Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
20 measurements spanning 71 days, net -89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,048–3,167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Oct 2026, 17:49
3,062
-5
14 Oct 2026, 18:37
3,067
-4
11 Oct 2026, 01:39
3,071
-7
4 Oct 2026, 21:57
3,078
-11
25 Sept 2026, 21:38
3,089
-13
17 Sept 2026, 12:21
3,102
-8
13 Sept 2026, 10:19
3,110
-7
9 Sept 2026, 16:37
3,117
-9
4 Sept 2026, 08:39
3,126
-6
1 Sept 2026, 04:56
3,132
-5
29 Aug 2026, 12:36
3,137
-3
26 Aug 2026, 15:58
3,140
+13
23 Aug 2026, 17:33
3,127
-12
20 Aug 2026, 10:44
3,139
-4
17 Aug 2026, 12:02
3,143
-5
14 Aug 2026, 07:05
3,148
-5
11 Aug 2026, 04:01
3,153
+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:34
3,152
+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:16
3,151
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:04
3,151
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
499 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
192
38.5%
🤡
77
15.4%
😁
71
14.2%
custom 5271986606817942745
68
13.6%
💅
61
12.2%
💊
13
2.61%
👎
10
2.00%
🤔
4
0.802%
😱
3
0.601%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 499 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Че, может ещё и на премьеру Колобка сходить? Мне понравилось спустя много лет, как я не был в кино, поход на Одиссею
Я тогда обожрался попкорна из ведра, у меня прям приступ ностальгии случился
А тут ещё и пустой зал будет, можно ботинки снять и с вонючими ногами разложиться на целом ряду. Если бы зал был полон, то как с человеком пауком получилось бы, когда чел на премьере в костюме халка запердел всё вокруг, весь…
Вон он че вытворяет по одному промпту, я уже слышу что вайбкодинг это уже считается обычным кодингом
Мне еще очень интересно как на моей прошлой работе это сделано. Ввели ли они кодинг нейронками или все также ручками копаются в говнокоде
Хотя я хз, откуда могут быть нейронки, учитывая санкции и то что это около гос предприятие
Там кста вроде в курсоре появилась подписка на claude opus 5, че может обновить подписку и возобновить стримы по свинокоду?
Будем делать онлайн игры, с чатом играть (2 часа я буду сидеть и тупить, не понимая почему эта хуйня не работает)
Ебать смешная хуйня
Какой то электрик спросил у режиссера колобка под постом в его тгк, почему в фильме такая хуевая графика. В ответ на это режиссер Антон Маслов нашел блог этого электрика, где он выкладывает свою работу и стал критиковать уже ее, типо, КАКАЯ ЖЕ ХУЕВАЯ ПРОВОДКА
Хоть где то у нас в стране есть культура дискуссии
Вчера сходил на Одиссею, могу сказать что это годнота
Я никогда не любил фильмы Нолана, это какая то всегда была блокбастерная нудятина под соусом "авторского кино" (которое мне обычно нравится, но Нолана я не понимал). Но тут я кажется понял Нолана с его адаптацией мифа через ПТСР Одиссея и пацифестические выводы
И как же похуй на черную Елену и не реалистичного троянского коня. В фильме так и так дохуя несоответс…
Кстати чувствую себя намного лучше, второй день нет высокой температуры (сижу на антибиотиках)
❤27💅3🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Boron20000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BORON2000” (@Boron20000), 3,062 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Boron20000.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.