Channel
@Bc716
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30,506subscribers
-14,680 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001917311388 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bc716 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bc716 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 30,506 | -1,072 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 31,578 | -835 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:13 | 32,413 | -255 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:26 | 32,668 | -259 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 32,927 | -255 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 33,182 | -628 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 33,810 | -665 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 34,475 | -718 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 35,193 | -439 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 35,632 | -1,952 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 37,584 | -2,468 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 40,052 | -1,426 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 41,478 | -641 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 42,119 | -384 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 42,503 | -369 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 42,872 | -369 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 43,241 | -220 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 43,461 | -392 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 43,853 | -593 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 44,446 | first reading |
553 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 553 (7 August 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 248,839 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 11:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 169 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#东南亚大事件 #花无缺 #汉堡 #麻雀 花无缺（福建籍）、汉堡（福建籍）、麻雀（现场管理）负责意大利刷单业务。面试时称西港数据排名第二。公司管理层均为福建籍，月业绩要求不低于2000万U，每名员工月费用不低于1.5万U（不含资源费）。承诺问题将解决，但问题发生后管理层未予处理，并于次日前往斯里兰卡。目前数十名员工未收到顾送费及工资提成，已持续两个多月。 ☎️ 免费爆料投稿：@Pu222 👨👨👧👧 东南亚大事件：@Bc716
#东南亚大事件 东南亚工作避雷曝光｜高振翔 照片中较胖者为高振翔，较瘦者为其朋友兼同乡，后被带至缅甸妙瓦底。 以下内容主要基于本人与高振翔相处期间的亲身经历及后续了解，涉及他人信息请自行核实。 高振翔，云南省普洱市宁洱哈尼族彝族自治县人，约于去年11月至柬埔寨拜林四期26区3组“飞翔”公司从事巴西股转币相关工作。 因代理关系较近，双方接触较多。初期高振翔称国内曾拥有较多资产，因赌博亏损外出工作；后续了解显示，其国内可能存在欠款及催债情况。 高振翔曾多次向本人借款，用于追求当地女性及日常消费，并存在赌博行为。四期管理转为非封闭后，其经济状况及生活方式更为明显：工资发放后因赌博导致资金损失，随后以回家为由再次借款，称计划前往缅甸妙瓦底工作。 照片中较瘦者为高振翔同乡，后被带至缅甸妙瓦底。据了解，该同乡疑似从事“精聊”相关工作，因无业绩遭遇罚款及殴打。在此之前，高振翔多次劝说本人前往妙瓦底，称当地工作条件优越。 本人现…
#东南亚事件：已在斯里兰卡停留三个月。最近与同事外出，多位同事结识当地女性，除肤色稍深外，外貌较为出众，引发兴趣。 询问其结识方式未获回应。特此询问群内成员当地女性之结识途径。单身三十年，现寻求与兰卡女性共度余生。 PS：传统技艺不可丢弃。🤣 ☎️ 免费爆料投稿：@Pu222 👨👨👧👧 东南亚大事件：@Bc716
在西港骑摩托车时，被交警拦下检查驾照，因无驾照被罚款500美元。 ☎️ 免费爆料投稿：@Pu222 👨👨👧👧 东南亚大事件：@Bc716
#东南亚大事件：寮国机场，请给旅客一个合理的说法。 持有效工作签证的旅客在寮国机场入境时，因未申请多次往返签证，被要求支付400美元费用。 签证若存在问题，应在入境时明确告知法律依据、收费标准及办理程序。若该费用为法定收费，需说明：收费依据、400美元标准的来源、是否提供正式官方收据，以及是否对所有同类情况旅客收取相同金额。旅客应有透明的申诉或确认渠道。 机场是国家对外的第一窗口。各国均有签证管理制度，外国人入境需遵守当地法律。但遵守法律与接受不透明处理方式不同。 旅客愿意承担未提前申请多次往返签证的责任，但无法接受在缺乏充分、透明、合理说明的情况下被要求支付400美元费用。该金额对一般旅客而言并非小额。 若寮国政府希望发展旅游、吸引外国工作与投资，机场执法与服务应做到公开、透明、依法、合理。要求包括：依法办事、清楚说明、公开收费、提供正式收据，以及告知旅客具体违反的规定。 希望寮国相关单位正视此类问题，避免旅客仅因…
#东南亚大事件：吉隆坡涉嫌诈骗的两人，通过定房方式骗取2500u……请大家注意此男性和女诈骗嫌疑人袁新彤，女方据称专门针对妈咪工进行诈骗，再歪曲事实，与该男性一同威胁，诈骗妈咪和女孩的钱。 ☎️ 免费爆料投稿：@Pu222 👨👨👧👧 东南亚大事件：@Bc716
#东南亚重大事件：西港蓝色海湾项目正在搬迁，疑似收到相关信息后撤离，此举或将对西港地区产生重大影响。 ☎️ 免费爆料投稿：@Pu222 👨👨👧👧 东南亚大事件：@Bc716
#东南亚大事件：在宿舍上厕所突然出现一条蛇 在宿舍使用蹲坑式厕所时，低头发现坑内盘有一条蛇。 该事件导致使用者产生恐惧反应。 ☎️ 免费爆料投稿：@Pu222 👨👨👧👧 东南亚大事件：@Bc716
#东南亚大事件：在东南亚的福建人有那些优点？ 闽南文化中的“抱团”与“宗族”观念，在合法商业中体现为团结优势，但在黑灰产中则形成高信任机制与低背叛风险。 一人带一村：黑灰产的扩散常呈现“一人暴富、全家跟进、全村效仿”的裂变模式。核心头目在获取暴利后，优先招募亲戚、同乡担任骨干，构建封闭团体，因此部分闽南人得以平安返回。 外省人士因缺乏类似团结，常因利益分配产生信任危机，导致部分人员被曝光或列入名单，难以安全返回国内。 ☎️ 免费爆料投稿：@Pu222 👨👨👧👧 东南亚大事件：@Bc716
#东南亚大事件：有些未曾到访东南亚的朋友询问，柬埔寨是否为男性的天堂？ 我向他们说明，这是一个差异显著的地方。当月收入为1000美元时，柬埔寨呈现工作密集的特点，涉及持续的办公工作、食堂用餐、宿舍居住以及个人休闲活动…… 当月收入达到10000美元时，柬埔寨展现更多休闲元素，包括各类娱乐场所、越南服务人员、休闲SPA、娱乐场所以及海边活动，生活方式多样…… 柬埔寨本身未变，只是不同的人对其有不同体验。大家对柬埔寨的印象如何？ ☎️ 免费爆料投稿：@Pu222 👨👨👧👧 东南亚大事件：@Bc716
真实姓名李鑫，山东省枣庄市某区某镇某村人士 艺名大地，目前带着管理团队在马来西亚吉隆坡三室一厅打野做国内资金盘股转，此人坑蒙拐骗背后还有一个老板叫山总(真实姓名我先不说了如果没有出来解决我的问题的后续我会曝光)现在给我拉公司利益，公司好的时候他妈的一个个的不拿人当人现在人回来了，你们跑路了开始拉公司的利益 和我他妈的有什么关系，把我的钱抓紧给我解决了如果不解决，所有事情我都会曝光出来，不管是你还是你后边的老板，又不是很多钱我就纳闷了当老赖当习惯了老家人都坑？如果短期内不给处理，你包括你背后的人我全部给你们开户了！都是前年的狐狸也别给我扯什么聊斋，这是给你最后的机会，如果还是不处理站在道德制高点给我说辞推脱下次你们全家人的信息包括跟你出去人的信息和你去投奔人的信息你们村的定位我会陆续都曝光出来
☎️ 免费爆料投稿：@Pu222 👨👨👧👧 东南亚大事件：@Bc716
Showing the 12 most recent of 553 posts we hold for @Bc716. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件吃瓜” (@Bc716), 30,506 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bc716.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.