Channel
@BestPrincesses_MLP
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
234subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002920728257 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BestPrincesses_MLP |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BestPrincesses_MLP |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:05 | 234 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 231 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 230 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 230 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
234 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 161 | 68.8% | |
| custom 5316852432192422522 | 22 | 9.40% | |
| custom 5449739338805954014 | 19 | 8.12% | |
| custom 5269586570503011685 | 15 | 6.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 4.27% | |
| custom 5314756372187858556 | 2 | 0.855% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.855% | |
| custom 5267188827700610866 | 1 | 0.427% | |
| custom 5422454931992886449 | 1 | 0.427% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.427% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня день рождения у нашего замечательного админа, @SainttCelestine !😜 У неё сейчас непростые времена и совсем нет времени на группу...🥺 Но я верю, что в итоге всё у неё будет хорошо. С ДНЁМ ВАРЕНЬЯ!😌 Желаю, что бы все твои планы на будущее исполнились в самом лучшем для тебя виде!😃 И конечно же побольше поней в жизни 💃😄🤩😁😃😯👍🍏👏🙂❤️🦄😁😇🥱👍
❤9custom 52695865705030116852
Signed Happy Hamster
🪙И ещё один пост от подписчика🦄 🐠☀️летняя селестия! парная к такой же луне :3 тгк: @aahwunit32
❤10🍓2custom 52695865705030116852
Signed Happy Hamster
✨Просто рисуночек Селестии🦄
❤12custom 52671888277006108661
Signed Happy Hamster
Подорвала тюрьму, в которую её посадили пару постов назад😎 (Ни один пони не пострадал, Селестия их всех телепортировала вместе с собой😁)
custom 544973933880595401411❤2
Signed Happy Hamster
Пост от подписчика🍹 🐠🌜летняя луна! у меня есть очень прикольная идея для брелочка с ней, скоро будет еще и селестия :3 тгк: @aahwunit32
❤8❤🔥1
Signed Happy Hamster
Сеть Telegram-каналов «Узы Дружбы» 👩⭐️ Здесь вы можете найти самые разные каналы и почувствовать настоящую дружбу. В этой сети есть всё, что нужно: любые каналы на любой вкус — яркие, разнообразные и действительно лучшие. Находите то, что близко именно вам — и наслаждайтесь контентом этой шикарной сети. 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆 Зайдите все каналы разом ⬇️ ⭐️Папка со всеми каналами⭐️ Наш центральный канал 😇 👩Узы Дружбы 👩 👆👆👆…
Signed 💗Глеб💗
Какая то странная фотосессия) Ну вы можете себе представить чтобы Луну с Селестией арестовали?))))
❤9🏆1custom 53168524321924225221
Signed 💗Глеб💗
Жиза
❤9
Signed 💗Глеб💗
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52695865705030116859❤3❤🔥1
Signed 💗Глеб💗
"Дружбой и пистолетом вы можете добиться гораздо большего, чем одной только дружбой"
❤10
Signed 💗Глеб💗
Доброе утречко чтоли)
custom 53168524321924225228❤3
Signed 💗Глеб💗
Photo, posted without a caption
❤11❤🔥4
Signed 💗Глеб💗
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BestPrincesses_MLP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BestPrincesses_MLP named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Best princesses forever|MLP” (@BestPrincesses_MLP), 234 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BestPrincesses_MLP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.