Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BIG STRATEGIC πŸ‘‘πŸ†

Channel

BIG STRATEGIC πŸ‘‘πŸ†

@Big_Strategic

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

9,479subscribers

+98 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001318602098
TypeChannel
Username@Big_Strategic
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Big_Strategic

Growth

9,3819,6449,512.514 August 2026 β€” 9,381 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 9,409 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 9,389 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 9,644 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 9,567 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 9,523 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 9,503 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 9,479 subscribers9,47914 August 20263 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,342–9,683 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 19:409,479-24
31 Aug 2026, 10:269,503-20
28 Aug 2026, 00:049,523-44
24 Aug 2026, 19:289,567-77
20 Aug 2026, 22:239,644+255
18 Aug 2026, 04:549,389-20
15 Aug 2026, 01:159,409+28
14 Aug 2026, 12:319,381first reading

Engagement

154 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
5.37%
avg views Γ· 9,479 subscribers
Avg views / post
509
154 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.518%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
154
of 154 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 95 of 154 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held154 (13 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total78,349
Reactions total255
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

255 reactions across 91 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀13151.4%
πŸ”₯3714.5%
😈197.45%
πŸ‘187.06%
πŸ‘166.27%
🀯83.14%
πŸ™51.96%
πŸ₯°51.96%
πŸ†41.57%
🀣41.57%
πŸ‘Ž31.18%
✍20.784%
❀‍πŸ”₯20.784%
😒10.392%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 154 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC242 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

VIIIIIIIIIIIP πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ AND THE WINS CONTINUE.

❀1

28 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC359 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Stake what you can afford Bet code U7MTJM

❀3πŸ†1

28 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC364 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Best decision I made for VIP yesterday was - skipping Europa games and allowing them to sail. Zero regrets so far. My VIP is my wallet. Everything is calculated.

πŸ”₯2

28 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC445 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026

So should we do it on sportybet?

❀7πŸ‘2πŸ”₯1

28 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC453 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

1.30 odds rollover with 10k for 10 days is how much?

❀1

28 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC454 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

BET OF THE DAY ON 1XBET Registration πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/4qUYWgQ PROMO CODE : COMRADE1X πŸŽŸοΈπŸ’°

28 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC431 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

1st half over on Conners Code: NA82J REG LINK: https://afropari.life/4wDV0Ub πŸ“² Use promo code STRATEGIC to enjoy a bonus on your first deposit. 🎁 APP LINK: https://afropari.life/466yCrt πŸ“± Stake what you can afford πŸ™

✍1

28 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC441 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Dear Universe........... E don boom!

πŸ”₯5❀1😈1

27 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC443 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

My next giveaway will come with a crazy casino game to win using my signal call cheat code. It will be available to those that signed up correctly under me Until then....!

πŸ‘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 154 posts we hold for @Big_Strategic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

OnGOD
@ongod139 Β· 56,412
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here β€” alongside 81 others β€” read 21 August 2026
Gameboy
@gameboyboy Β· 249,122
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here β€” alongside 86 others β€” read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œBIG STRATEGIC πŸ‘‘πŸ†β€ (@Big_Strategic), 9,479 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Big_Strategic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.