Mostly Traders keep changing that's why the fail 📉 💯

Channel
BilalFx Academy📉👑
@BilalfxAcademy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,065subscribers
-207 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001340729004 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BilalfxAcademy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BilalfxAcademy |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 3,065 | -28 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 3,093 | -17 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 3,110 | -23 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 3,133 | -23 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:23 | 3,156 | -17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 3,173 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 3,190 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 3,199 | -22 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 3,221 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 3,235 | -20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 3,255 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 3,270 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 3,272 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 3,272 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 83.3% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Truth About Market 📈 💯
BITCOIN UPDATE ✅ Bitcoin price surges towards resistance area as we expected,Hope you all make some profits from my idea, Bitcoin is currently testing a major resistance area; let's see how it reacts. A break above this resistance will continue the upward movement.
👍1
Bitcoin accumulation is strengthening after months of distribution. Smaller and mid-sized wallets are leading the buying, with accumulation increasing across most investor groups. 👉 According to Glassnode, this broad-based accumulation has historically marked the early stages of longer-term recoveries. 📈
Bitcoin started flying again after being retested back to the support area. With the price slowly moving towards the resistance area around $66,000 - $67,000, as expected 👍
BITCOIN UPDATE ✅ Bitcoin tested $62,000 Level and bounced back from it. This is a positive sign, and the market moved as we expected. The resistance area remains unchanged.
❤1👍1
BITCOIN UPDATE✅ Price Should Hold current level $62000 to gain momentum towards $66,000 - $67000 Major Resistance Zone, in case of breakdown from current level we may see support at $60K - $59.5K level, high probability that we may hold $62000 because Price is trying to break downtrend channel👍
👍1
I am doing another strategy backtest. As soon as I get good results, I will provide you with a signal and all our SLs will recover. Don't worry for now you can trade on your owner strategy and risk managements You know I always try to give Ideas that i use for myself 👍
Friends, in the Forex market, it is difficult to say that you should work on the same strategy for a long time and win. As you have seen, I used to give you signals based on the same strategy that were profitable before.But now the same strategy is giving us a very bad one-rate,
Gold Sell at 4484 TP 4472 SL 4490❌
Gold Sell at 4484
entery not confirmed wait
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BilalfxAcademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@RidingExtreme · 207,458
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
@techdishoomofficial · 31,557
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
@UPSC_SSC_RAILWAY_BANKING_GK · 133,428
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@parthfoster · 22,668
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BilalFx Academy📉👑” (@BilalfxAcademy), 3,065 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BilalfxAcademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.