Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎

Channel

︎ ︎ ︎ ︎

@BeEZT8

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003641232770
TypeChannel
Username@BeEZT8
Created15 January 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BeEZT8

Growth

71196 August 2026 — 8 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10 subscribers106 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 34 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 07:1910-1
31 Aug 2026, 00:2511+1
24 Aug 2026, 05:2310+3
15 Aug 2026, 15:247-1
12 Aug 2026, 13:328no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:258first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 15 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 2 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 59789948099336645912923.8%
custom 53731957029669746682117.2%
custom 5332823714759200293129.84%
custom 5222217036893017638108.20%
custom 5240250998978532072108.20%
custom 5418167184536928033108.20%
custom 540696509808014137097.38%
custom 541833549571532343997.38%
custom 526710527340684509243.28%
custom 528085030262540631321.64%
custom 520171690888112378310.82%
custom 526715616876929780710.82%
custom 526718570096442445810.82%
custom 526733941784394642010.82%
custom 526947183045170594510.82%
custom 527839989922898768910.82%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
60
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 2 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
46
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BeEZT8. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 3 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 January 2026 to 9 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Apr 2026, 19:11 UTC335 views12 reactions14 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Only 👠

custom 52671052734068450924custom 52808503026254063132custom 52017169088811237831custom 52671561687692978071custom 52671857009644244581custom 52673394178439464201custom 52694718304517059451custom 52783998992289876891

15 Jan 2026, 22:09 UTC860 views110 reactions46 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⛔IMessage 💼Anon ✈️Sign's 🔔Tik Tok 👠taken не отвечаю в течении часа — дублируй.⏰

custom 597899480993366459129custom 537319570296697466821custom 533282371475920029312custom 522221703689301763810custom 524025099897853207210custom 541816718453692803310custom 54069650980801413709custom 54183354957153234399

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @BeEZT8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“︎ ︎ ︎ ︎” (@BeEZT8), 10 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BeEZT8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.