⭐️ Looks like these bots have few ratings! Try them and share your opinion, vote!

Channel
BotsArchive
@BotsArchive
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
110,195subscribers
-105 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001348965734 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BotsArchive |
| Description | 🗄 Bot: @BotsArchiveBot 🌐 Website: https://botsarchive.com 📎 Group chat: @BotsArchiveChat 🌵 Since 01/01/2019 If you believe that a bot is violating your intellectual property, please email us at [email protected] to get it removed from BotsArchive |
| Created | 1 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BotsArchive |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 110,195 | +20 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 110,175 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:23 | 110,190 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:27 | 110,187 | -34 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 110,221 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 110,234 | +6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 110,228 | -18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 110,246 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 110,259 | -35 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 110,294 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 110,284 | -57 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 110,341 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 110,358 | +33 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 110,325 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 110,335 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 110,336 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 110,348 | -62 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 110,410 | +41 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 110,369 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 110,374 | first reading |
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.22%
- avg views ÷ 110,195 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,750
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 24
- of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (20 July 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 120,840 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 16:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 805
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
🤖 New bot 📋 Name: balance_it_bot 🆔 Username: @balance_it_bot ⭐️ Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (4.1/5 on 89 votes) ➖➖➖ ℹ️Description: Effortless portfolio tracking and rebalancing across stocks, ETFs, crypto, and cash — globally. Get alerts when allocations drift, segment your portfolio any way you like, and rebalance with a single tap. 🌐 Languages: English 💬 Supports inline: no 👥 Groups: no #️⃣ Tags: #assets #allocation #finances…
BotsArchive pinned «🗂Welcome to @BotsArchive, the most powerful archive in the telegram bots history. Here we will post new useful bots almost everyday, feel free to use our bot @BotsArchiveBot to suggest new ones or search them in our database. 🌐 Website: http://www.botsarchive.com…»
🗂Welcome to @BotsArchive, the most powerful archive in the telegram bots history. Here we will post new useful bots almost everyday, feel free to use our bot @BotsArchiveBot to suggest new ones or search them in our database. 🌐 Website: http://www.botsarchive.com ⚙ APIs: http://www.botsarchive.com/docs.html 👤Get in touch with us: @BotsArchiveSupportbot 🏆 BEST NEW BOTS OF THE WEEK 🏆 🥇 hayvonot_trading_bot - ⭐️⭐️⭐️…
⭐️ Looks like these bots have few ratings! Try them and share your opinion, vote!
🤖 New bot 📋 Name: ManagioBot 🆔 Username: @ManagioBot ⭐️ Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (3.6/5 on 58 votes) ➖➖➖ ℹ️Description: Managio is an independent Telegram bot focused on group management, moderation, and security. It provides essential features for free, does not contain 18+ content, does not require joining any community, and was not created using bot-building services such as Manybot. 🌐 Languages: English Turkish 💬 Supports …
🤖 New bot 📋 Name: hayvonot_trading_bot 🆔 Username: @hayvonot_trading_bot ⭐️ Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (4.1/5 on 51 votes) ➖➖➖ ℹ️Description: Alerts on volume spikes across 20 crypto pairs, around the clock. Each alert carries the measured win rate and average result of its signal source, negative ones included, plus entry and exit times. 3 alerts per day are free. Not investment advice. 🌐 Languages: English Russian Uzbek Span…
🤖 New bot 📋 Name: AartiMusic_bot 🆔 Username: @AartiMusic_bot ⭐️ Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (4.1/5 on 53 votes) ➖➖➖ ℹ️Description: AartiMusic is a Telegram music bot that lets users search and get songs instantly. It can be used through inline search in any chat, group, or channel, even when the bot has not been added there. Fast, simple, and free to use. 🌐 Languages: English Hindi 💬 Supports inline: yes 👥 Groups: yes #️⃣ Tags:…
BotsArchive pinned «🗂Welcome to @BotsArchive, the most powerful archive in the telegram bots history. Here we will post new useful bots almost everyday, feel free to use our bot @BotsArchiveBot to suggest new ones or search them in our database. 🌐 Website: http://www.botsarchive.com…»
🗂Welcome to @BotsArchive, the most powerful archive in the telegram bots history. Here we will post new useful bots almost everyday, feel free to use our bot @BotsArchiveBot to suggest new ones or search them in our database. 🌐 Website: http://www.botsarchive.com ⚙ APIs: http://www.botsarchive.com/docs.html 👤Get in touch with us: @BotsArchiveSupportbot 🏆 BEST NEW BOTS OF THE WEEK 🏆 🥇 trackxpress_bot - ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (3…
🤖 New bot 📋 Name: MnesiklesBot 🆔 Username: @MnesiklesBot ⭐️ Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (3.6/5 on 49 votes) ➖➖➖ ℹ️Description: Stores birthdays, anniversaries and custom dates, and reminds you about them at your chosen time and time zone. Add entries by text, by voice or in bulk via .xlsx, share them with other users, and generate greetings with AI. Includes referral program, Telegram Stars subscription and 6 languages 🌐 Language…
⭐️ Looks like these bots have few ratings! Try them and share your opinion, vote!
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @BotsArchive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@BotsArchive edited 21 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 7 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@MowjBots · 18,4695 postsSilverOS 🇬🇧
@SilverOSpEN · 1025 postsΔᏟiĐ Projects
@AcidProjects · 2,3214 posts📢 | Ɲєωѕ • Aραтιcx Dɛʋ
@ApaticxDevNews · 843 posts𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗕𝗼𝘁𝘀 || 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗲
@BotsDataBase · 1503 postsBots.DC
@dcbots · 1473 posts🇮🇱 רובוטים ישראלים 🇮🇱
@JewishBots · 6,5983 postsMassive Box Updates
@MassiveBoxUpdates · 712 postsMat's Bot
@MatBots · 362 postsAliSadeghiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
@alisadeghiofficialpage · 11 postArchivio Canali
@ArchivioCanali · 1831 postDiario Scuola | News
@DiarioScuola · 211 post🍷کانال ویس به سلامتی🍷
@eshgheghadim1 · 111 postانتقال یافت | transferred
@FiIeMakerBot · 781 postGet Chat ID - Updates
@GetChatID_Updates · 1,1351 postGroup Butler Español
@GroupButlerEs · 4331 postTecnoLab360™
@tecnolab360 · 2001 post索引频道
@teleindex · 4,3731 postרובוטים מבית הישראלים
@theisraelisBots · 7871 post🔮 echo ‘Magic’
@Wizard_Loop · 471 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BotsArchive” (@BotsArchive), 110,195 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BotsArchive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.