Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 3side кибербезопасности

Channel

3side кибербезопасности

@By3side

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

10,222subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744917519
TypeChannel
Username@By3side
Created4 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/By3side

Growth

10,21510,26810,241.56 August 2026 — 10,265 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,265 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,268 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,263 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,262 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,260 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,253 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,252 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,242 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,237 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,233 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,226 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,222 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,223 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,220 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,225 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,220 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,222 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,225 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,223 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,222 subscribers10,2226 August 202629 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 24 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,207–10,276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 18:0510,222-1
28 Aug 2026, 17:1710,223-2
27 Aug 2026, 13:5410,225+3
26 Aug 2026, 12:3410,222+7
25 Aug 2026, 12:2410,215-5
24 Aug 2026, 11:1710,220-5
22 Aug 2026, 15:3310,225+5
21 Aug 2026, 06:2810,220-3
20 Aug 2026, 08:5510,223+1
19 Aug 2026, 05:3310,222-4
18 Aug 2026, 08:3310,226-7
17 Aug 2026, 09:4710,233-4
15 Aug 2026, 18:2610,237-5
14 Aug 2026, 03:4510,242-10
12 Aug 2026, 23:2810,252-1
12 Aug 2026, 02:5710,253-7
11 Aug 2026, 04:0510,260-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:0010,262-1
9 Aug 2026, 10:3110,263-5
7 Aug 2026, 07:0110,268first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 10,222 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,750
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held28 (8 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total19,270
Reactions total257
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

798 reactions across 28 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥30237.8%
👍25031.3%
11013.8%
👏475.89%
🤔394.89%
😁202.51%
🤯192.38%
🤡50.627%
👨‍💻40.501%
👎10.125%
🗿10.125%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 798reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 28 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @By3side. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈1,230 views45 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Мутный конкурент Рынок кибербеза очень маленький, поэтому появление кого-то абсолютно нового в конкурсах всегда вызывает интерес. И вот один из наших партнеров приносит нам на удивление недорогое(!) КП от компании-конкурента, о которой мы ничего не слышали. Причем если зайти на сайт компании, то в партнерах там все гранды кибербезопасности с их решениями. - Кто же вы, господа? - Кто в вашей команде технарей? - По

🤔29🔥8🤯4👍3👨‍💻1

24 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈1,320 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Внешнее управление для КИИ? Пока это хайп, но закон все равно странный Тут в крупных новостных ТГ-пабликах прошла масса новостей о том, что теперь за невыполнение требований к критической информационной инфраструктуре в России будут вводить внешнее управление. Звучит страшно (многие ИБшники знатно офигели), но реальность немножко другая — речь идет о невыполнении требование по защите от БПЛА объектов критической (не

🤯15🤔7👨‍💻2

24 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC≈1,290 views38 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Мы запускаем NoHack — программу обучения личной кибербезопасности 3side вместе с партнером-образовательной организацией запускает программу обучения личной кибербезопасности. Тут идея в чем — мы учим базовым вещам современной безопасности. Как работают мошенники, какие данные утекают, как работают хакеры, как от них защищаться и многому другому. В общем, безопасность в цифровом мире. NoHack существует в двух формат

18🔥13👍7

18 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC≈1,920 views19 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

И в продолжение про венчур — коллегам на заметку Нашел тут вот такую картинку от МИК/МВФ (который Московские венчурный фонд а не то, о чем вы подумали). Тут, конечно, нет непубличных сделок. А еще тут нет кибербезопасности — при том, что на 10 месте HR-tech с суммарным объемом 40 млн рублей за полугодье. Собственно, о чем это все говорит? Во-первых, по "разбросу" среди отраслей от года к году вместе с размером отр

👍74🔥4🤔2👨‍💻1🤡1

17 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC≈1,860 views32 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Сон венчура рождает ... интересное Тут прекрасная новость прошла Владелец ГК CorpSoft24 Константин Рензяев направил несколько сотен миллионов рублей на финансирование отечественного разработчика NGFW [Next-Generation Firewall - межсетевой экран нового поколения, обеспечивающий защиту корпоративной сети клиента от внешних и внутренних сетевых угроз] “Кодмастер”. Сам Рензяев через своего представителя сообщил, что в C

😁119👏6👍3🤡3

13 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,830 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

CyberLink фест Итак, 27 августа CyberLink фесте я расскажу о том как успешная атака на топ-менеджера становится недопустимым событием для их бизнеса! Совсем скоро Кибердом соберёт предпринимателей, фаундеров и управленческие команды на фестивале о технологиях, которые ускоряют бизнес. Мое выступление будет в рамках сессии - "Точка входа: как атака на предпринимателя становится атакой на компанию" Ведь личный теле

🔥6👍21👏1

12 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC≈1,610 views33 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Готов ли российский рынок к "дешевым" кибератакам? Тут на Forbes вышел прекрасный текст от Алексея Новикова из ПТ. Удивительно — там написано почти все то, о чем мы говорили с начала этого года. Даже на наше исследование ссылаются, что довольно мило. В общем мы согласны почти со всем — кроме ... вывода. > > > Инструментарий для кибератак стал легкодоступен, все равно что собрать машину в Lego по инструкции, а значи

🔥20👍65👏2

11 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC≈1,460 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Технооптимизм, прагматизм и неолуддизм Как мы уже писали — мы сделали прототип того, что можно назвать AI-SOC. Это было долго, трудно, большой по нашим меркам командой. Потом мы провели множество демо, где достаточно глубоко рассказывали о том, как именно мы хотим изменить подходы к защите в целом и к SOC в частности. Мы много раз старательно пытались объяснить: это не про «ИИ-хайп», а действительно найденный спосо

🔥14👍1

3 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈2,490 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ближайшие вебинары от нас: 1. Вебинар: Почему классический SOC перестает быть конкурентным преимуществом. Дата проведения: 05 августа 2026г. | 14.00 (МСК) Формат: онлайн Регистрация по ссылке👈🏻 05 августа в 14:00 Антон Бочкарев проведёт вебинар, где затронет тему классического SOC. Что разберем: Что, если классический SOC — это не лучшая практика, а самое дорогое наследие прошлого десятилетия? Больше аналитиков,

🔥41👍1

1 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈2,230 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @operations_cyberPhoto

Каждый раз когда ты открываешь бесплатное приложение с рекламой, где-то в рекламной системе фиксируется, что показ прошёл именно тут - в этом месте, на этом телефоне. А теперь представь, что кто-то может выкупить эти данные напрямую. Исследователи из Вашингтонского университета собрали рабочую слежку через обычный рекламный кабинет. Никакого взлома, только депозит 1000 долларов - и физическое перемещение человека от

👍20🔥86

1 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈2,030 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Шикарный технарский обзор на технологию AdInt, я о ней еще постараюсь рассказать на паре конф с упором на практику операторов связи.

👍1

29 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC≈3,070 views47 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Мы поймали агента OpenAI Знаете, про побег из песочницы агента OpenAI написали практически все! Как именно он из нее вылез - неизвестно, это могут быть как гениальные техники найденные ИИ, так и дурацкая мискофигурация самой песочницы, или даже умышленный выпуск в Интернет ради маркетинга и хайпа. Тут пруфов никаких нет, да и вряд ли они будут. Но вот что случилось дальше? Агент OpenAI побежал искать легкие цели

🔥33👍86

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @By3side. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@By3side edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 57,323 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“3side кибербезопасности” (@By3side), 10,222 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/By3side.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.