Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @EliteSignal_Vip. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Views per post sit far below this size band
260 average views per post against 1,000,915 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.026%. Across the 392 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000,915–12,924,609 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.16% and 7.25%, with a median of 2.99%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
320 of 320 published in the window (320 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
83,306
Mature posts only
0.033% over 170 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
59 measurements spanning 89 days, net -111,210. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 984,234–1,128,807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 22:21
1,000,915
-1,064
3 Nov 2026, 19:40
1,001,979
-1,067
2 Nov 2026, 19:21
1,003,046
-866
1 Nov 2026, 21:54
1,003,912
-877
1 Nov 2026, 00:06
1,004,789
-1,135
31 Oct 2026, 01:37
1,005,924
-989
30 Oct 2026, 01:28
1,006,913
-907
29 Oct 2026, 03:06
1,007,820
-1,056
27 Oct 2026, 22:19
1,008,876
-1,320
26 Oct 2026, 21:06
1,010,196
-850
25 Oct 2026, 21:51
1,011,046
-823
24 Oct 2026, 20:21
1,011,869
-938
23 Oct 2026, 22:36
1,012,807
-1,127
22 Oct 2026, 20:44
1,013,934
-1,032
21 Oct 2026, 19:40
1,014,966
-1,103
20 Oct 2026, 17:47
1,016,069
-1,088
19 Oct 2026, 20:17
1,017,157
-1,073
18 Oct 2026, 23:44
1,018,230
-1,223
17 Oct 2026, 23:29
1,019,453
-892
17 Oct 2026, 02:54
1,020,345
first reading
Engagement
2,470 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.026%
avg views ÷ 1,000,915 subscribers
Avg views / post
262
312 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.358%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
312
of 2,470 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 72 of 312 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
2,470 (30 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
81,857
Reactions total
74
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 13:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,400
Videos
≈35
Links
≈1,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 19s
Average length
2m 19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 1,467 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (921 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 1,442 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3.5 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 40.9% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 77.6% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 156 views — 0.015% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 240).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 26 interp.still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
62 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
149 reactions across 111 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
127
85.2%
👍
13
8.72%
🔥
5
3.36%
🎉
3
2.01%
🥰
1
0.671%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 139 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 312 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🙄🔥 منتظریم ببینیم کانال روسی قراره درباره ارز بعدی چی اعلام کنه!
گفتن خبرهای خفنی در راهه و ظاهراً قراره اتفاقات جالبی بیفته…
فعلاً چشمانتظاریم؛ ببینیم این بار چه سورپرایزی برامون دارن! 🚀💎
❤️ همیشه توی زندگیتون سعی کنید دست آدمها رو بگیرید و به بقیه کمک کنید؛ حتی اگه کمترین چیزی باشه که از دستتون برمیاد.
من به یه چیز ایمان دارم؛ وقتی امروز به کسی کمک میکنی، شاید فردا که خودت توی سختی افتادی، یه نفر دیگه از راه برسه و دستت رو بگیره. اینطوری زنجیرهای از مهربونی شکل میگیره که میتونه زندگی آدمهای زیادی رو تغییر بده. 🖤
پول بدون شک یکی از مهمترین چیزهای دنیاست؛ اما هیچ مبلغی نمیتونه جای لبخندی که …
رفقای خفن، من همینجا از پروژه خارج میشم و میفروشم! 😍💥
اول از همه نوش جون تکتکتون 🖤 امیدوارم همگی سودهای فوقالعادهای گرفته باشید و این موفقیت براتون پر از خیر و برکت باشه.
اما یه تصمیم مهم گرفتم؛ میخوام ۲۰ هزار دلار از سودی که به دست آوردم رو صرف کارهای خیریه کنم. 🖤
این موضوع رو اینجا باهاتون به اشتراک گذاشتم، چون معتقدم خوبی وقتی چند برابر میشه که با هم تقسیمش کنیم.
شما هم اگر سود خوبی به دست آوردید، بخشی…
حتی هوش مصنوعی هم شوک شده 😍💥
قدرت خانواده ما اینه تویه ۲۴ ساعت یه ارز معرفی کردیم که شده ۱۷۴ برابر 🔥⚠️
⚠️ اگه شما فقط ۱۰۰ دلار موقع که معرفی شد میخریدی الان شده بود ۱۷ هزار دلار
یا ۱ هزار دلار میخریدی الان شده بود ۲۰۰ هزار دلار
واقعاً حجم پیامها ترکونده! 😍🔥 انقدر پیام خفن ازتون رسیده که امکان انتشار همشون نیست؛ فقط ۳ تاشو انتخاب کردم تا ببینید چه خانواده فوقالعادهای کنار هم داریم! ❤️🔥💥
هنوزم فرصت خرید هست میتونید خرید بزنید ‼️
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,470 posts we hold for @BtcLob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 September 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“علیرضا کالجی | تحلیل سیگنال| تحلیل کریپتو |” (@BtcLob), 1,000,915 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BtcLob.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
