Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ❯❯̸⃟̸𝐂̷̰͢𝐀𝐋𝐀̷̸𝐕𝐀̷̸𝐍𝐈 𝐗̷̋†⃟𝐃

Channel

❯❯̸⃟̸𝐂̷̰͢𝐀𝐋𝐀̷̸𝐕𝐀̷̸𝐍𝐈 𝐗̷̋†⃟𝐃

@CALABANL696

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,069subscribers

+352 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004333269658
TypeChannel
Username@CALABANL696
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 4 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CALABANL696

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7171,0698936 August 2026 — 717 subscribers6 August 2026 — 717 subscribers6 August 2026 — 719 subscribers14 August 2026 — 840 subscribers22 August 2026 — 902 subscribers29 August 2026 — 941 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,020 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,047 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,069 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 41 days, net +352. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 664–1,122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 19:571,069+22
12 Sept 2026, 14:001,047+27
8 Sept 2026, 07:581,020+79
29 Aug 2026, 08:54941+39
22 Aug 2026, 05:37902+62
14 Aug 2026, 22:35840+121
6 Aug 2026, 18:55719+2
6 Aug 2026, 16:16717no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:07717first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52246551051433789355230.8%
custom 52899066062412498954727.8%
custom 53687911109257072103319.5%
custom 52806250358857060442716.0%
custom 536872882960494768874.14%
custom 520618895338376625131.78%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 8 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CALABANL696. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC111 views33 reactions4 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❯❯̸⃟̸𝐂̷̰͢𝐀𝐋𝐀̷̸𝐕𝐀̷̸𝐍𝐈 𝐗̷̋†⃟𝐃الولد الشقي М4ЛЫШКА ЛЮБ1Т Д1ЛЕРА, ДИЛ3РА,0Н ЛЮБ1Т ЕЕ ТЕЛ0 طفل يحب التاجر التاجر ي†⃟حبتحبمثير جᛝ⃟ᛝ⃝ᛝسدها نعم نعم خلع ملابسك الكلبة ──────────────────── ⓘ#𝐉𝐈𝐒𝐔𝐍𝐆༒︎ ⓘ#𝐁𝐖 𝐏ᛝ⃝ᛝ𝐇𝐎𝐓𝐎 𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐀𝐋 - взяли? + in the comment. It will be a pleasure

custom 528990660624124989514custom 53687911109257072107custom 53687288296049476886custom 52061889533837662513custom 52246551051433789353

6 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC184 views33 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

❯❯̸⃟̸𝐂̷̰͢𝐀𝐋𝐀̷̸𝐕𝐀̷̸𝐍𝐈 𝐗̷̋†⃟𝐃 جميلة П4ЧКА ЗА П4ЧКОЙ С7ЧКА العاهرة خطيرة ТАК 0ПАСНА حزمة بعد حزمة العاهرة خطير جᛝ⃟ᛝ⃝ᛝدا ولكن بط†⃟ريقة ما أنا لا تعطي اللعنة كنت ──────────────────── ⓘ#𝐇𝐘𝐔𝐍𝐉𝐈𝐍 ༒︎ ⓘ#𝐁𝐖 𝐏ᛝ⃝ᛝ𝐇𝐎𝐓𝐎 𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐀𝐋 - взяли? + in the comment. It will be a pleasure

custom 528990660624124989514custom 53687911109257072109custom 52246551051433789358custom 52806250358857060441custom 53687288296049476881

5 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC294 views67 reactions13 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❯❯̸⃟̸𝐂̷̰͢𝐀𝐋𝐀̷̸𝐕𝐀̷̸𝐍𝐈 𝐗̷̋†⃟𝐃 جميلة К1СКА BARB1E GIRL,П7ССИ С0К — Л1КЁР.GET UNDRESS3D باربي الفتاة كس سوف الافᛝ⃟ᛝ⃝ᛝراج عن عصير ال†⃟خمور خلع ملابسه لا تخجل لعبة ──────────────────── ⓘ#𝐅𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐗༒︎ ⓘ#𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐏ᛝ⃝ᛝ𝐇𝐎𝐓𝐎 𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐀𝐋 - взяли? + in the comment. It will be a pleasure

custom 522465510514337893525custom 528062503588570604416custom 528990660624124989516custom 536879111092570721010

4 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC294 views36 reactions4 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❯❯̸⃟̸𝐂̷̰͢𝐀𝐋𝐀̷̸𝐕𝐀̷̸𝐍𝐈 𝐗̷̋†⃟𝐃 جميلة СДЕЛАЛ Х1Т ДЛЯ EUR0VIS1ON, НАСПЕРМ1Л НА TRUE REL1GI0N صديقها يقطع عروق الديك الرᛝ⃟ᛝ⃝ᛝجل في الحم†⃟ار جعل زيت ل يوروفيجنناسبيرميل ──────────────────── ⓘ#𝐉𝐈𝐒𝐔𝐍𝐆 ༒︎ ⓘ#𝐁𝐖 𝐏ᛝ⃝ᛝ𝐇𝐎𝐓𝐎 𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐀𝐋 - взяли? + in the comment. It will be a pleasure

custom 522465510514337893516custom 528062503588570604410custom 53687911109257072107custom 52899066062412498953

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @CALABANL696. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“❯❯̸⃟̸𝐂̷̰͢𝐀𝐋𝐀̷̸𝐕𝐀̷̸𝐍𝐈 𝐗̷̋†⃟𝐃” (@CALABANL696), 1,069 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CALABANL696.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.