3 measurements spanning 10 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115–116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 20:37
115
-1
2 Sept 2026, 17:03
116
no change
1 Sept 2026, 19:45
116
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
136.2%
avg views ÷ 115 subscribers
Avg views / post
157
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
9 (31 August 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
1,410
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4
66.7%
👎
2
33.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BEFORE:
Folders Update — Main Screen
Userflows:
1. Create Folder - 4 clicks
Edit → Create New Folder → [Name, Chats, etc.] → Create → Close
2. Add Chats to Folder - 6 clicks
Edit → Select Folder → Add Chats → [Select Chats] → Save → Save → Close
3. View Included Chats - 4 clicks
Edit → Select Folder → [Viewing Chats] → Save → Close
Design:
1. The dark background of the folders takes too much attention. Right n…
BEFORE:
Folders Update — Edit Folder
Design:
The folder icon on the right is used to change the folder icon. In 'Topics', the icon that represents the field is placed on the left, so users might expect to find it there. When the folder icon sits next to the emoji button, users see it as another action and miss its real purpose.
AFTER:
Folders Update — Main Screen
Userflows:
Create Folder - 2 clicks
New Folder → [Name, Chats, etc.] → Create
Add Chats to Folder - 1 click
Just Drag & Drop
View Included Chats - 0 clicks
Just Hover
Design:
1. The folders now have a light background. It gives full focus to the conversations.
2. The Edit button is moved to the bottom of the panel. This separates folders from the actions. It makes the panel …
AFTER:
Folders Update — Edit Folder
Design:
The folder icon was moved to the left side. This is now consistent with the "Topics", where the icon also sits on the left. The placement is also more logical, because the icon on the left works as a label that shows what the field is for.
BEFORE:
Stars Improvements — Gift Stars & Get Stars
Userflow:
Gift Stars - 5 taps (Starting from Chat)
Back → Settings → My Stars → Gift Stars to Friend → Select Friend → [Select and pay]
Design:
1. The place where users find the stars for gifts is hard to reach and not intuitive. Users have to open several screens that are not related to gifts, which makes the feature hard to discover.
2. The text inside the c…
AFTER:
Stars Improvements — Gift Stars & Get Stars
Userflow:
Gift Stars - 2 taps (Starting from Chat)
Attach → Stars → [Select and pay]
Design:
1. Stars are now added as a tab inside the attachments menu. This makes the user flow much simpler. The new placement fits the way users already think about sending content and removes the need to look through unrelated screens.
2. The space between the cards is now red…
Updated message input and attachment process in the Telegram Desktop
The current attachment interface obscures the conversation view and blocks interaction with the messenger. This often causes inconvenience — when typing a message, it’s frequently important to maintain context and see previous messages you’re replying to. Also, when composing a message or a post for a channel, users often need to check other chats …
Signed News and Tips
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Boegyman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Design competition Files” (@Boegyman), 115 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Boegyman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
