Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net -686. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,671–11,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 05:11
10,779
-4
6 Nov 2026, 02:37
10,783
-10
5 Nov 2026, 04:41
10,793
-17
4 Nov 2026, 01:09
10,810
-77
2 Nov 2026, 22:21
10,887
-12
1 Nov 2026, 23:49
10,899
-5
1 Nov 2026, 00:28
10,904
-3
30 Oct 2026, 22:36
10,907
-69
30 Oct 2026, 01:27
10,976
-39
29 Oct 2026, 04:39
11,015
-4
28 Oct 2026, 02:10
11,019
-5
27 Oct 2026, 00:27
11,024
-8
26 Oct 2026, 02:41
11,032
-7
25 Oct 2026, 00:47
11,039
-10
24 Oct 2026, 04:07
11,049
-9
23 Oct 2026, 03:37
11,058
+2
22 Oct 2026, 03:40
11,056
-6
20 Oct 2026, 18:51
11,062
-5
19 Oct 2026, 18:36
11,067
-9
18 Oct 2026, 16:55
11,076
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.03%
avg views ÷ 10,779 subscribers
Avg views / post
866
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.462%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held
20 (2 February 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total
866
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
93
Videos
4
Links
93
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
763 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
348
45.6%
👍
131
17.2%
😍
119
15.6%
🥰
105
13.8%
😢
12
1.57%
🔥
11
1.44%
😭
9
1.18%
👏
5
0.655%
💔
4
0.524%
🤔
4
0.524%
🥴
4
0.524%
❤🔥
3
0.393%
💯
2
0.262%
🗿
2
0.262%
🎃
1
0.131%
🎉
1
0.131%
🤩
1
0.131%
🤯
1
0.131%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 763 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Bookslibraryofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 February 2026 to 24 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👋 Welcome to Onflow Ads
This is our official channel for updates, new features, offers and news from the Onflow Ads team.
🚀 What is Onflow Ads?
A Telegram advertising platform built to do ads differently:
💰 Paid Promotions: book ads in channels, or sell the ad slots in yours. Payment is held safely until the ad has run.
🤝 Free growth: swap posts with other channels, or grow through the Subscriber Exchange.
🤖 Hands…
The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How delightful! The Romantasy Vault has finally graced our shelves, and we are absolutely thrilled to share this wonderful news with you.
Click here to join the library 😮
Imagine the joy of exploring 500 exclusive volumes dedicated to the enchanting world of Romantasy! It would be a true pleasure to see you share these literary treasures with the friends and family you hold dear.
Please accept our heartfelt apolog…
The reactions fall like dry leaves, far fewer than the harvest we anticipated. (To expect much is to invite sorrow, or so the Master whispered while sweeping.) At this pace, the drop shall be delayed for all of us 😔.
⚔️ MASSIVE ROMANTASY VAULT DROP INCOMING! 👑🔥
✨ 500+ Pure Romantasy E-Books Are Waiting to Be Unlocked!
No filler, no other genres—just 500 pure, spellbinding Romantic Fantasy books ready to completely ruin your sleep schedule! Get ready for:
🗡 Morally grey heroes & shadow-wielding lords
🐉 Dangerous Fae, dragons, and lethal magical realms
🔥 Enemies-to-lovers, forced proximity, and top-tier spice
👑 Court intrigue, hi…
📖 Title : The Open Conspiracy
✍️ Author : H.G. Wells
⭐️ Rating : 3.44/5 (Goodreads)
📆 Published : Jan 01, 1928
————————————————
Summary: What if a single, global government could eradicate war and nationalistic strife? In The Open Conspiracy, legendary author H.G. Wells steps away from science fiction to present a provocative blueprint for a real "world revolution." He argues passionately against sovereign nation-s…
📖 Title : The Annotated Mansfield Park
✍️ Author : Jane Austen
⭐️ Rating : 3.86/5 (Goodreads)
📆 Published : Jul 02, 1814
————————————————
Summary: Mansfield Park by Jane Austen is a captivating classic of social rivalry and hidden desire. Sent from poverty to live at her wealthy uncle’s grand estate, timid Fanny Price grows up overlooked by her privileged relatives. When the glamorous, scheming Crawford siblings ar…
Since we've been away for a while, there are a number of pending tasks we need to take care of before getting back to business as usual.
First, we'll be updating and improving our existing infrastructure—bots, files, and all the other systems that help keep this place running smoothly.
Once that's done, we'll resume book uploads as well. By then, we expect our stats and overall performance to be in a much better pl…
Hello bookworms,
It has been a long time since we all interacted.
We admins have been busy with our personal lives over the past few weeks, but a few of us are ready to continue from where we left off.
To begin, let us know which books you want to read, and we will upload them here.
📖 Title : The Frozen River
✍️ Author : Ariel Lawhon
⭐️ Rating : 4.38/5 (Goodreads)
📆 Published : Dec 05, 2023
————————————————
Summary: The Frozen River by Ariel Lawhon is a historical mystery set in 1789 Maine. Midwife and healer Martha Ballard is called to examine the body of a man found trapped in the frozen Kennebec River. While authorities quickly declare the death an accident, Martha suspects something far da…
❤16👍9🥰6😍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Bookslibraryofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @Bookslibraryofficial as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
34 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Vote for the book that should come up next.
P.S. All the books will be uploaded in order of the number of votes they receive.
Was I Ever Enough? by Yash Ranjit Jain26%
The Intruder by Freida McFadden20%
The Frozen River by Ariel Lawhon9%
I Cannot Say Goodbye to You by Rithvik Singh25%
Dyingful by Akhira4%
Making It Big: Lessons from a Life in Business by Femi Otedola7%
The Somnath Cipher by Priyanka Pathak Narain8%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 24 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Books Hub: Free Ebook & Audiobook @bookshub25 · 274,872 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
Audio Books Archive @AudiobooksArchive · 130,833 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 August 2026
@BooksThief @BooksThief · 51,527 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 August 2026
eBook Room @eBookRoom · 336,680 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
Books | Selfhelp | Nonfiction @books_rec · 62,559 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
Books @books · 217,752 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
❤️ Ayurveda Library ❤️ @ayurveda_vvk · 45,911 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Velvet Pages | eLibrary 🥂” (@Bookslibraryofficial), 10,779 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bookslibraryofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.