Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بلیچ | Bleach

Channel

بلیچ | Bleach

@BleachFarsi_Tv

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,781subscribers

-819 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002001578108
TypeChannel
Username@BleachFarsi_Tv
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BleachFarsi_Tv

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,78115,60015,190.58 August 2026 — 15,600 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,600 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,580 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,558 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,530 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,512 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,497 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,463 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,433 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,415 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,389 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,379 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,364 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,344 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,317 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,290 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,272 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,252 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,239 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,212 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,192 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,171 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,143 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,125 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,082 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,038 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,954 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,912 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,896 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,867 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,824 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,781 subscribers8 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -819. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,658–15,723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:5514,781-43
16 Sept 2026, 22:1914,824-43
15 Sept 2026, 03:1714,867-29
13 Sept 2026, 13:1614,896-16
11 Sept 2026, 19:1814,912-42
9 Sept 2026, 09:3814,954-84
6 Sept 2026, 02:5715,038-44
3 Sept 2026, 20:3915,082-43
2 Sept 2026, 09:2315,125-18
1 Sept 2026, 10:3615,143-28
31 Aug 2026, 07:4415,171-21
30 Aug 2026, 10:5615,192-20
29 Aug 2026, 08:0715,212-27
28 Aug 2026, 06:4415,239-13
27 Aug 2026, 03:2815,252-20
26 Aug 2026, 02:1815,272-18
25 Aug 2026, 00:3815,290-27
23 Aug 2026, 09:0315,317-27
21 Aug 2026, 18:0915,344-20
20 Aug 2026, 17:5215,364first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.40%
avg views ÷ 14,781 subscribers
Avg views / post
503
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held78 (1 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total18,114
Reactions total358
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 29s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

672 reactions across 72 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23535.0%
🤣14020.8%
🔥13119.5%
❤‍🔥11417.0%
👻192.83%
💋101.49%
👀71.04%
💯60.893%
🗿60.893%
🤝30.446%
🌚10.149%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 672 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 10:10 UTC62 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @MoviesGoldAnimeVideo

بنظرتون واقعا بلیچ تمام میشه ؟! 🔥 ارسالی ممبر @YNWA1a 🙂‍↔️ @MoviesGoldAnime

Signed Miss Rosaline

2 Sept 2026, 20:30 UTC220 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

کپشن با شما 🙂‍↕️🔥 🔥ارسالی ممبر عزیزمون @Amirotakosan1 @BleachFarsi_Tv

🌚1🔥1

Signed Miss Rosaline

2 Sept 2026, 16:49 UTC316 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

یه سالاد شیرازی معذرت😆😆😆 انیمه: BLEACH #میم

🤣201

Signed Miss Rosaline

1 Sept 2026, 20:18 UTC386 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

جنگ خونین هزارساله ❌ کباب‌پزی هزارساله با یوهاباخ ✅😂

🤣20

Signed Miss Rosaline

1 Sept 2026, 20:15 UTC388 viewsread 3 September 2026

چقدر ۲۰۰۸ ترسناک بود ۲۰۲۶ گوگولی شد

Signed Miss Rosaline

1 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC387 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

خالق بلیچ هر بار با یه ظاهر جدید رونمایی میکنه😭 خالق مانگای BLEACH جناب تایته کوبو #فان

🤣7❤‍🔥2👻21

Signed Miss Rosaline

1 Sept 2026, 05:26 UTC453 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

وضعیت ‌فن‌های بلیچ برای قسمت بعد🙂😆 انیمه: BLEACH #میم

🤣154🔥2

Signed Miss Rosaline

30 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC515 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🧠 بچه‌ها یه سؤال سخت… اگه یه اتفاق جادویی بیفته و تمام خاطراتتون از Bleach پاک بشه… 👀 حاضرین دوباره از قسمت اول شروعش کنید، بدون اینکه حتی یه اتفاق از داستان یادتون باشه؟ ⚔️ همون حسِ اولین ورود به Soul Society 🔥 همون غافلگیری‌ها 💀 همون لحظه‌هایی که اصلاً انتظارشون رو نداشتید… حاضری؟ یا بعضی چیزا رو فقط یک‌بار می‌شه تجربه کرد؟ 👇

23🗿4🤝3❤‍🔥2

Signed Miss Rosaline

30 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC554 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

تنها کویینسی که واقعاً دفترچه راهنما رو می‌خونه! افتاد به جون هاشوالت😭 اوریو توی انیمه 👀🔥 انیمه: Bleach #اسکرین_شات

🔥12👻7

Signed Miss Rosaline

30 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC589 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

بمونه یادگاری از پارت آخر بلیچ 🙂‍↔️

15

Signed Miss Rosaline

30 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC504 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

انتظار 10 داشتم ولی خب چشم حسودا کور هنوز پله اول دستشه

19

Signed Miss Rosaline

29 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC571 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026

بچه ها توجه کنید پایانش نیست یه قسمت دیگه داریم انگاری

💯6

Signed Miss Rosaline

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @BleachFarsi_Tv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بلیچ | Bleach” (@BleachFarsi_Tv), 14,781 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BleachFarsi_Tv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.