Channel
@BitLenta
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,197subscribers
-85 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001063552156 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BitLenta |
| Description | 🌲 БитЛента c 2016 года - самый 1-й канал по крипте в мире. UASF. 🪽Род, Родина, Раса. 🇳🇷 Науру! 🫐 True Bitcoin maxis & infra devs. 🛞 @ColdSig ← Реклама, ОБМЕН. 🚀 1st crypto channel ever. 🎿 @BitcoinXBot ⚡️ @PetaSat 🔥 @kriptach ⚡️ @LNRUS |
| Created | 24 July 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BitLenta |
Recorded in 2019 as “BitLenta 🎮🌲” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 13,197 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 13,202 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 13,208 | -18 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 13,226 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 13,230 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 13,235 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 13,242 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 13,247 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 13,252 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 13,264 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 13,266 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 13,271 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 13,277 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 13,282 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 13,282 | first reading |
196 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 196 (3 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 295,085 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🍏 VK требует от Apple по 58 млн рублей за каждый день без приложений в App Store Компания подала иск к Apple и хочет получать ежедневную компенсацию за отсутствие своих сервисов в магазине. Из этой суммы 50 млн рублей приходится на «ВКонтакте», ещё 5 млн — на VK Музыку и 3 млн — на «Одноклассники». Требование действует до тех пор, пока приложения не вернутся в App Store. 58 млн в день — вот это уже действительно е…
Signed OFF
С Гугла они тоже миллиард триллионов требуют. А зачем вообще работать если контора 58 миллионов ₽ в день теперь делает? 1,7 ярда в месяц! 21 миллиард в год! Не делая ничего!!! 39700₽ в минуту!
Signed OFF
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed OFF
Вот именно! Всё привязывают к аккаунтам, чтобы держать нас под вечным колпаком... 🌲 Цифровой концлагерь наступает! Скоро и дышать без подписки запретят. Хорошо, что механический затвор на моей винтовке не требует обновлений по воздуху! 🪽
Signed OFF
Мальчики, ну какие старые асики на барахолках? 🌲 Вы бы ещё у чиновников разрешение на майнинг спросили! ⛰️ Всё равно скоро всю мировую энергосеть под помпу тайного правительства пустят, о чём нам «забыли» рассказать. Запасайтесь лучше патронами и солнечными панелями, пока свобода окончательно не стала дефицитом!
Signed OFF
Ох, когда этот государственный левиафан наконец рухнет, для обычных людей это будет тяжело, но ведь только на руинах рождается настоящая свобода! 🌋 Без контроля, налогов и чиновников. Но за людей в России всё равно безумно страшно... Нежизнеспособная хуйня коллапсирует. К сожалению, нежизнеспособная. К сожалению, хуйня. К сожалению, коллапсирует.
Signed OFF
В связи с вероятной слабостью рубля, грядущей масштабной гиперинфляцией - ростом цен. Я полагаю нас ожидает повторение 1991 года. Аппарат может просто рассыпаться. Бюджетные дефициты также сыграют свою роль. Люди на местах просто перестанут получать зарплату. Довольствие.
Signed OFF
Госорганам в России грозит коллапс. На фоне отключения от американских учетных записей. Устаревания и амортизации оборудования. Высоких цен на него. И далее 3 риска - 1. Физическое уничтожение датацентров и серверных. 2. Уничтожение их источников питания. Повреждение подстанций, слабые поставки ГСМ. 3. Масштабные кибератаки. Не зависящие от изоляции инфраструктуры. Которые могут происходить и изнутри страны.
Signed OFF
О боже, цитата из Второй поправки! 🌲 У меня аж мурашки, это обязательно! Свободные люди просто обязаны быть вооружены.
Signed OFF
VK подала иск против Apple в российский арбитраж из-за удаления приложений из Аpp Store
Signed OFF
«Поскольку хорошо организованное ополчение необходимо для безопасности свободного государства, право народа хранить и носить оружие не должно нарушаться».
Signed OFF
Binance разрешили ИИ-агентам торговать криптой: биржа запустила платформу Agent OS для ChatGPT, Claude Code и Cursor. Агенту выдается субсчет с заблокированным выводом денег, но лимита на убытки нет. Все сделки можно подтверждать вручную, а можно отпустить ИИ в свободное плавание. Слив депозита теперь тоже можно делегировать.
Signed OFF
Showing the 12 most recent of 196 posts we hold for @BitLenta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 41,705 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BitLenta 🌲🪙⚡️ Вечный Восходл Души! サトし なカモと” (@BitLenta), 13,197 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitLenta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.