Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بَیان

Channel

بَیان

@Bayanz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,484subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001096710274
TypeChannel
Username@Bayanz
Descriptionمی‌خوانم. می‌نویسم. ایکس (توییتر سابق): https://x.com/farzad_bayan اینستاگرام: https://instagram.com/farzad.bayan
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bayanz

Growth

8,4508,4848,4676 August 2026 — 8,458 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,458 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,457 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,455 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,450 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,454 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,476 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,483 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,484 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,445–8,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 13:388,484+1
22 Aug 2026, 14:278,483+7
19 Aug 2026, 12:288,476+22
16 Aug 2026, 13:488,454+4
13 Aug 2026, 06:548,450-5
9 Aug 2026, 22:128,455-2
6 Aug 2026, 14:218,457-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:028,458no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:598,458first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 12 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.4%
avg views ÷ 8,484 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,890
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held23 (12 February 202623 August 2026)
Views total35,320
Reactions total1,659
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
173
Videos
104
Links
219

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,436 reactions across 23 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,436100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,436reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈2,430 views45 reactionsread 27 August 2026

فرصت همکاری: نویسنده و محقق (یوتوب) ✍️ چند پوزیشن شغلی در تیمم دارم برای افرادی که عاشق عمیق شدن در موضوعات و کندوکاو rabbit hole ها و نوشتن درباره‌ی آنها هستند؛ با تجربه و مهارت نگارش متون بلندِ تحقیق‌شده برای مخاطب عام. مشخصات فردی که به دنبال آن هستم: — توانایی نویسندگی و داستان‌سرایی قوی برای تبدیل ایده‌های پیچیده در قالب روایت‌هایی جذاب و ساده‌فهم به مخاطب عام. — توانایی تحقیق عمیق پیرامون یک موضوع در منابع

45

21 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈3,750 views318 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

به تصویر بالا نگاه کنید. وقتی از زنان می‌پرسند کدام‌یک از این پنج بازو را برای یک مرد ترجیح می‌دهید اکثراً گزینه‌ی ۳ را انتخاب می‌کنند. درصد قابل توجهی هم ۲ و ۴ را انتخاب می‌کنند؛ ولی به ندرت کسی سراغ گزینه‌ی یک یا پنج می‌رود. با این حال گزینه‌ی ۳ که پرطرفدارترین بازو برای یک مرد است، سایز بازوی میانگین در جامعه‌ی مردان نیست؛ بلکه دقیقاً کمی بزرگ‌تر از سایز بازوی میانگین است. و این اصلاً اتفاقی نیست. الگوی انتخاب

318

18 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈4,830 views72 reactionsread 27 August 2026

دعوت به همکاری: ادیتور ویدیو — سبک مستند یوتوبی — دورکاری Youtube Video Editor - Moden Documentary Style دفعه‌ی قبلی که اینجا آگهی دعوت به همکاری برای ادیتور گذاشتم، با افرادی توانمند و خلاق آشنا شدم که با بعضی از آنها الان نزدیک به ۲ سال است که همکاری می‌کنم. در این مدت چندین ویدیوی علمی انگلیسی‌زبان با بازدیدهای میلیونی ساختیم و یک کانال یوتوب را به بیش از ۱۵۰ هزار سابسکرایبر رساندیم. از همه مهم‌تر این که دائما

72

3 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈6,540 views225 reactionsread 27 August 2026

مهاجرت با چالش‌ها و عدم قطعیت زیادی همراه است که ذهن را مضطرب می‌کند. یک واکنش دفاعی رایج بین مهاجرها - به‌خصوص تازه‌مهاجرها - توجه افراطی به قوانین و مقررات کشور میزبان است. شخص هر لحظه درستی رفتارهایش را پایش می‌کند و حواسش هست که مرتکب کوچک‌ترین اشتباهی نشود تا مبادا به دردسر بیفتد. دردسری که در ذهن مهاجر مضطرب، درواقع یک فاجعه‌ی جبران‌ناپذیر است. با در دست داشتن معیاری قانونی برای تشخیص رفتار درست از غلط، فرد

225

31 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈7,860 views499 reactionsread 27 August 2026

این را اینستا پست کردم، بسیاری از کامنت‌ها این‌چنین است: خب طرف [در برنامه‌ی حکومتی] پیاده‌روی اربعین شرکت کرده، اشکالش چیه؟ خب طرف [سال‌ها سر بچه‌های مردم شیره میمالید که با تلاش و پشتکار رتبه برتر کنکور شده ولی بعد معلوم شد] سهمیه‌ای بوده، اشکالش چیه؟ خب طرف مجری صداو‌سیما [ی حکومتی] بوده، اشکالش چیه؟ خب طرف عملاً چهره‌ی فرهنگی رسانه‌ی حکومته، اشکالش چیه؟ حالا به فرضم که حکومتی باشه، مشکل فالو داشتنش چیه؟ ...

499

31 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC≈9,910 views500 reactionsread 27 August 2026

اخیراً به ویدیویی از مجتبی شکوری برخوردم که در کربلا بعد از پیاده‌روی اربعین ضبط کرده. ویدیو واکنش‌های زیادی به همراه داشت و خشم خیلی‌ها را برانگیخته. خاطرم هست چند سال پیش که خودش به سهمیه‌ای بودنش اعتراف کرد شاهد واکنش‌های مشابهی بودیم. برای من یکی، درد اصلی این نیست که امثال مجتبی شکوری رانتی و حکومتی‌اند؛ این واقعیت‌ها را چندسالی بود که می‌دانستیم. درد اصلی این است که خزعبلات همچین آدمی چند میلیون مخاطب دارد.

500

19 Jul 2026, 20:15 UTC≈9,960 views337 reactionsread 27 August 2026

کمتر از ۱۰ روز پیش نسخه‌ی جدیدی از حالت صوتی ChatGPT بیرون آمد. دیشب امتحان کردم و تجربه‌ی غریبی بود. برخلاف نسخه‌های قبلی که حرف آدم را نمی‌فهمید و وسط صحبت می‌پرید و کلافه می‌کرد، این‌یکی به طرز آزاردهنده‌ای طبیعی و روان است. این‌قدر طبیعی است که از طبیعی بودنش اذیت شدم. *** بعد از مدت‌ها اینستاگرام را نصب کردم و یک چرخ مفصل توش زدم. حرف از دهن آدم واقعی بیرون می‌آید، ولی کلمه به کلمه‌اش را هوش مصنوعی نوشته.

337

15 May 2026, 12:32 UTC≈10,500 views149 reactionsread 27 August 2026

کسی در توییتر پرسیده: «اینایی که این کاستوم‌های پلیس و پرستار و این چیزا رو می‌پوشن، وسط سکس از خنده پاره نمی‌شن جدی؟ حتی تصورش هم خنده‌داره برام. واقعن کی اینا رو می‌گیره و می‌پوشه؟ پرستار آخه؟ بعد چطور سناریو رو جلو می‌برن که خنده‌دار نمی‌شه و اروتیک می‌شه در عوضش؟ متوجه نمی‌شم.» سوال بامزه‌ایه که می‌شه چند نکته در پاسخ بهش مطرح کرد: مشابه بازیگرانِ یک تئاتر بداهه، در نقش‌آفرینی جنسی افراد وارد نقشی متفاوت از خو

149

14 May 2026, 10:25 UTC≈10,300 views221 reactionsread 27 August 2026

افراد اگرچه با هدف دستیابی به آزادی فردی مهاجرت می‌کنند، اما مادامی که کوله‌باری از بایدها و نبایدهای زندگی قبلی خود را به دوش بکشند، طعم آزادی را نخواهند چشید. @bayanz

221

6 May 2026, 22:47 UTC≈12,400 views218 reactionsread 27 August 2026

در این روزهای سخت، افراد بی‌شماری به خودکشی فکر می‌کنند و بسیاری دست به انجامش می‌زنند. چطور می‌تونیم به افراد درگیر خودکشی کمک کنیم؟ نکاتی رو از آثار «رونی کانر»، روان‌شناس و پژوهشگر حوزه خودکشی با شما درمیون می‌ذارم: ۱- مهم‌ترین نکته اینه عزیزانم: اگر کوچک‌ترین حسی کردید یا حدسی زدید که کسی ممکنه درگیر افکار خودکشی باشه، ازش مستقیماً سوال کنید: «فلانی، به فکر تموم کردن زندگیت هستی؟» (یا راحت‌تر: «ببینم فلانی، آیا

218

4 May 2026, 10:04 UTC≈8,970 views245 reactionsread 27 August 2026

بیاید استدلال‌های ویدیوی اخیر علی بندری با عنوان «چرا جنگ شد» رو به طور شفاف و مستقیم، بدون قایم شدن پشت اسم فلان کتاب یا نویسنده بررسی کنیم: ۱- بندری استدلال می‌کند که جنگ اخیر، نه در نتیجه به بن‌بست رسیدن دیپلماسی، بلکه در لحظه‌ای رخ داد که مذاکرات به شکلی بی‌سابقه در حال به ثمر نشستن بود. همین «نزدیک بودن توافق» برای آمریکا و اسرائیل تبدیل به زنگ خطر شد. آن‌ها به جای استقبال از صلح، آن را به عنوان بسته شدن یک «پن

245

25 Apr 2026, 09:32 UTC≈7,090 views164 reactionsread 27 August 2026

مسیح علی‌نژاد غیرمستقیم به رضا پهلوی توصیه کرده که کاری نداشته باش خبرنگار ازت چی می‌پرسه، شما صدای مردم باش و از جنایت‌های جمهوری اسلامی بگو براشون. درواقع می‌گه زیاد به صورت سوال توجه نکن، و حرفی که می‌خوای شنیده بشه رو بزن. علی‌رغم انتقادهایی که از مسیح سر این توصیه شد، به‌نظر میاد نکته و نگرانی به‌جایی برای پهلوی داره؛ هرچند لحن کلامش می‌تونست هم‌دلانه‌تر باشه تا کمتر مغرضانه تلقی بشه. وولف رویتر، سیاست‌مدار آ

164

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Bayanz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Bayanz edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Mar 2026, 10:21 UTCAnonymous Poll1,180 voters approx.

در نگاه اول، کدام‌یک از دو خبر بالا برای شما باورپذیرتر است؟

  1. خبر شماره ۱21%
  2. خبر شماره ۲64%
  3. هر دو به یک اندازه باورپذیرند15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 244,626 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

اَميرعلى قِ
@amiralichannel · 68,851
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بَیان” (@Bayanz), 8,484 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bayanz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.