Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [𝖡𝗈𝗈𝗆!]𝖠𝗆𝗒

Channel

[𝖡𝗈𝗈𝗆!]𝖠𝗆𝗒

@BoomAmyRose_BSn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004299991625
TypeChannel
Username@BoomAmyRose_BSn
Created14 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 October 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BoomAmyRose_BSn

Growth

116 Oct 2026, 09:47 — 11 subscribers6 Oct 2026, 10:22 — 11 subscribers6 Oct 2026, 09:476 Oct 2026, 10:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 10:2211no change
6 Oct 2026, 09:4711first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
363.6%
avg views ÷ 11 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held14 (14 August 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total40
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Oct 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1655.2%
💘931.0%
❤‍🔥413.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 04:02 UTC40 views2 reactionsread 6 October 2026

🔞🔞🌟🔞 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹🥹🥹🤩так! Всем доброго, добрейшего утречка. Я рада, что вы всё ещё со мной и наблюдаете за моим блогом. Сегодня я встала довольно таки рано, даже, видимо, раньше всех! И что вы думаете я сделала? Конечно же приготовила себе вкуснейший завтрак. Хм... Может, сегодня сделать Чили доги кстати? Что думаете?🥹

❤2

25 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC46 views2 reactionsread 6 October 2026

🔞🔞🔞🌟🌟🔞🔞🔞🔞 🥹🥹🥹🤩т... ГОСПОДИ, ЭГГМАН, НЕТ! Нет! Я не это имела ввиду! Обойдёмся без твоих нападений, я серьёзно. У меня по планам целый список, и я явно не позволю тебе их нарушить, так что продолжай и дальше там... Копаться в своих холодильниках. Всё. Сотни?! Ты с ума сошёл?!🥹

❤1❤‍🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC47 views3 reactionsread 6 October 2026

🔞🔞🌟🔞 🥹🥹🥹🤩 признаюсь, что немного увлеклась и забыла про блог. Но! Я вспомнила и ни в коем случае не покинула вас! День пообещал быть более спокойным, и так и есть. Но поверите, но пока что всё спокойно и происшествий нет, И Я ОЧЕНЬ НАДЕЮСЬ ЧТО ДАЛЬШЕ ТАК И БУДЕТ. На этом всё, мне больше нечего к сожалению рассказать...🥹

❤3

20 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC51 views2 reactionsread 6 October 2026

🔞🔞🌟🌟🔞🔞🔞🔞🔞 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 « Как ты относишься к Эггману? » 🥹🥹🥹🤩ак я отношусь к Эггману? Ну а как бы вы относились к своему врагу, который каждый день не даёт НОРМАЛЬНО ОТДОХНУТЬ. Не говоря уже про его смену манер. Нет, серьёзно, он иногда ведёт себя ужасно... Но должна признать, что иногда он очень хороший собеседник и, кхм. Соперник, да. Я хотела сказать соперник. Мы и вправду иногда можем общаться и проводить в…

❤2

18 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC41 views7 reactionsread 6 October 2026

🌟🔞🔞🔞🔞🔞🔞🔞 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹🥹🥹🤩, я так рада новеньки- ЭГГМАН? КЬЮБОТ? А-а вы что тут забыли? Господи... Я думала хоть здесь от тебя найдётся покой... Ну, чтож, очень "рада" вас видеть. Но должна признать, мне интересно, что же ты будешь рассказывать в своём блоге. Так что, пожалуй подпишусь- НО ЭТО ни в коем случае не значит, что я тебе доверяю. Не-а , даже не думай. Ясно? Ну... Да. Ой, в общем, всё.🥹

❤‍🔥3❤2💘2

16 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC43 views3 reactionsread 6 October 2026

🔞🔞🌟🔞 🔞🔞🌟 🔞🔞🔞🔞 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹🥹🥹🤩ечерка... День выдался тяжёлым , но я должна признать, что он также был хорошим и без массовых происшествий, КОНЕЧНО ЖЕ за исключением того, что как всегда ЭГГМАН, можно сказать ежедневно нападает на бедную деревушку, но если исключить факт того, сколько нам придётся потеть и работать после всего этого, то это норма. Ладно, нет! Не норма! Это бесит, но не будем о…

💘2❤1

15 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC42 views7 reactionsread 6 October 2026

🔞🔞🌟🔞 🔞🔞🌟 🔞🔞🔞🔞 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹🥹🥹🤩сем доброго утра и хорошего времяпровождения с близкими! Так как сегодня довольно хороший и очень солнечный день, мы с Соником, Наклзом, Тейлзом и Стикс решили наконец-то искупаться. Всё бы хорошо, да вот есть одно но. Соник. Серьёзно , как маленький! Боится воды так, будто это огонь. Я всё конечно понимаю но... Аргх, в прошлый раз когда мы пытались помочь ему по…

💘5❤2

14 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

————————————————————————————— ➿➿➿➿ 🥹 𝖤𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌 🥹 ➿➿➿➿

❤2

14 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𝖠𝗆𝗒's Blog! ——————— 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗒 ・ 𝗋𝗎𝗅𝖾𝗌 ・ 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗆𝖾! ・ 𝗉𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗌𝖾?

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @BoomAmyRose_BSn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[𝖡𝗈𝗈𝗆!]𝖠𝗆𝗒” (@BoomAmyRose_BSn), 11 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BoomAmyRose_BSn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.