Channel
@CCCR_1986
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
779subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001612750995 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CCCR_1986 |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CCCR_1986 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:09 | 779 | -2 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 781 | -4 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 785 | -1 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 786 | no change |
| 29 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 786 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
97 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 24 | 24.7% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 17.5% | |
| 🤡 | 14 | 14.4% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 13.4% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 12.4% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 7.22% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 5.15% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 3.09% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2025 to 13 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CCCR_1986. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2025 to 13 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡️Один из террористов, который напал на синагогу и церковь в прошлом году, работал на одном из предприятий Дербента. Большое расследование журналистов о коррупции в Дагестане.
Signed SSSR_1986
Затока, Одесса. На пляже хохлы подрываются на минах которые сами же и установили.
🤯3😢2🔥1
Signed SSSR_1986
Трамп: Русские были бы в Киеве через 4 часа, если бы ехали по шоссе. Но российский генерал решил проехать через сельскохозяйственные угодья. «Я не знаю, кто этот генерал, но, зная Владимира, его, скорее всего, уже нет на свете», — отметил Трамп. Другие заявления: — Трамп заявил, что может выйти из дипломатии по Украине по итогам встречи с Путиным. — Трамп в преддверии встречи с Путиным заявил, что попросит его за…
🤡6❤3
Signed SSSR_1986
Очень важная информация. Я прошу адекватных подписчиков поделиться ею с как можно большим числом людей. 📱 Подписывайтесь на «ШИРИНОВ» #история
🔥7❤1
Signed SSSR_1986
Зеленский признал, что Украина не может вернуть занятые российской армией территории военным путём, и необходимо прибегнуть к дипломатическим вариантам Для тех кто разбирается - это было очевидно еще до начала СВО. Просто не нужно было провоцировать Россию на силовой метод обеспечения своей безопасности. Любой президент, в том числе Трамп, понимают Россию, ее право на свою безопасность и способы обеспечения этой без…
Signed SSSR_1986
Трамп согласится на встречу с Путиным только в том случае, если российский лидер также проведёт переговоры с Зеленским, заявили в Белом доме.
🤡6
Signed SSSR_1986
🥵 Было жарко
🔥4
Signed SSSR_1986
Трампу напомнили о насильственной мобилизации в ВСУ. Во время интервью Деду задали прямой вопрос: почему США продолжают финансировать армию, где мужчин похищают с улиц, принудительно отправляют на фронт, а на передовую попадают даже люди с инвалидностью и психическими отклонениями, включая молодого человека с синдромом Дауна? Журналист напомнил, что Владимир Зеленский подписал закон, разрешающий мобилизовать гражда…
❤2🤡2
Signed SSSR_1986
⚡️Владимир Путин назвал ОАЭ одним из подходящих мест для встречи с Дональдом Трампом.
Signed SSSR_1986
Главные требования Путина - не территории, а контроль над Украиной, - NYT Согласно аналитикам, на которых ссылается The New York Times, Кремль хочет не столько формальных территориальных уступок, сколько: ➖Отказы Украины от вступления в НАТО; ➖Ограничение ее военных возможностей; ➖Возвращение Украины в сферу влияния Москвы. Другие требования, по мнению экспертов, могут быть предметом для дальнейших переговоров.
👍3
Signed SSSR_1986
❗️Трамп сегодня в 23:00 выступит с обращением В ближайшие 36 часов Трамп должен принять решение о новых санкциях против РФ.
❤1
Signed SSSR_1986
Хорошо сказано. Правильно. Крепко. Главное Евгений не боится это говорить в эфир
💯12😁2
Signed SSSR_1986
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CCCR_1986. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СССР_1986” (@CCCR_1986), 779 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CCCR_1986.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.