Channel
@BetterTelegramUsage
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001744189556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BetterTelegramUsage |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BetterTelegramUsage |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 24 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 25 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 24 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 24 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 13 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 minutes that will change your life on Telegram FOREVER! We are showing JUST SOME!!! of the features available, which make TELEGRAM THE BEST SOCIAL WORLDWIDE! (even if people still don't understand that 🤦♂️ ...) https://t.me/NoComparisonTelegram YES, TELEGRAM IS THE BEST SOCIAL FOR SCIENCE TOO! https://t.me/GenRevolutionOfficial/212 More infos https://t.me/JoinShareableChatFolders/16 Music by https://t.me/Pikayz
Telegram @JoinShareableChatFolders for Dummies: a) we noticed now, that no premium user cannot see more than 100 channels ... in this case you can use for example our max 100 channel list https://t.me/addlist/eaqHVCVl4lZlYTIx https://t.me/addlist/q0dAcDb0RSc5NmQx until Telegram fix such issue in some ways ... b) you DON'T NEED to join all channels if you are not interested. You can join all and remove them later or…
Telegram stands for animal, planet and human rights - Channel list https://t.me/RightsTelegram 🤜🤜 https://t.me/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx 🤜🤜 (2) https://t.me/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx 🖇🤜https://t.me/addlist/l6ip-Sstsa8wZDIx 🖇🛡 https://t.me/addlist/pL2yDj4ErKNjNjBh 🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx 🖇🌍 https://t.me/addlist/PnM6poGtTtwwMzcx 🖇💡https://t.me/addlist/nTyay5rBWD5jNzJh
Do you think that just Telegram search is shit? Well, think again. Twitter search is 💩 too, both for searching users or posts, like Facebook https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/339 (both posts and pages!) YouTube, especially for videos https://t.me/rtpannouncements/850 but TikTok etc. is nothing better too. And yes, even Google results! like previously reported. Conclusion: you need to be smart everywhere! since most soc…
Oh Telegram, ... we released a message about how to search posts with 🧠 https://t.me/grannouncements/334 because searching on channel at the end is not so bad, even if this could be improved BUT searching channels IS JUST 💩. YES 💩, SHIT, 💩! Here we go again with another example, where Telegram show NO SENSE channels to what we are searching.
☠️☠️Terrorism Facts☠️☠️
Why Telegram directories are shit? We already wrote about that https://t.me/TgmeFreaks/887 https://t.me/TgmeFreaks/399 https://t.me/TgmeFreaks/428 https://t.me/TgmeFreaks/1026 Let we see another example. Looking the picture it means they approved our "all in one" channels, but rejected the single channels, EVEN IF THE ALL IN ONE CHANNEL got approved and CONTAINS the single channels ... Our comment "just idiots..." t…
We already talked that you need to SLOW DOWN on Telegram. Let we check this example, where an "i" is making huge difference, even if there are just 3 results at the beginning! Again, be smart when you search channels!
Telegram search is and remain shit! Remember that they can hide usernames at all. Even if you purchase Fragment usernames ... This is an issues available for all type of topics or languages. Not only because @x is not available and x is not available too, means @x doesn't exist! Write @x in a chat and click that!
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @BetterTelegramUsage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 178,832 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telegram 2.0 - Telegram like never before: start using Telegram properly” (@BetterTelegramUsage), 24 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BetterTelegramUsage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.