Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BOLINUS 🐌

Channel

BOLINUS 🐌

@Bolinus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,366subscribers

+356 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001861360496
TypeChannel
Username@Bolinus
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bolinus

Growth

15,01015,36615,1886 August 2026 — 15,010 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,026 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,035 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,053 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,075 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,095 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,103 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,106 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,121 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,138 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,161 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,182 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,199 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,215 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,221 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,223 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,234 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,245 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,257 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,264 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,288 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,300 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,311 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,326 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,329 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,338 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,341 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,366 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 30 days, net +356. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,957–15,419 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 01:5815,366+25
3 Sept 2026, 06:0715,341+3
2 Sept 2026, 03:0515,338+9
1 Sept 2026, 04:1615,329+3
31 Aug 2026, 04:3515,326+15
30 Aug 2026, 03:4715,311+11
29 Aug 2026, 00:3715,300+12
28 Aug 2026, 01:3815,288+24
26 Aug 2026, 22:3715,264+7
26 Aug 2026, 01:1215,257+12
25 Aug 2026, 03:5315,245+11
23 Aug 2026, 19:0715,234+11
22 Aug 2026, 02:0415,223+2
20 Aug 2026, 19:1515,221+6
19 Aug 2026, 20:0515,215+16
18 Aug 2026, 18:0315,199+17
17 Aug 2026, 19:5315,182+21
16 Aug 2026, 18:3415,161+23
15 Aug 2026, 07:5615,138+17
14 Aug 2026, 01:4515,121first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 15,366 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,070
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.324%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held43 (24 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total69,252
Reactions total209
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

475 reactions across 38 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
38681.3%
🔥418.63%
😱102.11%
🎄81.68%
😁61.26%
🍓51.05%
👍51.05%
😭51.05%
🎅30.632%
😍30.632%
10.211%
🌚10.211%
👏10.211%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 511 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC922 views1 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🎓هر روز یادگیری صفر تا صد یک مبحث حیاتی برای آمادگی آزمون‌های علوم پایه پزشکی و دندانپزشکی و لیسانس به پزشکی در کانال‌های مدوفست در قالب: 📍مایندمپ‌های خلاصه و کوییزهای آموزشی 📍سوالات منتخب آزمون‌های کشوری همراه با پاسخنامه تشریحی 📍آزمون‌های رایگان شبیه‌ساز جامع برای تمام دروس 📍آزمونک‌ها و تست‌های تألیفی اختصاصی مدوفست ➕لینک کانال علوم پایه مدوفست: http://t.me/medofast_oloompaye ➕لینک کانال لیسانس به پزشکی مدوف

1

Signed Bolinus_adm

28 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC≈1,560 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🤩 فاز ۲ آزمون‌های لیسانس به پزشکی شروع شد! وقتشه دوباره برگردیم سراغ منابع و با کمک برنامه مروری همه درسارو بخونیم و و جدی‌تر برای آزمون لیسانس به پزشکی آماده بشیم. 🔥 در فاز دوم، مسیر آمادگی شما شامل: 📚 شروع مجدد مرور منابع ✏️ ۵ مرحله آزمون مرحله‌ای برای سنجش پیشرفت 🎯 ۲ مرحله آزمون جامع برای شبیه‌سازی فضای واقعی آزمون 📌 از ۲۲ شهریور تا ۱۷ آبان یعنی از همین الان وقتشه موتور مطالعه رو روشن کنیم! 💪 🤩این فاز فقط م

2

28 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈2,400 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

😊ویدئو جدید داریم 🍄آموزش فارماکولوژی 🌷داروهای آنتی کولینرژیک ⭐لینک مشاهده ✈️@bolinus 🇺🇦Youtube 🌐bolinus.com

23🔥3😍3

27 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈2,680 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

سلام بچه هااا👋 امروز یه خلاصه بی‌نظیر از مبحث ازدیاد حساسیت تیپ ۴ (حساسیت دیررس یا تاخیری / DTH) براتون آماده کردیم. بریم تو کارش👇 🧬 مکانیسم اصلی و سلول‌های درگیر: این نوع حساسیت به واسطه سلول‌های T ایجاد می‌شه. سلول‌های مداخله‌گر: سلول‌های Th1 و Th17 (که وظیفه فعال‌سازی ماکروفاژها و ایجاد التهاب رو دارن) و سلول‌های CTL (که عامل اصلی آسیب بافتی هستن). ⚠️ نکته بسیار مهم تستی: این نوع ازدیاد حساسیت کاملاً بدون مداخله

10🍓2🔥2

Signed Cloner

24 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC≈3,690 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026

سلام بچه هااا👋 امروز یه خلاصه بی‌نظیر از مبحث ازدیاد حساسیت تیپ ۲ (بواسطه آنتی‌بادی) براتون آماده کردیم. بریم تو کارش👇 🧬 ویژگی‌های کلی حساسیت تیپ ۲: این نوع حساسیت عمدتاً بوسیله آنتی‌بادی‌های IgG و IgM ایجاد می‌شه. 🩸 درمان کلیدی: در بسیاری از این موارد از پلاسما فرزیس (Plasmapheresis) استفاده می‌شه. ⚠️ نکته: واسکولیت ناشی از ANCA (که در اون آنتی‌بادی علیه نوتروفیل‌ها ساخته می‌شه) هم با مکانیسم‌های مشابهی در ارتباطه.

14🔥4

24 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈4,940 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🤩 فاز ۲ آزمون‌های لیسانس به پزشکی شروع شد! وقتشه دوباره برگردیم سراغ منابع و با کمک برنامه مروری همه درسارو بخونیم و و جدی‌تر برای آزمون لیسانس به پزشکی آماده بشیم. 🔥 در فاز دوم، مسیر آمادگی شما شامل: 📚 شروع مجدد مرور منابع ✏️ ۵ مرحله آزمون مرحله‌ای برای سنجش پیشرفت 🎯 ۲ مرحله آزمون جامع برای شبیه‌سازی فضای واقعی آزمون 📌 از ۲۲ شهریور تا ۱۷ آبان یعنی از همین الان وقتشه موتور مطالعه رو روشن کنیم! 💪 🤩این فاز فقط م

4

24 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC≈3,280 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

تخفیف ۳۰ درصدی خرید از وبسایتمون تمدید شد🔥

8

Signed Bolinus_adm

23 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC≈3,990 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

سلام بچه ها! 🩺✨ امروز بریم سراغ تحلیل یه تست خیلی مهم از فیزیولوژی قلب و مکانیسم معروف «فرانک - استارلینگ». بیاید پاسخنامه رو با هم بررسی کنیم: 🫀👇 📌 تحلیل مکانیسم: عامل اصلی تقویت نیروی انقباضی عضله قلب تو مکانیسم فرانک-استارلینگ در پاسخ به زیاد شدن برگشت خون، «قرارگیری بهینه وضعیت فیلامان‌های اکتین به میوزین» هست. در واقع وقتی خونِ برگشتی به قلب زیاد می‌شه، دیواره بطن کشیده می‌شه. این کشیدگی باعث می‌شه فیلامان‌های

12

Signed Cloner

22 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈3,920 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

کدامیک عامل تقویت نیروی انقباضی عضله قلبی در پاسخ به افزایش بازگشت خون به داخل قلب مکانیسم فرانک-استارلینگ است؟

  1. قرارگیری بهینه وضعیت فیلامانهای اکتین به میوزین49%
  2. افزایش فعالیت آنزیمی سرپلهای عرضی فیلامان میوزین8%
  3. افزایش میزان ذخایر کلسیم داخل سلولی برای انقباض12%
  4. افزایش میزان ورود کلسیم به داخل سلول از غشای پلاسمایی30%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11🍓3🎅3😭1

Signed Cloner

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @Bolinus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz529 voters

کدامیک عامل تقویت نیروی انقباضی عضله قلبی در پاسخ به افزایش بازگشت خون به داخل قلب مکانیسم فرانک-استارلینگ است؟

  1. قرارگیری بهینه وضعیت فیلامانهای اکتین به میوزین49%
  2. افزایش فعالیت آنزیمی سرپلهای عرضی فیلامان میوزین8%
  3. افزایش میزان ذخایر کلسیم داخل سلولی برای انقباض12%
  4. افزایش میزان ورود کلسیم به داخل سلول از غشای پلاسمایی30%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz526 voters

محل استقرار لنفوسیت های T به ترتیب در گره لنفاوی و طحال ...... و ...... میباشند؟

  1. فولیکول - ناحیه حاشیه ای (Marginal zone)17%
  2. پاراکورتکس - غلاف لنفوئیدی دور شریانچه (PALS)46%
  3. فولیکول - غلاف لنفوئیدی دور شریانچه (PALS)21%
  4. PALS - ناحیه حاشیه ای (Marginal zone)16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz766 voters

سمیت کلیوی از عوارض مصرف کدام آنتی‌بیوتیک است؟

  1. وانکومایسین‌37%
  2. سفوکسیتین‌14%
  3. کلیندامایسین‌31%
  4. کلیستین19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz446 voters

در مورد خانمی که در روزهای اول تا دهم سیکل جنسی از داروی مهارکننده رسپتور استروژن (کلومیفن) استفاده نموده است ، کدامیک از گزینه های زیر محتمل است؟

  1. 1️⃣تکمیل زودرس تقسیم میوز تخمک3%
  2. 2️⃣تشدید رشد فولیکولها و احتمال آزاد شدن چندین تخمک28%
  3. 3️⃣مهار رشد فولیکولها و توقف سیکل تخمدانی37%
  4. 4️⃣جلوگیری از اثر فوران LH و ایجاد سیکل جنسی بدون تخمک گذاری33%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz604 voters

تشکیل کدام ساختمان زیر اولین علامت شروع گاسترولاسیون است؟

  1. شیار ابتدائی59%
  2. نوتوکورد20%
  3. آلانتوئیس‌9%
  4. مزودرم خارج رویانی‌12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTCAnonymous Quiz463 voters

هموفیلوس دوکره‌ای، عامل ایجادکننده کدام مورد زیر است؟

  1. شانکر سخت24%
  2. شانکروئید48%
  3. التهاب مجاری ادراری14%
  4. گرانولوم اینگوئینال14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فیلمومِد
@Learningvideos99 · 37,803
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
دانلود کتاب و جزوه | کتابخانه علوم پزشکی
@med_science · 31,452
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
فایل های علوم پزشکیPDF
@MedicalFile · 31,426
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
بانک PDF پزشکی📚
@PDFbankdaro · 32,277
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
خلاصه های بالینی | مدوفست
@medofast_balini · 33,714
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BOLINUS 🐌” (@Bolinus), 15,366 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bolinus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.