#PuyPuy LArtoria Dangerous Beast 128P22V #写真 #cosplay

Channel
某不知名藏馆 网红 Cosplay 二次元 写真
@BiliCosplay
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
31,624subscribers
+13,545 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003489063282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BiliCosplay |
| Description | 原图压缩包在对应预览图的评论区获取 频道内写真,图集均为30岁以上老阿姨拍摄(确信) 主要收藏分享Cosplay,写真资源。偶尔也会发点其他的 觉得不错请发发评论或点下表情回应❤️,你的反馈就是我的动力~ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 30 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BiliCosplay |
Topic
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 25% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:37 | 31,624 | +227 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:42 | 31,397 | +171 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:00 | 31,226 | +204 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:37 | 31,022 | +256 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 30,766 | +155 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 30,611 | +193 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 30,418 | +205 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:35 | 30,213 | +230 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:29 | 29,983 | +262 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:59 | 29,721 | +291 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:05 | 29,430 | +121 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:36 | 29,309 | +120 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:50 | 29,189 | +172 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:10 | 29,017 | +179 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:17 | 28,838 | +194 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:35 | 28,644 | +159 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 28,485 | +183 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:21 | 28,302 | +157 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 00:50 | 28,145 | +177 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:38 | 27,968 | first reading |
Engagement
557 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 142 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.84%
- avg views ÷ 31,624 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 898
- 208 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.386%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 210
- of 557 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 158 of 208 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 557 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 186,772 |
| Reactions total | 568 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 11:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,500
- Videos
- ≈46
- Links
- ≈59
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 19m 14s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,112 reactions across 352 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 758 | 68.2% | |
| 👍 | 269 | 24.2% | |
| 🎉 | 27 | 2.43% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 2.07% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 0.809% | |
| 🎃 | 7 | 0.629% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 0.45% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 0.45% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.36% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.09% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.09% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.09% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.09% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 356 of the 557 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 557 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 553 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BiliCosplay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 557 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 210 posts held from the last 30 days (9.05%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#二佐Nisa 白发修女 51P #写真 #cosplay #黑丝
❤3
#二佐Nisa 橙发修女 26P #写真 #cosplay #白丝
❤3
#阿薰kaOri 女巫 162P12V #写真 #cosplay #黑丝
👍5❤1
#杂图 #推特 ↓↓超清大图↓↓
❤2
Posted without readable text
SiftQ:完全免费的H3视频生成工具,支持破甲 上传一张图,即可生成2K视频 ❤️ 支持NSFW、AV、成人18+等无限制内容生成 💗 提供API服务,可批量生成,嵌入到你的应用和工作流 👉 点击免费试用 🙎♀️ 客服 @yyyyyb5
#九柒喵 蔚蓝档案 妃咲JK 61P #写真 #cosplay #白丝
❤7👍3
#亚马逊鲶鱼 送货员 91P #写真 #cosplay
👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1👍1
#Seele麦麦 布洛妮娅生日月 理之律者 61P #写真 #cosplay #白丝 #腿控
❤2
#雨波HaneAme Black Bible黑暗圣经&北見老師&白木學姊 70P11V #写真 #cosplay
❤4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 557 posts we hold for @BiliCosplay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @BiliCosplay as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 30 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 16 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 4
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@JBCATrepository · 22,0296 posts落雨夜猫黄油频道2(重建版)
@nightcat_main_2 · 45,9366 postsGalgame分享频道
@xiaomenggalgame · 20,2035 posts星空咖啡馆免费黄油gal库
@xinkongkafei · 15,0265 posts乐搜 LetsTG
@letstg_official · 74,3623 posts频道索引&推荐
@recommend3 · 106,9083 posts精选优质3d同人动画收藏
@r18mmd1 · 23,4402 posts小喵的ACG黄油 (重开版)
@xiaomiaogame · 131,3432 posts公诸同好 | 二次元美图分享 🅥
@gongzhutonghao · 38,9301 post男性乳头玩弄(乳首責め)色图与资源频道
@nippleplaysetu · 7,0911 post男娘coserの涩涩小屋
@suamimparthut · 25,3351 post安卓黄油の领域(转世重生ver)❤️
@thomasaua · 117,6081 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@exhentaibackupchinese · 23,8406 postsGalgame分享频道
@xiaomenggalgame · 20,2036 posts安利 (NSFW)
@qingan567 · 162,1125 posts落雨夜猫黄油频道2(重建版)
@nightcat_main_2 · 45,9364 posts涩涩收藏~
@Hbookmark · 12,6063 posts成人影片精选集 sese.best1
@sesebest1 · 6,6643 postsRe:4从一开始的鸭鸭频道
@Yayayagroup114 · 24,0253 posts免费黄油 | gal.games
@FreeGalgame · 168,1782 postsGalgame仓库
@Galgamee · 18,7942 posts涩涩同人动画在线播放🎦
@sssacg · 90,6382 posts鸣潮涩涩收藏夹
@wutheringwavesR18 · 82,2782 posts小喵的ACG黄油 (重开版)
@xiaomiaogame · 131,3432 posts[NSFW]堕落帧语|涩涩次元
@XiaTiYa_520 · 118,3902 posts星空咖啡馆免费黄油gal库
@xinkongkafei · 15,0262 posts动画&插画分享(NSFW)
@Hanime0721 · 19,7781 post精品黄油收藏夹 | 每日推荐
@hhooca · 52,3091 post🎰JBCAT优质壁纸走私
@JBCATrepository · 22,0291 post欢乐汇:沙雕&涩涩&美物&趣闻
@memehumorcollection · 5,1391 post男性乳头玩弄(乳首責め)色图与资源频道
@nippleplaysetu · 7,0911 post男性乳头玩弄(乳首責め)交流群
@nippleplaytaolun · 3,6381 post里番文化遗产工程:索引
@r18animation · 125,8701 post男娘coserの涩涩小屋
@suamimparthut · 25,3351 post安卓黄油の领域(转世重生ver)❤️
@thomasaua · 117,6081 post安利安利[NSFW]
@zijianzhang710 · 148,5611 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BiliCosplay named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 27 August 2026 · confirmed gone 17 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 October 2026 – 9 October 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“某不知名藏馆 网红 Cosplay 二次元 写真” (@BiliCosplay), 31,624 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BiliCosplay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.