#Scammer 100% ⛔️ Best Tips Co = SCAMMER 100% ‼️ 🎙From A fan : Having a scammer to report, Paid him $ for 40 odd which he scammed me and stop replying my chat. Don't trust these Scammers ! Share Channel To Your Friends and groups to avoid scamming and help people. ♻️✔️ @BetclubCom

Channel
! Scam Alert ! | Bet Club
@BetClubCom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16,603subscribers
+1,549 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001246550085 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BetClubCom |
| Description | 🔰 Bet Club | Scam Alert 🚫 😇 Bet Club Community Built on Trust and Helping Each Other! ❤️🩹 🎖️ Legit Sources Links : @BetClubLegit ➖Introduce Scammers and Real Sources. ➖Learn Best Betting Strategies 👤 Admin : @BetClubContactt ❗️Report Scammers |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BetClubCom |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 16,603 | -127 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 16,730 | -271 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 17,001 | -249 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 17,250 | -175 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 17,425 | -105 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 17,530 | -260 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 17,790 | +5,882 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 11,908 | -297 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 12,205 | -221 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 12,426 | -105 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 12,531 | -193 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 12,724 | -104 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 12,828 | -133 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 12,961 | -420 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 13,381 | -263 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 13,644 | -147 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 13,791 | -68 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 13,859 | -225 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 14,084 | -174 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 14,258 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 44.2%
- avg views ÷ 16,603 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,340
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (24 June 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 51,390 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 838
- Videos
- 41
- Links
- 151
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 25s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🧐 Many of our members ask us: “Are there any legit Fixed Match sources out there?” 🔍 Since 2019, Bet Club has been testing, verifying, and exposing fixed match scammers. We’ve lost money ourselves, tested dozens of sellers, and after 5 years, we’ve narrowed it down to just 5 trusted sources that actually deliver. 🎯 These aren’t public pages with loud claims. They’re private, low-profile, and personally vetted by us…
✅ Legit and verified source review from members... --Source Username: @Fixed_Lord --Admin : @BossWilsonn 🔰 This source has been tested and verified as legit source! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 📌 Because of your requests we decided to post some of bet club members reviews about sources we verified as legit, Text me for more details about this source ! Share Channel To Your Friends and groups to avoid scamming and help people.…
✅ Legit and verified source review from members... --Source Username: @Rich_Wizard --Admin : @FixedMatchesWizard 🔰 This source has been tested and verified as legit source! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 📌 Because of your requests we decided to post some of bet club members reviews about sources we verified as legit, Text me for more details about this source ! Share Channel To Your Friends and groups to avoid scamming and help…
Scammer 100% ⛔️ Derrick Viens = SCAMMER 100% ‼️ Don't trust these Scammers ! Share Channel To Your Friends and groups to avoid scamming and help people. ♻️✔️ @Betclubcom
🤍 About the Fixed Matches Sources We Found Legit After several years of researching and testing different sources, we have identified a few that meet our standards. ⚠️ Always check any source with us before purchasing from them. This helps you avoid scams and protects your money. Our goal is to reduce fraud in this space. Never buy from any source without verifying it first. ✅ If you want to see our analysis and g…
✅ Legit and verified source review from members... --Source Username: @FixedCity --Admin : @FixedCity_Support 🔰 This source has been tested and verified as legit source! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 📌 Because of your requests we decided to post some of bet club members reviews about sources we verified as legit, Text me for more details about this source ! Share Channel To Your Friends and groups to avoid scamming and help pe…
Scammer 100% ⛔️ Tony Pickford = SCAMMER 100% ‼️ Don't trust these Scammers ! Share Channel To Your Friends and groups to avoid scamming and help people. ♻️✔️ @Betclubcom
✅ Legit and verified source review from members... --Source Username: @FixedCity --Admin : @FixedCity_Support 🔰 This source has been tested and verified as legit source! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 📌 Because of your requests we decided to post some of bet club members reviews about sources we verified as legit, Text me for more details about this source ! Share Channel To Your Friends and groups to avoid scamming and help pe…
✨ I can’t change the direction of the wind, but I can adjust my sails to always reach my destination. 🖊 Jimmy Dean --Tip For Betting and life-- #Quote #Wallpaper #tips @BetClubCom
Scammer 100% ⛔️ Slim Jim = SCAMMER 100% ‼️ Don't trust these Scammers ! Share Channel To Your Friends and groups to avoid scamming and help people. ♻️✔️ @BetclubCom
i’m ✅ Legit and verified source review from members... --Source Username: @Phantom_Fixed --Admin : @SuppPhantom 🔰 This source has been tested and verified as legit source! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 📌 Because of your requests we decided to post some of bet club members reviews about sources we verified as legit, Text me for more details about this source ! Share Channel To Your Friends and groups to avoid scamming and help …
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @BetClubCom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,143,173 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BetClubCom named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“! Scam Alert ! | Bet Club” (@BetClubCom), 16,603 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BetClubCom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.