Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BOKS BUGUN 🥊

Channel

BOKS BUGUN 🥊

@Boks_Bugun

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

22,621subscribers

+16,071 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003777465978
TypeChannel
Username@Boks_Bugun
DescriptionBOKS UFC MMA Sport olamidagi eng qaynoq yangiliklar✨ Jonli efirlar Oʻzbek tilida Biz bilan doim oldinda boʻling
Created25 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Boks_Bugun

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

22,700 average views per post against 22,760 subscribers — an engagement rate of 99.8%. Across the 779 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,024–31,567 subscribers, posting mainly in Turkish — the middle half sit between 4.47% and 20.1%, with a median of 9.52%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured36 of 36 published in the window (0 exact, 36 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled817,940
Mature posts only97.1% over 28 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers22,760 measured 4 November 2026
Cohortb10000:tur · 779 channels · p10 1.65% · p25 4.47% · p50 9.52% · p75 20.1% · p90 32.9%
Position in cohort99.229th percentile · 10.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.021% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageTurkish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,51224,51415,5138 August 2026 — 6,550 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,512 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,595 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,336 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,571 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,414 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,303 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,350 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,143 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,041 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,973 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,880 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,780 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,847 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,759 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,645 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,561 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,446 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,384 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,542 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,231 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,143 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,004 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,819 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,670 subscribers26 September 2026 — 17,196 subscribers4 October 2026 — 18,300 subscribers9 October 2026 — 17,985 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,632 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,534 subscribers15 October 2026 — 17,473 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,387 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,469 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,325 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,258 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,187 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,071 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,018 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,024 subscribers25 October 2026 — 24,514 subscribers26 October 2026 — 23,610 subscribers27 October 2026 — 23,178 subscribers28 October 2026 — 23,018 subscribers29 October 2026 — 22,834 subscribers30 October 2026 — 22,736 subscribers31 October 2026 — 22,625 subscribers1 November 2026 — 23,195 subscribers2 November 2026 — 23,012 subscribers3 November 2026 — 22,869 subscribers4 November 2026 — 22,760 subscribers5 November 2026 — 22,621 subscribers22,6218 August 20265 November 2026
51 measurements spanning 89 days, net +16,071. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,812–27,214 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 14:1522,621-139
4 Nov 2026, 11:2922,760-109
3 Nov 2026, 09:0922,869-143
2 Nov 2026, 08:3923,012-183
1 Nov 2026, 06:4623,195+570
31 Oct 2026, 04:0122,625-111
30 Oct 2026, 06:0722,736-98
29 Oct 2026, 06:2722,834-184
28 Oct 2026, 06:4623,018-160
27 Oct 2026, 05:2723,178-432
26 Oct 2026, 05:0523,610-904
25 Oct 2026, 04:5124,514+6,490
24 Oct 2026, 05:1718,024+6
23 Oct 2026, 07:4118,018-53
22 Oct 2026, 11:1418,071-116
21 Oct 2026, 02:5618,187-71
19 Oct 2026, 22:4618,258-67
18 Oct 2026, 19:5018,325-144
17 Oct 2026, 18:3018,469+1,082
16 Oct 2026, 15:4817,387first reading

Engagement

84 posts held, back to 25 January 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
99.5%
avg views ÷ 22,621 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,500
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.452%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 84 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held84 (25 January 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total854,960
Reactions total3,863
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 14:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
47
Videos
82
Links
58

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
41m 45s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,223 reactions across 83 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,97027.3%
❤1,44019.9%
🔥1,15516.0%
⚡4816.66%
🏆4576.33%
😡3584.96%
🤩2102.91%
👏1802.49%
😱1772.45%
😨1311.81%
🤔1061.47%
🤯1061.47%
💯951.32%
🫡801.11%
🎉480.665%
👀480.665%
🤨480.665%
🍾410.568%
👎350.485%
😁340.471%
10 further kinds230.318%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 12:45 UTC≈3,770 views14 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Ajoyib jang va super nokaut 🥊@BOKS_BUGUN➥ Eng yaxshi sport yangiliklar kanali

🔥6❤3🤩2🏆1🤔1😱1

5 Nov 2026, 06:18 UTC≈6,890 views42 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🗣Dana Uaytning aytishicha, Islom Maxachev yakunda noma’lum sabablarga ko‘ra jangdan voz kechishidan oldin Karlos Pratesga qarshi jang qilishga og‘zaki rozilik bergan: Ha, og‘zaki kelishuvga erishilgan edi. Men jangchilarning tez-tez oktagonga chiqishini yoqtiraman. Chempion sifatida sendan yiliga uch marta jang qilishni kutmayman, ammo yiliga ikki marta jang qilsang, bu juda yaxshi bo‘lardi». 🥊@BOKS_BUGUN➥ Eng yaxs…

❤25🏆6⚡4👏2👍1💯1🔥1🤔1

2 Nov 2026, 17:34 UTC≈10,600 views98 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Joshua Van Islam Maxachevni tanqidchilardan himoya qildi! Yanvar oyida jang qilishdan bosh tortgani sababli Islam Maxachevga nisbatan tanqidlar kuchayib borayotganiga Joshua Vanning munosabti 💬 «Bu yigit sportda erishishi kerak bo‘lgan barcha narsaga erishdi. Endi yana jang qilishdan nima ma’no bor? Ian Garri ustidan g‘alaba qozonganidan keyin uni GOAT deb atagan muxlislarning bugun unga qarshi chiqayotgani — bu bo…

🔥49❤25👍15⚡4🏆2🤔1🤩1😱1

31 Oct 2026, 21:14 UTC≈17,800 views119 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Mahmud Murodov G-MMA turnirida 6-kishiga qarshi ⚡️ Ushbu turnirda Murodov 6-ta havaskor MMA jangchilarini burma bir qafasda yanchib tashladi 🥊@BOKS_BUGUN➥ Eng yaxshi sport yangiliklar kanali

🏆55❤20👍20🤩10🤔8😱2⚡1🍾1

31 Oct 2026, 21:10 UTC≈17,000 views68 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Mahmud Murodov 6-kishiga qarshi jangda gʻalaba qozondi. ⚡️ Mahmud Murodov 6-kishini birma-bir qafasda yanchib tashladi. 🥊@BOKS_BUGUN➥ Eng yaxshi sport yangiliklar kanali

🔥35❤17⚡4🤩4🏆3👍3🤨2

31 Oct 2026, 20:56 UTC≈21,600 views29 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

▶️ Mahmud Murodov jangi boshlandi. 🟢 Jonli efirga qoʻs hilib olinglar 🔴➡️https://t.me/Boks_Bugun?livestream

😡7❤5🏆5💯3🤩3🍾2👍2😱2

31 Oct 2026, 20:17 UTC≈21,800 views18 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Daxshatli janglar davom etmoqda....⚡️ Jonli efirga qoʻshilib olinglar 🔴➡️https://t.me/Boks_Bugun?livestream

❤9🔥6⚡2👏1

31 Oct 2026, 17:46 UTC≈16,300 views25 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

G-MMA turnirida birinchi nokaut qayd etildi 😳 Jonli efirga qoʻs hilib olinglar 🔴➡️https://t.me/Boks_Bugun?livestream

❤14🤨4🤩4👀1👍1😱1

31 Oct 2026, 17:11 UTC≈17,800 views14 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🔴KOʻK YOZUV USTIGA BOSIB JONLI EFIRGA QO'SHILIB OLING BOSHLANDI. 👆

❤8🤔4🏆2

31 Oct 2026, 16:59 UTC≈25,200 views58 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

▶️G MMA janglari boshlanmoqda jonli efirimizga ulaning, Mahmud Murodov va boshqa qiziqarli janglarni birgalikda tomosha qilamiz! Jonli efirga qoʻs hilib olinglar 🔴➡️https://t.me/Boks_Bugun?livestream

❤18😡13🏆7💯6🤩6🫡4🤨3😱1

31 Oct 2026, 15:56 UTC≈16,600 views101 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

​​🇺🇿 Biz yetib keldik, tez orada jangga chiqamiz! 🕐Jonli efir 22:00 boshlaymiz Jonli efirga qoʻs hilib olinglar 🔴➡️https://t.me/Boks_Bugun?livestream

👍54❤23🏆7🤔5🔥4😱4🤩2🫡2

30 Oct 2026, 13:29 UTC≈16,600 views52 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Afsuski Holmurod Nurmatov hakamlar qaroriga koʻra magʻlub boʻldi Jonli efirga qoʻs hilib olinglar 🔴➡️https://t.me/Boks_Bugun?livestream

😨19❤10👍6💯3🤨3🤩3🤯3🏆2

Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @Boks_Bugun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @Boks_Bugun as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
23 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
29 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Oct 2026, 20:42 UTCAnonymous Poll1,420 voters approx.

Ushbu kamar jangida kim gʻalaba qozonadi deb oʻylaysiz.?🤔

  1. Alex Volkanovski ⚡️55%
  2. Movsar Evloev 👍48%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Oct 2026, 19:49 UTCAnonymous Poll1,670 voters approx.

Kamar jangida kim gʻalaba qozonadi deb oʻylaysiz.🤔

  1. Petr Yan80%
  2. Merab Dvalishvili22%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Oct 2026, 19:18 UTCAnonymous Poll1,750 voters approx.

🤷‍♂

  1. Temirov66%
  2. Kavanabn38%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTCAnonymous Poll969 voters

Kim gʻalaba qozonadi deb oʻylaysiz.?🤔

  1. Erkabulan Toktar57%
  2. Bobur Isroilov50%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTCAnonymous Poll772 voters

Admin ishi jonli efir haqida fikringiz qanday.? 😕

  1. Juda yaxshi46%
  2. Qoʻllab quvvatlaymiz39%
  3. Menga yoqmadi23%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Aug 2026, 03:08 UTCAnonymous Poll2,070 voters approx.

Kim gʻalaba qozonadi deb oʻylaysiz.? 🤔

  1. Islam Maxachev92%
  2. Ian Garry10%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BOKS BUGUN 🥊” (@Boks_Bugun), 22,621 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Boks_Bugun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.