Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ah Betty!!!

Channel

Ah Betty!!!

@Bettyhoney

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

93subscribers

-88 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004338114423
TypeChannel
Username@Bettyhoney
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bettyhoney

Growth

6118112110 August 2026 — 181 subscribers10 August 2026 — 181 subscribers17 August 2026 — 105 subscribers25 August 2026 — 61 subscribers1 September 2026 — 88 subscribers10 September 2026 — 93 subscribers9310 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net -88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43–199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 14:3893+5
1 Sept 2026, 03:2888+27
25 Aug 2026, 05:0461-44
17 Aug 2026, 13:04105-76
10 Aug 2026, 08:15181no change
10 Aug 2026, 08:01181first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52715396982909479276242.8%
custom 53372917563523405183222.1%
custom 52695090248685026962617.9%
custom 5402073658610974521138.97%
custom 519299427268455953842.76%
custom 527373123112353172042.76%
custom 541355454427983496832.07%
custom 582546295330597128410.69%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Bettyhoney. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC42 viewsread 10 August 2026

Добейте 40 реакций, тогда, возможно, сегодня выложу переписку с Джеймсом, а не завтра #Betty

9 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC63 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ребята, быстрее бегите читать! Это просто волшебно🥹🥹🥹 #Betty

custom 53372917563523405184custom 52695090248685026962custom 52715396982909479271

9 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC61 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ketrindemuVideo

˚. NEW POST ᶻ 𝗓 𐰁 LINK 𝄃𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄀𝄁𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄃𝄃𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄀𝄁𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄃𝄃𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄀𝄁𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄃𝄃𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄀𝄁𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄃𝄃𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄀𝄁𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄃𝄃𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄀𝄁𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄃𝄃𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄀𝄁𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄃 ver : «ты будешь моей?» 𓍯𓂃 #BLAISEZABINI #messenger 𓍯𓂃 ожп : @Rochelle_de_Vernan 𓍯𓂃 for @Bettyhoney ⤷ ゛ прочитать можно в комментариях! ˎˊ˗

custom 52715396982909479276custom 52695090248685026962custom 53372917563523405181

9 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC64 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rochelle_de_VernanPhoto

``~"🤍nfin, j’ai enfin retrouvé ma préférée !! 🤍 on a passé une journée absolument merveilleuse ensemble !! on a tellement discuté, rigolé et pris plein de photos ၄၃ elle me manque déjà énormément alors qu’on vient à peine de se dire au revoir :( je t’aime tellement !! 🌸 . ˳ ִ ۫Mon cher🤍

custom 53372917563523405182custom 52695090248685026961custom 52715396982909479271

9 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC78 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ребята, Кэтрин наконец-то создала свой ТГК. Вы могли видеть её в тт. давайте поддержим и подпишемся на эту прекрасную даму🥹🤍 https://t.me/ketrindemu #Betty

custom 54020736586109745214custom 52715396982909479272custom 52695090248685026961

9 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC91 views42 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤ ︶݄ۜᩘۣ݇⏝ᩫּؔۜᩘ ִ𝅗𝅥 𝆭 𝅄 ʾ они пишут вам пьяными ———————————————— #goldentrio`` #marauders `` #allcharacter #MESSAGES`` video in tiktok ———————————————— все можно прочитать в коммах!

custom 527153969829094792723custom 53372917563523405188custom 52695090248685026966custom 51929942726845595381custom 52737312311235317201custom 54020736586109745211custom 54135545442798349681custom 58254629533059712841

8 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC118 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

🤍ы в отношениях —

  1. #BLAISEZABINI36%
  2. #JAMESPOTTER53%
  3. Ваш вариант в коммах11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 54020736586109745218

8 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC118 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rochelle_de_VernanPhoto

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ``~"🤍ujourd’hui, je voulais simplement prendre un café, mais j’y ai ִׄ 𝂅ׄ . finalement passé presque toute la journée. 🍼 J’ai l’impression de me laisser encore trop facilement distraire par les beaux endroits. ֪ ☁️ 𝆬ׄ Mais est-ce vraiment une mauvaise chose?🥹 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 52715396982909479275custom 52695090248685026963custom 53372917563523405183

8 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC105 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Селеста, спасибо за звездочку!🥹 #Betty

custom 53372917563523405183

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Bettyhoney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTCFinal Results75 voters

🤍ы в отношениях —

  1. #BLAISEZABINI36%
  2. #JAMESPOTTER53%
  3. Ваш вариант в коммах11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ah Betty!!!” (@Bettyhoney), 93 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bettyhoney.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.