Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 50 days, net -6,124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 113,582–121,544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 21:40
114,501
-867
17 Sept 2026, 16:20
115,368
-135
15 Sept 2026, 15:19
115,503
-193
13 Sept 2026, 23:41
115,696
-178
12 Sept 2026, 09:36
115,874
-256
10 Sept 2026, 09:40
116,130
-281
7 Sept 2026, 07:00
116,411
-229
4 Sept 2026, 10:57
116,640
-149
3 Sept 2026, 02:03
116,789
-139
2 Sept 2026, 01:43
116,928
-113
1 Sept 2026, 04:29
117,041
-138
31 Aug 2026, 03:36
117,179
-164
30 Aug 2026, 00:27
117,343
-102
29 Aug 2026, 00:12
117,445
-117
27 Aug 2026, 23:56
117,562
-148
26 Aug 2026, 23:05
117,710
-137
25 Aug 2026, 21:38
117,847
-85
24 Aug 2026, 23:24
117,932
-215
23 Aug 2026, 06:57
118,147
-198
21 Aug 2026, 17:38
118,345
first reading
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.321%
avg views ÷ 114,501 subscribers
Avg views / post
368
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
46 (13 May 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
3,311
Reactions total
142
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 21:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
73
Videos
20
Links
33
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
670 reactions across 42 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
230
34.3%
🔥
209
31.2%
❤
90
13.4%
👀
43
6.42%
👏
25
3.73%
🙊
12
1.79%
👌
8
1.19%
🙈
8
1.19%
⚡
7
1.04%
😁
7
1.04%
🤔
4
0.597%
🆒
3
0.448%
🏆
3
0.448%
👻
3
0.448%
💊
3
0.448%
🗿
3
0.448%
🤝
2
0.299%
🤷♂
2
0.299%
🦄
2
0.299%
🍌
1
0.149%
5 further kinds
5
0.746%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 670 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
36/50. BlackRock changed nothing about Bitcoin and still created the fastest growing fund in financial history.
For 10 years the richest buyers in the world refused Bitcoin because of everything around it: wallets, exchanges, private keys and the fear of doing something wrong. In January 2024 American regulators approved spot Bitcoin ETFs, and BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager with about 10 trillion dolla…
35/50 ⚫️ EOS raised 4 billion dollars, the largest amount ever collected by a crypto project, and its own creator abandoned it less than 2 years after launch.
In 2017 and 2018 a company called Block.one ran a token sale for EOS that lasted a full year and collected around 4 billion dollars, still the biggest fundraise in crypto history. The project was led by Brendan Blumer, a serial entrepreneur, and Dan Larimer, a…
34/50. Chainlink turned the most boring sentence in business into 10 years of content, and became the standard of its industry.
Chainlink sells data feeds to smart contracts, meaning it delivers real world information, like prices, onto the blockchain, present on every chain and allied with none.
Its co-founder, Sergey Nazarov, had already tried and failed at 2 earlier startups before this one, and he built Chainli…
33/50. Polymarket was banned for American users, and the FBI raided the founder's apartment right after it called the election before any TV network did.
Polymarket lets people bet on real world events with crypto, and for years it was dismissed as a gambling site. Its founder, Shayne Coplan, dropped out of New York University to build it in 2020, and one of his early investors was Peter Thiel, the Silicon Valley bi…
32/50. MetaMask was built by an English literature major and a Japanese and Chinese studies major, who thought the project would take a couple of weeks.
Dan Finlay studied English literature, Aaron Davis studied Japanese and Chinese, and neither one looked like a classic blockchain developer. They met in 2013 working on VoxelJS, an open source Minecraft clone meant to teach kids to code in the browser. In 2016, now …
31/50 A real crypto address is 42 random characters nobody can remember or pronounce. ENS replaced it with a name ending in .eth, and then the marketing engine started on its own: people began putting their .eth names directly into their Twitter display names. Every tweet, every reply and every viral post became a free ad for the naming system, placed voluntarily and proudly by its own owners. In 2021 ENS deepened th…
30/50. Andre Cronje built the YFI token, and within a month it was worth more than 1 Bitcoin. He kept 0 tokens for himself.
Andre Cronje was born in Cape Town, South Africa. He earned a law degree at Stellenbosch University, worked as a lawyer for a short while, got bored, and switched to computer science instead. For years after that he worked ordinary jobs in IT and fintech consulting, not standing out from thousa…
29/50. El Salvador became the first country to make Bitcoin legal money, and the debate about it became years of free advertising.
In September 2021 El Salvador made Bitcoin legal tender, the first country ever to do it. As economic policy, the experiment is debated to this day, and that debate is precisely what made it priceless as marketing, because a whole state had become the brand ambassador.
El Salvador’s pre…
By January 2022 the crypto market was cooling, and OHM had been sliding with it for weeks, but the community held the line: the meme promised that selling was not an option. Then came the night of January 17. Around 2 am a large early holder known as shotta_sk sold part of his position: 82,526 OHM for 11 million dollars in a single transaction. The price collapsed from 186 to 104 dollars in less than an hour, a casca…
👍5🔥5👀4🙊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @Bogdan_and_Xena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Bogdan_and_Xena edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 September 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Domains linked from posts
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bogdan & Xena” (@Bogdan_and_Xena), 114,501 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bogdan_and_Xena.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.