Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BigSharks by BigShah

Channel

BigSharks by BigShah

@BigSharksCrypto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,409subscribers

-324 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002150613826
TypeChannel
Username@BigSharksCrypto
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BigSharksCrypto

Growth

9,4099,7339,5717 August 2026 — 9,733 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,724 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,693 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,671 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,640 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,610 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,572 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,539 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,500 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,462 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,409 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net -324. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,360–9,782 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 00:369,409-53
4 Sept 2026, 01:379,462-38
31 Aug 2026, 07:269,500-39
27 Aug 2026, 22:249,539-33
24 Aug 2026, 19:239,572-38
21 Aug 2026, 00:229,610-30
17 Aug 2026, 16:159,640-31
14 Aug 2026, 00:369,671-22
11 Aug 2026, 02:319,693-31
8 Aug 2026, 02:329,724-9
7 Aug 2026, 13:169,733first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

403 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
25262.5%
😭5112.7%
🔥368.93%
👍194.71%
😍102.48%
😁81.99%
🤣81.99%
😱71.74%
🤔40.993%
🥰30.744%
❤‍🔥20.496%
🍌20.496%
👏10.248%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2025 to 13 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 May 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,430 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

I have my eyes on these upcoming NFT projects https://x.com/BigShahCrypto/status/2054542879125602698

👍61

Signed Big Shah

6 Feb 2026, 00:04 UTC≈3,210 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

📊 JUST IN : Bitcoin hits $62,000 @BTC_Tick

😱76

Signed Big Shah

9 Nov 2025, 15:32 UTC≈4,810 views118 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Guys, we will be starting Forex learning sessions from tomorrow. It's always better to diversify our portfolio. There's alot of potential in FOREX and we should reap the benefit. 🤑 Tomorrow 10:30pm PK time Location : This telegram channel, hope to see you guys here.

80🔥21😍10🤣4🍌2🤔1

Signed Big Shah

29 Oct 2025, 09:12 UTC≈5,310 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026

📢 Metamask Airdrop — Season 1 Point Farming Live. ◻️ You’ll get points for every swap or perp trade, and those points could mean something big soon ● First of All Update your Metamask Wallet on your Mobile Phone. ● OR Uninstall current Wallet & Download again Registration Link — https://link.metamask.io/rewards?referral=92R9GP Referral Code — 92R9GP (for 250 Bonus Points.) ◽️ More Points More Reward 🔻 1 swap

12

Signed Big Shah

26 Oct 2025, 14:27 UTC≈3,860 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Register with your oldest ETH wallet https://token.megaeth.com/ Potential project

3🤔3

Signed Big Shah

17 Oct 2025, 12:25 UTC≈4,830 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Guys, if you have spent gas fees on ETH network, connect your wallet and earn point, also complete the tasks. www.ethgas.com/community/onboarding?referral=8GJ6HNZ

6

Signed Big Shah

13 Oct 2025, 15:57 UTC≈4,310 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrency_mediaPhoto

📈👀 Total DeFi TVL decreased by ~13.5% during the weekend crash, but is already recovering strongly, adding nearly 8% in the last 24h.

7

Signed Big Shah

10 Oct 2025, 21:24 UTC≈4,100 views64 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Worst crash in crypto history is here.

😭51😁85

Signed MR INNOVATOR

26 Aug 2025, 10:49 UTC≈6,380 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026

$Epic gave us a 120% profit on spot. This is not a meme coin it's a legit project backed by XRP. And they have a Crypto debit card coming as well get your spots reserved CA : 0x94314a14Df63779c99C0764a30e0CD22fA78fC0E Video link : https://www.instagram.com/reel/DN0LsbkxLZi/?igsh=MTh2YW9lbnduMHB0Zw==

20🔥5

Signed Big Shah

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BigSharksCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Waqar Zaka
@waqarzaka · 215,338
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Faizan Haroon
@faizanharoontelegram · 52,807
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Crypto.kiran
@cryptowithkiran · 37,577
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
Crypto With Jeet
@jeetshahhcrypto · 79,263
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
Crypto Taha Free Group
@CryptoTaha11 · 28,775
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Spy on Gems 🧐 with Mayank Dudeja
@spyongems · 49,395
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
💰Coin Vault💰Signal / Setup - MemeCoin - Giveaways - Airdrops -
@DailyCryptoGiveaway · 45,005
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BigSharks by BigShah” (@BigSharksCrypto), 9,409 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BigSharksCrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.