Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BASTOMIY.UZ

Channel

BASTOMIY.UZ

@Bastomiy_uz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

11,788subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001300820799
TypeChannel
Username@Bastomiy_uz
DescriptionЎзбекистон мусулмонлари идораси Навоий вилояти Қизилтепа тумани "Боязид Бастомий" жомеъ масжидининг www.Bastomiy.uz сайти телеграмдаги расмий канали 🌐 https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAE2I8z9flnmT55KRMQ ©Каналдан маълумот олинганда манбаани кўрсатинг!
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bastomiy_uz

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,72411,98211,8536 August 2026 — 11,785 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,811 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,823 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,811 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,807 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,798 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,791 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,780 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,805 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,811 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,805 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,803 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,798 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,812 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,793 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,779 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,767 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,764 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,761 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,758 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,757 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,750 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,744 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,751 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,740 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,739 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,737 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,727 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,729 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,731 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,727 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,724 subscribers27 September 2026 — 11,982 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,946 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,915 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,888 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,882 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,883 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,888 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,886 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,871 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,872 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,856 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,848 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,847 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,845 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,834 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,831 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,836 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,835 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,836 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,825 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,817 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,816 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,811 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,805 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,803 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,799 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,788 subscribers11,7886 August 20267 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,685–12,021 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 12:3111,788-11
6 Nov 2026, 09:5911,799-4
5 Nov 2026, 07:2711,803-2
4 Nov 2026, 10:0911,805-6
3 Nov 2026, 13:3711,811-5
2 Nov 2026, 12:0811,816-1
1 Nov 2026, 10:3511,817-8
31 Oct 2026, 09:4011,825-11
30 Oct 2026, 11:2811,836+1
28 Oct 2026, 10:5611,835-1
27 Oct 2026, 08:3711,836+5
26 Oct 2026, 10:2611,831-3
25 Oct 2026, 12:4511,834-11
24 Oct 2026, 10:3811,845-2
23 Oct 2026, 07:4011,847-1
22 Oct 2026, 10:1111,848-8
21 Oct 2026, 01:2711,856-16
19 Oct 2026, 22:4911,872+1
18 Oct 2026, 23:1411,871-15
17 Oct 2026, 23:2611,886first reading

Engagement

517 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 11,788 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
100 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.324%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 517 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 93 of 100 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held517 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total134,564
Reactions total414
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈27,100
Videos
≈7,460
Links
≈24,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6h 01m
Average length
3m 35s

Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,299 reactions across 468 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍65828.6%
🔥44019.1%
👏35615.5%
🙏34615.1%
💯29212.7%
😢1084.70%
🕊572.48%
🥰271.17%
😱70.304%
😍50.217%
🎉20.087%
🍓10.043%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 484 of the 517 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,336 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 517 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 102 posts held from the last 30 days (0.98%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 07:26 UTC235 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

#Тафаккур_учун Бахил киши жаннатдан узоқдир Бисмиллаҳир Роҳманир Роҳийм. Аллоҳ таолога битмас-туганмас ҳамду санолар бўлсин. Пайғамбаримизга мукаммал ва батамом салавоту дурудлар бўлсин. Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам энг саховатли зот эдилар. У кишининг саховати олдида бошқа саховатпешалар ип эша олмас эди. Анас розияллоҳу анҳудан ривоят қилинади: «Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам одамларнинг энг яхши…

👏2

8 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC294 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Ҳудайбия воқеасида ҳамма саҳобалар Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга қарши туриб олишганда у зот соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга ким оқилона маслаҳат берган? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Убай ибн Каъб розияллоҳу анҳу18%
  2. Умар ибн Хаттоб розияллоҳу анҳу32%
  3. Умму Салама розияллоҳу анҳо44%
  4. Энди билиб оламан5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🙏2

8 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC286 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Хандақ жангида хандақ қазишни ким маслаҳат берган? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Убай ибн Каъб розияллоҳу анҳу23%
  2. Умар ибн Хаттоб розияллоҳу анҳу38%
  3. Салмон Форсий розияллоҳу анҳу34%
  4. Энди билиб оламан5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🙏2

8 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC266 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам одамларга қандай ҳолатда қарардилар? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Бошларини буриб қарар эдилар8%
  2. Бутун гавдалари билан тўлиқ бурилиб қарар эдилар83%
  3. Кўз қирлари билан қарар эдилар9%
  4. Энди билиб оламан0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🙏2

8 Nov 2026, 04:24 UTC685 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026

#Тафаккур_учун Яхшилик Бу ҳаётдан кетишингдан аввал, ундан ўзинг билан олиб кета оладиган нарсаларни олиб қол: солиҳ амал, соғлом ва пок қалб, махфий садақа, яхши бир сўз ҳамда инсонлар ҳаётида қоладиган гўзал из. Зеро, жўнаб кетганингдан кейин сендан қоладиган нарса дунёдан жамғарганинг эмас, балки охиратга тақдим этганинг ва сен таниган инсонлар қалбида қолдирган яхшилигингдир. Ҳофиз Умар Ҳофиз. https://t.m…

💯4👏2👍1

8 Nov 2026, 02:05 UTC998 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#Зикр Зикр Аллоҳга кўтарилган амалларнинг энг суюклиси ва илоҳий висолга етишмоқни истаган бандалар учун васила (сабаб)ларнинг энг гўзалидир. Ҳаққа бандалик қилишда зикрнинг ўрни беқиёс. Аллоҳ таоло Қуръони каримнинг жуда кўп ояти карималарида бандаларига кўпдан-кўп зикр қилишни, ҳатто душман билан олишаётганда ҳам зикрни канда қилмасликни буюради. «Ҳақиқий мўминлар фақат Аллох (номи) зикр қилинган вақтида қалблари…

👍3🙏2🍓1👏1

8 Nov 2026, 01:37 UTC878 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
File

📿 Тонги зикрлар Мишари Рашид Аль-Афаси. ♻️Дўстларингизга ҳам улашинг!!!h https://t.me/Bastomiy_uz

👍2

8 Nov 2026, 01:37 UTC≈1,450 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

🕌АССАЛОМУ АЛАЙКУМ🌹 🌷ЯКШАНБА ТОНГИ ХАЙРЛИ БЎЛСИН!🍃 Ҳаёт — манзилга етиш учун югуриладиган масофа эмас, ҳар бир лаҳзасини ҳис этиб яшаладиган сафардир. Биз кўпинча бахтни узоқлардан излаб, ўзимиздаги бор неъматларни сезмай қоламиз. 💐 Аслида, ҳақиқий бойлик — қалбнинг поклиги, кўнгилнинг хотиржамлиги, бировга яхшилик қилиш ва ҳар бир нафасда Яратганнинг ҳикматини ҳис эта билишдир. 🍁 Бугун ш…

👍2

7 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,560 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#хайрли_тун Тунингиз хайрли бўлсин! Тун таҳажжуд, қиёми лайл мадрасаси. Унда намоз, дуо, Қуръон ва тартийл бор. Унда руҳларга озуқа, қалбларга шайлик бордир. У шундай мадрасаки, ундан рисолатнинг залворли юки ва нубувват меросини кўтараётган мусулмон киши қувват ва садоқат билан ўша мадрасани тамомлаб чиқади. Аллоҳим, бизларни таҳажжуд намозига қоимлардан қилгин! 🤲🤲 https://t.me/Bastomiy_uz

🙏3👍2👏1🕊1

7 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTC≈1,560 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Набий соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам: «Ким бир мусулмоннинг айбини беркитса, ...», дедилар. Нуқталар ўрнини тўлдиринг. 📙 «Ижтимоий одоблар»

  1. Аллоҳ унинг айбини бу дунёда беркитади12%
  2. Аллоҳ унинг айбини охиратда беркитади25%
  3. Аллоҳ унинг айбини бу дунёю охиратда беркитади61%
  4. Энди билиб оламан1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💯6

7 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTC≈1,500 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Набий соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам: «Ким бир илмдан сўралса-ю, бас, у ўшани яширса, қиёмат куни Аллоҳ ...», дедилар. Нуқталар ўрнини тўлдиринг. 📙 «Ижтимоий одоблар»

  1. Уни ёқилғиси одамлар бўлган дўзахга ташлайди17%
  2. Унга назар солмайди47%
  3. Уни оловдан бўлган юган билан юганлайди29%
  4. Энди билиб оламан6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💯1

7 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTC≈1,490 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Тоҳа сурасининг 114-оятида Аллоҳ таоло Муҳаммад алайҳиссаломга нима дейишни буюрган? 📙 «Ижтимоий одоблар»

  1. Роббим, менинг қалбимни кенг қил22%
  2. Роббим, илмимни зиёда қилгин45%
  3. Роббим, ота-онамга раҳм қил29%
  4. Энди билиб оламан4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💯3🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 517 posts we hold for @Bastomiy_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 86 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz77 voters

Ҳудайбия воқеасида ҳамма саҳобалар Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга қарши туриб олишганда у зот соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга ким оқилона маслаҳат берган? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Убай ибн Каъб розияллоҳу анҳу18%
  2. Умар ибн Хаттоб розияллоҳу анҳу32%
  3. Умму Салама розияллоҳу анҳо44%
  4. Энди билиб оламан5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz77 voters

Хандақ жангида хандақ қазишни ким маслаҳат берган? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Убай ибн Каъб розияллоҳу анҳу23%
  2. Умар ибн Хаттоб розияллоҳу анҳу38%
  3. Салмон Форсий розияллоҳу анҳу34%
  4. Энди билиб оламан5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz77 voters

Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам одамларга қандай ҳолатда қарардилар? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Бошларини буриб қарар эдилар8%
  2. Бутун гавдалари билан тўлиқ бурилиб қарар эдилар83%
  3. Кўз қирлари билан қарар эдилар9%
  4. Энди билиб оламан0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz465 voters

Тоҳа сурасининг 114-оятида Аллоҳ таоло Муҳаммад алайҳиссаломга нима дейишни буюрган? 📙 «Ижтимоий одоблар»

  1. Роббим, менинг қалбимни кенг қил22%
  2. Роббим, илмимни зиёда қилгин45%
  3. Роббим, ота-онамга раҳм қил29%
  4. Энди билиб оламан4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz475 voters

Ибн Аббос розияллоҳу анҳумодан ривоят қилинган ҳадисга кўра, Набий алайҳиссалом қаерларни жаннат боғлари деб атаганлар? 📙 «Ижтимоий одоблар»

  1. Масжидларни19%
  2. Илм мажлисларини22%
  3. Етимлар яшайдиган уйларни57%
  4. Энди билиб оламан2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz467 voters

Набий соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам: «Ким бир мусулмоннинг айбини беркитса, ...», дедилар. Нуқталар ўрнини тўлдиринг. 📙 «Ижтимоий одоблар»

  1. Аллоҳ унинг айбини бу дунёда беркитади12%
  2. Аллоҳ унинг айбини охиратда беркитади25%
  3. Аллоҳ унинг айбини бу дунёю охиратда беркитади61%
  4. Энди билиб оламан1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 517 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BASTOMIY.UZ” (@Bastomiy_uz), 11,788 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bastomiy_uz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.