 📈” (@BasedCalls), 2,013 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BasedCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.