Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CANCEL TF

Channel

CANCEL TF

@CANCELTF369

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,963subscribers

+130 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001652731475
TypeChannel
Username@CANCELTF369
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CANCELTF369

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,81714,03113,92427 August 2026 — 13,833 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,827 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,817 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,859 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,875 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,892 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,898 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,889 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,031 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,961 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,963 subscribers13,96327 August 202610 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 14 days, net +130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,785–14,063 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 14:4113,963+2
7 Sept 2026, 08:4213,961-70
4 Sept 2026, 12:3814,031+142
3 Sept 2026, 00:1613,889-9
1 Sept 2026, 19:0813,898+6
31 Aug 2026, 17:2613,892+17
30 Aug 2026, 19:2313,875+16
29 Aug 2026, 21:3513,859+42
28 Aug 2026, 18:5413,817-10
27 Aug 2026, 18:1813,827-6
27 Aug 2026, 14:0013,833first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 21 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 13,963 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,080
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held37 (21 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total76,982
Reactions total1,640
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,640 reactions across 37 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1,13469.1%
26216.0%
😍1569.51%
👍392.38%
😎171.04%
💔90.549%
😢90.549%
🍓80.488%
😱40.244%
🔥20.122%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,640 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 37 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CANCELTF369. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC543 views55 reactionsread 2 September 2026

زندگی داخل ایران عالیه دلار 220 برق هم 4تا6 10تا12❤❤❤

42🤣7😍3💔1🔥1😢1

2 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC715 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026

فری فایر از جی تی ای بهتره💀😂

🤣171

2 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC713 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/7czIco3Kv1k?si=5GrT2UXJCJ7Sk10r

🤣71

2 Sept 2026, 01:01 UTC951 views50 reactionsread 2 September 2026

یه دقیقه بیدار شدم الان دوباره بخوابم سر ساعت 4:30 صبح برقو بردن🤣🤣🤣

🤣481👍1

1 Sept 2026, 19:10 UTC≈1,080 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtube.com/live/8tZZP0fhaVo?feature=share

4

1 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,270 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سایدتو مشخص کردی!

🤣25👍2

Signed AM6

1 Sept 2026, 01:31 UTC≈1,430 views56 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣55💔1

31 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,620 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026

برای اولین نفری که منو شناخت جم زدم😍🔥

😍241

29 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈2,360 views117 reactionsread 2 September 2026

گفتم عروسیمه دونیتم‌ نکردین ولی💔💔🙏

🤣107👍6🍓4

29 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈2,290 views110 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣1033👍2😎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @CANCELTF369. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CANCEL TF” (@CANCELTF369), 13,963 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CANCELTF369.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.