美国网红惊叹于自由雕塑公园艺术作品的视觉冲击力,短短时间70多万粉丝 【陈维明】 source
❤12💩7🤡3👍2

Channel
@Beijing_64_1989
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,779subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001953079746 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Beijing_64_1989 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Beijing_64_1989 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 1,779 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 1,777 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 1,785 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 1,786 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 1,793 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 1,795 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 1,798 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 1,802 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 1,800 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 1,800 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 13 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 41 | 54.7% | |
| 🤡 | 20 | 26.7% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 9.33% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 4.00% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 25 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
美国网红惊叹于自由雕塑公园艺术作品的视觉冲击力,短短时间70多万粉丝 【陈维明】 source
❤12💩7🤡3👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤12
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4🤣2🤡1
#三个水枪手 0820-0918 E70 一段传奇!周锋锁在六四二十五周年涉险重返天安門, 跌宕起伏的故事 | 人道中国 | 天安门事件 | 民主运动 | 国安
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤡3❤1
1989年6月6日,大屠杀过后, 一北平市民冒着生命危险接受采访: source
🤡13🕊3
#李肃 禁忌史話:李銳日記秘密84|陳雲「借刀殺人」 李銳失寵 告別中組部
❤1
#李肃 0717-1302 禁忌史話:李銳日記秘密83|六四(7)胡耀邦下臺始末(下)總書記下台 號啕大哭
❤3
不明白播客 EP-159 林培瑞:去世八年,刘晓波给我们留下了什么? | 八九六四 | 零八宪章 | 天安门广场 | 我没有敌人 | 诺贝尔和平奖 | 煽动颠覆国家政权 | 自由派 | 丁子霖 |
#李肃 禁忌史话:李锐日记秘密82|邓小平「废储」 谁捅刀子?
李肃 禁忌史話:李銳日記秘密81|六四(5)胡耀邦下台始末(上)八六学潮 八九的先声 89-64资讯频道
#李肃 禁忌史話:李銳日記秘密80|六四(4):一場採訪,終結了總書記的政治生命 89-64资讯频道
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Beijing_64_1989. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“89-64资讯频道” (@Beijing_64_1989), 1,779 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Beijing_64_1989.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.