Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CBA 224 | W

Channel

CBA 224 | W

@CBA20244

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,519subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002109515183
TypeChannel
Username@CBA20244
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CBA20244

Growth

1,4931,5231,5085 September 2026 — 1,493 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,493 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,518 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,523 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,519 subscribers1,5195 September 202615 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,489–1,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 06:411,519-4
12 Sept 2026, 00:421,523+5
7 Sept 2026, 23:211,518+25
5 Sept 2026, 14:221,493no change
5 Sept 2026, 13:471,493first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
833.3%
👏520.8%
🏆416.7%
👍416.7%
🔥28.33%
❤‍🔥14.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jun 2026, 17:37 UTC765 views7 reactionsread 5 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

2🏆2🔥2👏1

Signed W

15 Jun 2026, 15:11 UTC685 views11 reactionsread 5 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍42🏆2👏2❤‍🔥1

Signed W

15 Jun 2026, 12:32 UTC573 views2 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Poll

Which evaluation methodology ranks solution alternatives specifically by calculating their relative closeness and geometric distance from both the ideal solution and the worst-case solution?

  1. A) TOPSIS Method47%
  2. B) Driver Tree Decomposition16%
  3. C) Sensitivity Analysis10%
  4. D) Balanced Performance Scorecard27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

Signed W

15 Jun 2026, 12:29 UTC365 views2 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Poll

Within the SCAMPER innovation methodology, which specific lens or provocation deliberately challenges fundamental assumptions by exploring completely opposite approaches?

  1. A) Substitute28%
  2. B) Adapt11%
  3. C) Eliminate8%
  4. D) Reverse53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏2

Signed W

15 Jun 2026, 09:43 UTC262 viewsread 5 September 2026
Poll

If a project milestone is missed by more than one week, within how many hours must the project sponsor be notified?

  1. A) Immediately44%
  2. B) Within 12 hours4%
  3. C) Within 24 hours47%
  4. D) Within 48 hours4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed W

15 Jun 2026, 09:41 UTC234 views1 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Poll

To ensure that a critical event message reaches a recipient regardless of their current activity, protocols suggest using simultaneous email, text message, and phone calls. This method is called:

  1. A) Selective Disclosure23%
  2. B) Intranet Repositories10%
  3. C) Redundant Notification48%
  4. D) Hypothesis-Driven Branching19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

Signed W

15 Jun 2026, 09:40 UTC211 views0 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Poll

If a primary recipient does not acknowledge a critical notification within specified timeframes, the system should automatically do what?

  1. A) Delete the alert to avoid fatigue.5%
  2. B) Escalate the issue to secondary contacts through the escalation hierarchy.85%
  3. C) Downscale the severity level from critical to warning.5%
  4. D) Transfer the data into the Best Practice Library.5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed W

15 Jun 2026, 09:37 UTC193 viewsread 5 September 2026
Poll

When threshold-setting is configured "too sensitively", it generates excessive alerts that stakeholders learn to ignore. This phenomenon is known as:

  1. A) Organizational Amnesia8%
  2. B) Analysis Paralysis11%
  3. C) Alert Fatigue77%
  4. D) Selective Disclosure3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed W

15 Jun 2026, 09:35 UTC176 views0 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Poll

The After-Action Review (AAR) methodology, which relies on 4 core questions to evaluate what happened versus what was intended, was originally borrowed from:

  1. A) Lean Manufacturing Systems18%
  2. B) Management Consulting Firms34%
  3. C) Military Practices47%
  4. D) Aerospace Engineering2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed W

15 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTC174 viewsread 5 September 2026
Poll

Which communication mode is proactively delivered to stakeholders (e.g., via direct emails or presentations) without requiring action from the recipient to access it?

  1. A) Pull Communication11%
  2. B) Multi-Channel Journey5%
  3. C) Push Communication79%
  4. D) Selective Disclosure5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed W

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CBA20244. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 13 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Jun 2026, 12:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz77 voters

Which evaluation methodology ranks solution alternatives specifically by calculating their relative closeness and geometric distance from both the ideal solution and the worst-case solution?

  1. A) TOPSIS Method47%
  2. B) Driver Tree Decomposition16%
  3. C) Sensitivity Analysis10%
  4. D) Balanced Performance Scorecard27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jun 2026, 12:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz72 voters

Within the SCAMPER innovation methodology, which specific lens or provocation deliberately challenges fundamental assumptions by exploring completely opposite approaches?

  1. A) Substitute28%
  2. B) Adapt11%
  3. C) Eliminate8%
  4. D) Reverse53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jun 2026, 09:43 UTCAnonymous Quiz70 voters

If a project milestone is missed by more than one week, within how many hours must the project sponsor be notified?

  1. A) Immediately44%
  2. B) Within 12 hours4%
  3. C) Within 24 hours47%
  4. D) Within 48 hours4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jun 2026, 09:41 UTCAnonymous Quiz62 voters

To ensure that a critical event message reaches a recipient regardless of their current activity, protocols suggest using simultaneous email, text message, and phone calls. This method is called:

  1. A) Selective Disclosure23%
  2. B) Intranet Repositories10%
  3. C) Redundant Notification48%
  4. D) Hypothesis-Driven Branching19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jun 2026, 09:40 UTCAnonymous Quiz62 voters

If a primary recipient does not acknowledge a critical notification within specified timeframes, the system should automatically do what?

  1. A) Delete the alert to avoid fatigue.5%
  2. B) Escalate the issue to secondary contacts through the escalation hierarchy.85%
  3. C) Downscale the severity level from critical to warning.5%
  4. D) Transfer the data into the Best Practice Library.5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jun 2026, 09:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz62 voters

When threshold-setting is configured "too sensitively", it generates excessive alerts that stakeholders learn to ignore. This phenomenon is known as:

  1. A) Organizational Amnesia8%
  2. B) Analysis Paralysis11%
  3. C) Alert Fatigue77%
  4. D) Selective Disclosure3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 15 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قناة جامعة الامام عبدالرحمن
@Damam2030 · 32,071
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CBA 224 | W” (@CBA20244), 1,519 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CBA20244.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.