Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BlueRever (Main)

Channel

BlueRever (Main)

@BlueRever_official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,818subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001615733999
TypeChannel
Username@BlueRever_official
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BlueRever_official

Growth

1,8181,8291,823.516 August 2026 — 1,828 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,829 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,827 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,822 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,821 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,818 subscribers16 August 20262 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 17 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,816–1,831 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 10:081,818-3
30 Aug 2026, 11:131,821-1
24 Aug 2026, 19:251,822-5
20 Aug 2026, 19:221,827-2
17 Aug 2026, 17:571,829+1
16 Aug 2026, 20:451,828first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.84%
avg views ÷ 1,818 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held11 (4 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total155
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2781.8%
🆒39.09%
👌13.03%
💯13.03%
🔥13.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @database_hupFile

File, posted without a caption

1

Signed Phantom 10

15 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC34 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Here’s a collection of valuable PDFs and practical guides on cybersecurity and bug bounty hunting, I’ve put these together to help u sharp your skills, learn advanced web security concepts, and step up your hunting game. Hope you find them helpful By @phantom10_x

2

Signed Phantom 10

11 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC83 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026

عمرك فكرت إزاي Google Authenticator بيطلعلك كود شغال وأنت عامل Airplane Mode؟ يعني بدون انترنت، بدون شبكة، وموبايلك -أوفلاين- حرفيًا مش بيتواصل مع أي Server ومع ذلك أول ما تكتب الـ 6 أرقام، الموقع يعرف فورًا إن الكود صح! طب السيرفر عرف منين الكود اللي ظهر عندك؟ الفكرة أذكى وأبسط مما تتخيل. أول مرة بتعمل Setup للـ Authenticator وتمسح الـ QR Code، بيتم مشاركة Secret Key بين التطبيق والسيرفر. بعد كده محدش محتاج يبعت أ

1

8 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC115 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026

لأول مرة، نجح علماء في تصميم فيروسات بمساعدة الذكاء الاصطناعي، في خطوة علمية تفتح أبواباً هائلة للبحث، لكنها تثير في الوقت نفسه مخاوف بيولوجية كبيرة. الفكرة ببساطة أن نماذج الذكاء الاصطناعي أصبحت قادرة على تحليل البنية الجينية والتنبؤ بكيفية تطور بعض الفيروسات أو تعديل خصائصها. هذا قد يساعد العلماء على فهم الأمراض بشكل أسرع، وتطوير لقاحات وعلاجات أكثر دقة. لكن الجانب المقلق هو أن هذه الأدوات نفسها قد تُستخدم بشكل غ

1

1 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC186 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026

🎞️الإختراق عبر صورة 🚨 برمجية خبيثة جديدة تستغل صورة باندا مولدة بالذكاء الاصطناعي لاستهداف أنظمة Linux. كشف باحثون في الأمن السيبراني عن Koske، وهي برمجية خبيثة تستخدم ملفًا من نوع Polyglot، حيث يبدو الملف كصورة عادية، بينما يحتوي في الوقت نفسه على تعليمات برمجية يمكن تنفيذها في ظروف محددة. وبحسب التحليل، تستهدف البرمجية الخوادم التي تعمل بنظام Linux، خاصة تلك التي تحتوي على JupyterLab مكشوف على الإنترنت. وبعد نجاح

3

29 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC211 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

☣️ BlueVenom — C2 & Payload Generator BlueVenom هو إطار عمل متقدم للأمن السيبراني والـRed Teaming، يجمع بين C2 (Command & Control) وPayload Generation في منصة واحدة. يدعم المشروع بناء حمولات متعددة المنصات مثل: 🪟 Windows 🐧 Linux / Termux 🤖 Android ويضم لوحة تحكم C2 لإدارة الأجهزة المتصلة، استقبال النتائج، إرسال الأوامر، ومتابعة الأحداث بشكل مباشر. كما يتضمن المشروع: • 🌐 قنوات اتصال متعددة مثل TCP وHTTP/HTTPS وUDP • 🔗

2

24 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC226 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026

في البوستين اللي فاتوا اتفقنا على قاعدة ذهبية: الـ Hashing طريق في اتجاه واحد، ومستحيل نعمله Decryption ونرجعه للباسورد الأصلي. طيب سؤال منطقي جداً... لما قاعدة بيانات بتتسرب والهاكرز بياخدوا الـ Hashes، بنسمع إنهم "كسروا" الباسوردات وقدروا يدخلوا على الحسابات! عملوها إزاي طالما الـ Hash مابيرجعش لأصله؟ سحر؟ أكيد لأ.. السر هنا في أدوات كسر كلمات المرور (Password Cracking)، وأشهرهم وأعرقهم على الإطلاق: John the Ripper

2

20 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC205 views5 reactionsread 16 August 2026

هو ليه المواقع مبتخزنش الـ Password بتاعك زي ما كتبته؟ تخيل إنك عملت أول موقع ليك. المستخدم دخل وسجل حساب جديد، وكتب كلمة المرور: MyPassword123 أنت استقبلت البيانات، وروحت خزنتها في قاعدة البيانات زي ما هي. في اللحظة دي ممكن تحس إن كل حاجة تمام... لكن الحقيقة إنك عملت واحدة من أخطر الغلطات الأمنية. ليه؟ تخيل إن بعد فترة موقعك اتعرض لاختراق، والهاكر قدر يحمل نسخة من قاعدة البيانات. لو أنت مخزن كلمات المرور بال

5

17 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC182 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026

زاي بيتم تخزين الباسورد فعلا؟ تخيل إنك فتحت جدول الـ Users في قاعدة البيانات، وبصيت في عمود اسمه PasswordHash. بدل ما تلاقي الباسورد بشكل واضح زي: Ahmed@123 لقيت حاجة بالشكل ده: $argon2id$v=19$m=65536,t=3,p=4$VGVzdFNhbHQ$RmluYWxIYXNo أول رد فعل طبيعي: إيه الداتا الغريبة دي؟ 😂 هل السطر ده كله هو الـ Hash؟ ولا فيه أجزاء تانية متخزنة معاه؟ وهل لو حد سرقه يقدر يفكه ويرجع الباسورد؟ علشان نفهم ده، لازم نبدأ من الأول

4🆒3

4 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC321 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026

هنا يتدخل علم البيانات (Data Science). بينما ينظر CVSS إلى الخطورة التقنية، ينظر EPSS إلى "الاحتمالية المستقبلية" بناءً على نماذج التعلم الآلي. - الآلية: يحلل النظام بيانات التهديدات الحالية، ونشاط الويب المظلم، ونوع الثغرة، ليخرج بنسبة مئوية (مثلاً 85%). - المعنى: تعني النسبة أن هناك احتمالية 85% أن يقوم المهاجمون بتطوير أداة لاستغلال هذه الثغرة خلال الـ 30 يوماً القادمة. هذا يساعد المؤسسات الضخمة على إدارة ترقيع آل

3🔥1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @BlueRever_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بتاع شغل
@shogll · 352,955
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BlueRever (Main)” (@BlueRever_official), 1,818 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlueRever_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.