Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BroFi GOLD

Channel

BroFi GOLD

@BroFiGOLD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,017subscribers

-277 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001124127873
TypeChannel
Username@BroFiGOLD
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BroFiGOLD

Growth

12,01712,29412,155.56 August 2026 — 12,294 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,294 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,287 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,275 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,269 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,258 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,247 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,239 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,231 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,220 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,217 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,201 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,187 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,178 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,169 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,160 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,149 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,138 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,128 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,121 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,116 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,113 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,099 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,091 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,080 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,072 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,063 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,051 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,042 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,017 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 34 days, net -277. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,975–12,336 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 18:5712,017-25
5 Sept 2026, 10:1612,042-9
3 Sept 2026, 11:3612,051-12
2 Sept 2026, 06:0412,063-9
1 Sept 2026, 05:5812,072-8
31 Aug 2026, 05:2612,080-11
30 Aug 2026, 06:0712,091-8
29 Aug 2026, 03:5412,099-14
28 Aug 2026, 00:5312,113-3
26 Aug 2026, 22:0312,116-5
26 Aug 2026, 01:2312,121-7
25 Aug 2026, 03:1312,128-10
23 Aug 2026, 22:1412,138-11
22 Aug 2026, 07:0712,149-11
20 Aug 2026, 19:1312,160-9
19 Aug 2026, 16:5512,169-9
18 Aug 2026, 16:4712,178-9
17 Aug 2026, 18:3812,187-14
16 Aug 2026, 14:1512,201-16
14 Aug 2026, 20:2712,217first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 11 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.89%
avg views ÷ 12,017 subscribers
Avg views / post
949
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held21 (11 January 202625 August 2026)
Views total1,897
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 00s
Average length
5m 30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

318 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12940.6%
👍10834.0%
🔥4815.1%
😁226.92%
🏆82.52%
🐳30.943%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 318 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC677 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

First you hear it from your boy Sami in BroFi Then you hear it from the world. Bitcoin never even entered a bear market.

8👍4🔥1😁1

19 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC≈1,220 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Huge break for Bitcoin, doing what Bitcoin does. We’ve now smashed through BOTH key resistance levels I outlined (65k and 67k). If bitcoin can hold onto this by: 1) staying above these levels for a few days 2) getting far beyond this level (like into the mid 70k region) … then we have a real shot at seeing this through. If this turns out to be a deviation where BTC returns back below 65k with confidence, we will

👍11🔥2

11 Jul 2026, 03:14 UTC≈1,690 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

BTC/USD At risk of reading into intra-day price action too closely.. this is certainly looking like an increase in strength from Bitcoin so far. BTC is holding up at resistance which is always a good sign indicating positive volatility to come. Earlier, BTC saw much faster and clearer rejections. Bears are not defending this level with as much vigor. If posture holds and grows stronger across the stock market, I

👍17

10 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,370 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

BTC/USD If she can keep showing strength here, we may be good for some time here. No doubt, short traders will be beginning to enter here given how bearish the trend has been. I don't see anything special in either direction here other than BTC clearly looking a little stronger at this $64,000 level than previously. Not enough to be a huge difference, but the subtle gain in strength is there. If we can clear $64,

👍75😁2

4 Jul 2026, 05:35 UTC≈1,540 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

What’s the worst case? $40,000? $45,000? Ultimately, we’ve seen all of this before. These events USED to be scary. Now, we have price history. P.S. new content format in this video. Few issues still to iron out but it’s looking good! Check it out and let me know what you think: @happycarbonatom

8👍8😁1

16 Jun 2026, 05:49 UTC≈1,990 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

That was quick to materialise lol I’d already move my SL to b/e just based off this. Doesn’t matter where she goes from here.

3👍3

16 Jun 2026, 03:58 UTC≈1,580 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Some after hours SpaceX analysis for those of you trading this crazy PA. Lots of healthy speculation and volatility and you can already trade it on Bybit or Blofin (https://partner.blofin.com/d/Forflies⁣) Will continue putting out analysis on SPCX especially as I see healthy opportunities in the market.

4

28 May 2026, 05:07 UTC≈2,120 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

We still haven't even hit support yet. The masses are panicking as the market closes distance between obvious levels.. as usual. Watching to see a bounce off the low 70s now that we're getting there. If we see strength off the low 70s, high 60s, that makes their scared behaviour a very good thing for us. it would prove, at least initially, that the market is still setting higher highs and higher lows while the who

14🔥6🏆2👍2

25 May 2026, 03:08 UTC≈1,820 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

S&P 500 futures are at fresh all time highs like nothing has been going on. That is probably the clearest evidence of where we are right now. The economy doesn’t make sense. The markets don’t make sense. Nothing makes sense anymore. But phases like this don’t end just because people think they should. They can last a lot longer than the market is prepared for. The more the market keeps disproving the bears, the

🔥13🐳2

14 May 2026, 08:13 UTC≈1,950 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026

BTC slipping below 80k does not bother me as much as people probably think. It's holding on pretty well so far but even if it doesn't, I’m not treating 80k as the line where everything is suddenly broken. If this market wants to flush lower, even towards 70k, I can tolerate that as long as the structure still looks like a reset rather than a real breakdown. The important thing is whether buyers keep showing up on w

👍8🔥2😁1

13 May 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,750 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥10👍2

7 May 2026, 06:56 UTC≈2,230 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

stock market is a fuckin meme fam

😁11👍9

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @BroFiGOLD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BroFi GOLD” (@BroFiGOLD), 12,017 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BroFiGOLD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.