Channel
@Btc_cryptoworlds
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,109subscribers
-114 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001430638220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Btc_cryptoworlds |
| Created | 29 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Btc_cryptoworlds |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 5,109 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 5,119 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 5,128 | -11 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 5,139 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:46 | 5,148 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 5,154 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 5,163 | -9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 5,172 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 5,188 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 5,196 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 5,204 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 5,214 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 5,223 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 5,223 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Cryptocurrency trading volumes have fallen to their lowest level since the start of the year Average daily trading volume on the largest crypto exchanges has fallen to $20 billion—70% below January’s peak and 50% less than in December 2025—with just six of the largest exchanges now accounting for about 60% of all trading activity. Join 👉🏼 Telegy | Crypto
💵 $15,000 with $150 in mouth of trading! 💱 Over the course of a four-week trading marathon, she grew her capital from $150 to $15,000 What’s her secret? “Lisa trades every day using her own unique method.” She posts trading signals for free on her channel. New challenge ⏺Start: $70 ⏺Goal: $7,000 ⏺Duration: approximately two weeks. ➡️ Join now and get started—there won’t be a second chance ↘️ https://t.me/+_9NtZj…
A crypto trader turned $200,000 into $27.5 million by trading with extremely high leverage. But he was unable to hold onto his profits: in just one month, he lost almost everything he had earned. Join to Crypto World
Tether Has Two Years Left to Bring USDT Into Compliance If Tether fails to bring USDT into compliance with the requirements of the GENIUS Act, U.S. exchanges and crypto services will no longer be able to support this stablecoin starting in July 2028. Join 👉🏼 Telegy | Crypto
🇯🇵 Japan is preparing to launch its first Bitcoin ETF The country’s largest financial firms are already developing spot funds, and the market size in the first year following a potential launch by 2028 is estimated at $18 billion. Join to Crypto World
Stablecoins Are Becoming the New Financial Infrastructure According to Binance Research, products linked to traditional assets have already surpassed $1.1 trillion in trading volume in 2026, and stablecoins themselves are being used more and more for transfers, payments, and income-generating services. Join to Crypto World
A New Parabolic Rise in BTC Will Require More Than $1 Trillion The head of CryptoQuant believes that, due to declining capital efficiency, Bitcoin’s next major bull cycle will require a massive influx of institutional investment. Join to Crypto World
GTA 6 turned out to be the cheapest game in the series when adjusted for inflation. If we convert the prices of the games to 2026 dollars, we get: — GTA 3 (2001) – $50 would be worth $94; — GTA Vice City (2002) – $50 would be worth $92; — GTA San Andreas (2004) – $50 would be worth $88; — GTA 4 (2008) – $60 would be worth $94; — GTA 5 (2013) – $60 would be worth $86; — GTA 6 (2026) – $80. If we compare prices using …
❤1🔥1
⚠️ DeFi Has Been Losing Liquidity Throughout 2026 The sector’s TVL has already fallen by nearly 39% since the start of the year—from $115 billion to $70 billion—and among the major ecosystems, only TRON and Hyperliquid are still in the black. Join to Crypto World
The gap between Musk and Nakamoto is truly enormous According to current estimates, Musk’s net worth remains roughly 16 times greater than the value of Satoshi’s estimated BTC reserves (about 1.1 million BTC). Join to Crypto World
🏴 The Bank of England has adopted a lenient approach to stablecoins Instead of restricting users, the regulator decided to oversee the issuers themselves—by imposing a cap on the total supply of each stablecoin, starting at £40 billion. Join 👉🏼 Telegy | Crypto
Tether Shuts Down Another Experiment Tether has announced the closure of the Alloy by Tether platform and the aUSDT token, which was backed by the gold-backed stablecoin Tether Gold. Join to Crypto World
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Btc_cryptoworlds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto World” (@Btc_cryptoworlds), 5,109 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Btc_cryptoworlds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.