برای ورود به vip بر روی لینک زیر بزنید فرصت بسیار محدود https://t.me/+D7zssOcN7X5kODA0
❤1

Channel
@Blockchain_Academies
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
29,713subscribers
-597 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001172674535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Blockchain_Academies |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Blockchain_Academies |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 29,713 | -14 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 29,727 | -18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 29,745 | -14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 29,759 | -33 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 29,792 | -53 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 29,845 | -44 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:14 | 29,889 | -19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 29,908 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:44 | 29,925 | -20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 29,945 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 29,960 | -13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 29,973 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 29,981 | -22 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 30,003 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 30,007 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 30,023 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 30,034 | -25 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 30,059 | -25 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 30,084 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 30,101 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 15 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (15 February 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,920 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 06:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
79 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 38.0% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 31.6% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 16.5% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 7.59% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.53% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
برای ورود به vip بر روی لینک زیر بزنید فرصت بسیار محدود https://t.me/+D7zssOcN7X5kODA0
❤1
📌 ایلان ماسک: تا سال ۲۰۳۶ پول دیگه اهمیتی نداره! 🖥 ایلان ماسک توی مصاحبه جدیدش گفته گسترش هوش مصنوعی و رباتیک تا سال ۲۰۳۶ میتونه تولید کالا و خدمات رو اونقدر زیاد کنه که پول کلاً اهمیتش رو از دست بده. 🔸 ماسک معتقده تو چنین شرایطی، به جای تورم، کاهش قیمتها به بزرگترین چالش اقتصاد جهانی تبدیل میشه و کالاها خیلی بیشتر از نیاز انسانها تولید میشن. 🔸علاوه بر این توی مصاحبهاش توضیح داده که ارزش پول به دسترسی …
🌟 بونوس واریز اوربیت ویژه همه کاربران واریز 20$ ⏪ 5$ بونوس واریز 100$ ⏪ 25$ بونوس واریز 300$ ⏪ 75$ بونوس واریز 1,000$ ⏪ 100$ بونوس ✔️ شرایط دریافت: 🔽 واریز از منابع خارجی باشه 🔽 شماره تلفن تأیید شده باشه 🔽 پرداخت بونوس هر جمعه 🔽 هر شخص یکبار میتونه این پاداش رو بگیره 🎁 همین الان واریز کن و جایزهتو بگیر! 🍀https://www.ourbit.com/register?inviteCode=QLZ9ME
🔥5❤4👏4💯1
💰 بیت کوین در آستانه از دست دادن ۶۰٬۰۰۰ دلار؛ هدف بعدی BTC کجاست؟ 📊 کندل روزانه ببیت کوین برای اولین بار از سپتامبر ۲۰۲۴ زیر سطح ۶۰٬۰۰۰ دلار بسته شده و این حمایت مهم حالا داره به یک مقاومت جدید برای خریدارها تبدیل میشه. 🔸این افت قیمت همزمان با ریزش شدید بازارهای سهام افتاد، تا جایی که بورس کره جنوبی بعد از سقوط ۸ درصدی توقف اضطراری معاملات رو فعال کرد. 🔸دادههای تورمی آمریکا نشون میده که تورم همچنان بالاتر…
👍6🔥3👏1
📊در حال حاضر 8 معاملهگر از 10 معاملهگر برتر رمزارز ZEC در صرافی هایپرلیکویید، پوزیشن های لانگ دارن. 🔼
👍6🔥6❤1🫡1
💰 داستان بزرگترین باگ تاریخ بیت کوین؛ روزی که ۱۸۴ میلیارد BTC جعلی ساخته شد! 📊 توی ۱۵ آگوست ۲۰۱۰ یکی از بزرگترین باگهای تاریخ بیت کوین رخ داد. به عبارت دقیقتر توی بلاک شماره ۷۴۶۳۸، یه تراکنش به طور اشتباه بیشتر از ۱۸۴ میلیارد بیت کوین ایجاد کرد؛ رقمی که خیلی بیشتر از سقف ۲۱ میلیون واحدی BTC هست. 🔸این اتفاق به خاطر یه مشکل فنی توی بررسی خروجی تراکنشها رخ داد. مقدار خروجیها به قدری بزرگ بود که موقع محاسبه، با…
👍8❤1😢1
🥇 بانک گلدمن ساکس پیشبینی خودش از قیمت طلا رو ۵۰۰ دلار کاهش داد؛ چرا تحلیلگرها به رشد طلا امیدوار نیستن؟ 📊 گلدمن ساکس پیشبینی خودش از قیمت طلا تا آخر ۲۰۲۶ رو ۵۰۰ دلار کاهش داد و اعلام کرد هدف جدیدش ۴٬۹۰۰ دلاره. 🔸این بانک اعلام کرد به خاطر احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره چنین تصمیمی گرفته؛ چون طبق برآوردهای جدید اولین کاهش نرخ بهره ممکنه تا ۲۰۲۷ به تعویق بیفته. 🔸تحلیلگرهای گلدمن ساکس معتقدن چشمانداز بلندمدت طلا همچنان مث…
🔥8👍4❤1💯1
افزایش تقاضای طلا در آسیا با وجود نوسانات بازارهای مالی، تقاضای فیزیکی طلا در هند و چین همچنان قابل توجه است. طلا همچنان بهعنوان یکی از مهمترین داراییهای امن در شرایط عدم قطعیت اقتصادی تلقی میشود 🚀@Blockchain_Academies
👍4⚡1👏1
ایردراپ soso رو کلیم کنید💰 sosovalue.com/exp
📌 بیت کوین در نبرد با تنشهای ژئوپلیتیکی و تورم بالا؛ امیدی به شروع یک رالی جدید هست؟ 📊 بیت کوین با وجود افزایش تنشهای ژئوپلیتیکی و رشد تورم آمریکا، تونست بالای محدوده ۶۳٬۰۰۰ دلار بمونه و حمایت ۶۰٬۰۰۰ دلار رو حفظ کنه. 🔸بر اساس تحلیل QCP Capital، بازارها همزمان در حال قیمتگذاری ریسک تشدید تنشهای سیاسی و احتمال اختلال توی بازار انرژین موضوعی که باعث کاهش تمایل سرمایهگذارها به پذیرش ریسک شده. 🔸در همین حال، شاخص ق…
اگه دارایی روی rari دارید برداشت بزنید چون این شبکه داره خداحافظی میکنه!
💰 هجوم نهنگهای آسیایی به بازار ریپل! XRP در آستانه یک جهش بزرگه؟ 📊 ژاپن و کره جنوبی به یکی از مهمترین بازارهای ریپل تبدیل شدن؛ جایی که سالها نرخ بهره پایین و رکود اقتصادی باعث شد سرمایهگذارهای خرد دنبال داراییهای پرریسکتر برن. 🔸همون فرهنگی که ژاپن رو به بزرگترین بازار معاملات فارکس خرد دنیا تبدیل کرده، حالا وارد بازار کریپتو شده. خیلی از سرمایهگذارهای آسیایی XRP رو پلی بین بانکداری سنتی و دنیای کریپتو میدو…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Blockchain_Academies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗕𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗔𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗺𝘆 | آکادمی بلاکچین” (@Blockchain_Academies), 29,713 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Blockchain_Academies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.