Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 成都怡红院选妃榜

Channel

成都怡红院选妃榜

@CD_yhyhk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

41,231subscribers

+15,495 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002880177336
TypeChannel
Username@CD_yhyhk
Description成都怡红院: https://t.me/CD_yhy
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CD_yhyhk

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

25,59241,23133,411.58 August 2026 — 25,736 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,713 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,661 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,681 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,678 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,665 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,691 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,668 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,632 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,623 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,594 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,610 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,600 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,592 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,647 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,631 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,668 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,592 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,818 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,762 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,794 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,877 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,862 subscribers5 September 2026 — 26,907 subscribers7 September 2026 — 27,140 subscribers10 September 2026 — 27,130 subscribers12 September 2026 — 27,088 subscribers14 September 2026 — 27,188 subscribers16 September 2026 — 27,226 subscribers18 September 2026 — 27,349 subscribers25 September 2026 — 28,980 subscribers3 October 2026 — 30,578 subscribers8 October 2026 — 31,813 subscribers12 October 2026 — 33,298 subscribers14 October 2026 — 34,100 subscribers15 October 2026 — 34,376 subscribers16 October 2026 — 34,577 subscribers17 October 2026 — 34,823 subscribers18 October 2026 — 35,124 subscribers19 October 2026 — 35,441 subscribers20 October 2026 — 35,721 subscribers21 October 2026 — 35,754 subscribers22 October 2026 — 36,128 subscribers23 October 2026 — 36,400 subscribers24 October 2026 — 36,716 subscribers26 October 2026 — 37,116 subscribers26 October 2026 — 37,295 subscribers28 October 2026 — 37,631 subscribers29 October 2026 — 38,237 subscribers30 October 2026 — 38,594 subscribers31 October 2026 — 38,976 subscribers1 November 2026 — 39,254 subscribers2 November 2026 — 39,742 subscribers3 November 2026 — 40,106 subscribers4 November 2026 — 40,440 subscribers5 November 2026 — 40,785 subscribers6 November 2026 — 41,004 subscribers7 November 2026 — 41,135 subscribers8 November 2026 — 41,231 subscribers8 August 20268 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net +15,495. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,246–43,577 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 12:0541,231+96
7 Nov 2026, 04:2841,135+131
6 Nov 2026, 07:1041,004+219
5 Nov 2026, 08:1740,785+345
4 Nov 2026, 09:4640,440+334
3 Nov 2026, 12:1740,106+364
2 Nov 2026, 10:0139,742+488
1 Nov 2026, 08:0539,254+278
31 Oct 2026, 06:5938,976+382
30 Oct 2026, 07:5638,594+357
29 Oct 2026, 06:5938,237+606
28 Oct 2026, 02:0737,631+336
26 Oct 2026, 23:0137,295+179
26 Oct 2026, 01:0037,116+400
24 Oct 2026, 22:3136,716+316
23 Oct 2026, 21:1636,400+272
22 Oct 2026, 18:3936,128+374
21 Oct 2026, 11:3035,754+33
20 Oct 2026, 06:0135,721+280
19 Oct 2026, 07:1735,441first reading

Engagement

165 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 148 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.33%
avg views ÷ 41,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
548
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.214%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 165 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held165 (7 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total26,299
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,880
Videos
≈308
Links
≈951

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 53s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 54 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8794.6%
💩33.26%
👍11.09%
👎11.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 165 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 165 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 165 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CD_yhyhk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 165 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 48 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC224 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

📊 0条车评 写报告 好评 0% | 人照 | 服务 中评 0% | 颜值 | 态度 差评 0% | 身材 | 环境 怡红院选妃榜 【编 号 】:#M866 【花 名 】:#米娅 【地 区 】:#大观地铁站 【课 费 】:700/p 1200/pp #7/12 【标 签 】: #颜值 #态度 【车 牌 】: @Mia03778 【硬件详情】: 25,170,f罩杯 【软件详情】:基本的三件套加提出的要求都会满足,不过分的要求都可以 【综合评分】:8.5 【总结评价】: 新疆美女,大只马 身材好,态度好,情绪价值到位 胸大管饱,像女朋友一直给你体贴的照顾和服务! 【验证报告】:# 报告1 报告2 你爱你的林黛玉,我爱我的杨贵妃!

❤1

7 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC362 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

📊 0条车评 写报告 好评 0% | 人照 | 服务 中评 0% | 颜值 | 态度 差评 0% | 身材 | 环境 怡红院选妃榜 【编 号 】:#M865 【花 名 】:#喜儿 【地 区 】:#李家沱 【课 费 】:#7p 12pp 【标 签 】:#御姐 【车 牌 】:@Yxcdmu55 【硬件详情】: 年龄23身高162体重105罩杯D 【软件详情】:陪洗 69 舌吻 过水 【综合评分】:8.8 【总结评价】:嫩妹耍多了可以来试试这个老师 老师服务可以 老师长得好看就是肚子上肉肉的有纹身 水超多 还是推荐 【验证报告】:# 报告1 报告2 你爱你的林黛玉,我爱我的杨贵妃!

7 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC313 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

📊 0条车评 写报告 好评 0% | 人照 | 服务 中评 0% | 颜值 | 态度 差评 0% | 身材 | 环境 怡红院选妃榜 【编 号 】:#M864 【花 名 】:#徐冬冬 【地 区 】:#衣冠庙 【课 费 】:600/p 1000/pp #6/10 【标 签 】:#服务车 #大胸 【车 牌 】:@yezi030305 【硬件详情】: 30出头 大胸 腰腹有赘肉 乳晕较大 【软件详情】:毒龙 69 胸推 按摩 【综合评分】:8分 【总结评价】:到了没有等地方很好找,停车方便,进门了会帮你放水洗澡,擦水 ,胸大,服务很好,各种服务都有,女上有力,动得快,还可以口爆,吹的人很舒服,整体还是很不错的 【验证报告】:# 报告1 报告2 你爱你的林黛玉,我爱我的杨贵妃!

6 Nov 2026, 16:08 UTC415 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

📊 0条车评 写报告 好评 0% | 人照 | 服务 中评 0% | 颜值 | 态度 差评 0% | 身材 | 环境 怡红院选妃榜 【编 号 】:#M863 【花 名 】:#小蕾 【地 区 】:#保利锦外小户 【课 费 】:700/p 1100/pp #7/11 【标 签 】:#御姐 #大🐻 #服务控 #粉穴 【车 牌 】:@jileixiaojie 【硬件详情】: 28左右 168 55 d杯 【软件详情】:独🐉绝活,陪洗,口莎,深喉等等 【综合评分】:9分 【总结评价】:老师口活很好,逼逼很粉,周边毛毛剃的很干净,水多,毒龙也是一绝,值得体验的,打算下次还要回锅。喜欢大胸御姐服务控的不容错过。 【验证报告】:# 报告1 报告2 你爱你的林黛玉,我爱我的杨贵妃!

6 Nov 2026, 10:53 UTC389 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

📊 0条车评 写报告 好评 0% | 人照 | 服务 中评 0% | 颜值 | 态度 差评 0% | 身材 | 环境 【编 号 】:#M862 【花 名 】:#二妹 【地 区 】:#锦江区 【课 费 】:600/p 800/pp #6/8 【标 签 】:#少妇车#态度 【车 牌 】:@amumdh 【硬件详情】: 30+ 163 115 C+ 【软件详情】:裸口、调情、帮洗、各种姿势爱爱、丝袜高跟鞋 【综合评分】:7.5 【总结评价】:适合喜欢大胸的,高挑的,少妇车;但是服务没有亮点,技术一般 【验证报告】:# 报告1 报告2 你爱你的林黛玉,我爱我的杨贵妃!

6 Nov 2026, 07:18 UTC410 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

📊 0条车评 写报告 好评 0% | 人照 | 服务 中评 0% | 颜值 | 态度 差评 0% | 身材 | 环境 怡红院选妃榜 【编 号 】:#M861 【花 名 】:#欲梦 【地 区 】:#锦江区 【课 费 】:800/p 1300/pp #8/13 【标 签 】:#御姐 #锦江区 【车 牌 】: @yumeng0888 【硬件详情】: 23 160/85 【软件详情】:洗吹做浅蛇 【综合评分】:8.5 【总结评价】:老师颜值较高,属于甜御类型,情绪价值高,身材苗条,胸部略小,适合想体验女友感的兄弟 【验证报告】:# 报告1 报告2 你爱你的林黛玉,我爱我的杨贵妃!

6 Nov 2026, 06:24 UTC333 views0 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

📊 9条车评,综合分 8.9 好评 100% | 人照 8.9 | 服务 9.0 中评 0% | 颜值 8.8 | 态度 9.0 差评 0% | 身材 8.9 | 环境 8.9 👆 【点击查看评价】 怡红院选妃榜 【编 号 】:#M860 【花 名 】:#安琪 【地 区 】:#火车南站 【课 费 】:600p /1000pp #6/10 【标 签 】:#御姐 【车 牌 】:@anqi2026 【硬件详情】: 年龄27身高164体重105罩杯b➕ 【软件详情】:陪洗 69 舌吻 过水 【综合评分】:8.3 【总结评价】:嫩妹耍多了可以来试试这个老师 老师服务可以 服务车 温柔御姐 丰乳肥臀 服务多切专业不敷衍 【验证报告】:# 报告1 报告2 你爱你的林黛玉,我爱我的杨贵妃!

5 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC471 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🎰 成都怡红院给狼友们送福利了 📮 参与条件: 🎫 加入-成都会所 | SPA 按摩 丝足 🎫 加入-成都怡红院选妃榜 🎫 加入-成都怡红院 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 5 条 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 599套餐升级699套餐劵 × 3 💰️ 66优惠劵 × 2 💰️ 88优惠券 × 2 💰️ 半价卷 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 48小时内兑奖 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年11月10日 22时45分00秒

4 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

📊 0条车评 写报告 好评 0% | 人照 | 服务 中评 0% | 颜值 | 态度 差评 0% | 身材 | 环境 怡红院选妃榜 【编 号 】:#M859 【花 名 】:#阳阳 【地 区 】:#成华区 【课 费 】:600/p 1100/pp #6/11 【标 签 】:#成华区 #嫩妹 #态度车 【车 牌 】:@mmya520 【硬件详情】: 年龄18 身高165 体重90 罩杯b. 【软件详情】:🐍,陪洗,做,口 【综合评分】:硬件+软件综合得8.5 【总结评价】:颜值可以,态度不错的嫩妹 【验证报告】:# 报告1 报告2 你爱你的林黛玉,我爱我的杨贵妃!

4 Nov 2026, 08:28 UTC448 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_109111213

4 Nov 2026, 02:25 UTC533 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

📊 0条车评 写报告 好评 0% | 人照 | 服务 中评 0% | 颜值 | 态度 差评 0% | 身材 | 环境 怡红院选妃榜 【编 号 】:#M858 【花 名 】:#左左 【地 区 】:#东郊记忆 【课 费 】:600/p 1000/pp #6/10 【标 签 】:#御姐 #无纹身 #态度车 #服务车 #自聊 #6p 【车 牌 】: @zuozuo1133 【硬件详情】: 26左右,身高163,体重105,身材微胖,前凸后翘,风韵犹存。大胸C+柔软饱满。蝴蝶逼逼,又紧又湿。 【软件详情】:洗,口,啪啪,🐍,69,毒龙,胸推,吸皮,ab面,阴推,按摩 【综合评分】:9 【总结评价】:温柔御姐,贤妻良母型,说话温柔客气。很是热情,态度极好。妹妹前凸后翘,丰乳肥臀。服务多且专业不敷衍。爱爱姿势配合反馈很好 【…

❤1

2 Nov 2026, 07:05 UTC873 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

📊 0条车评 写报告 好评 0% | 人照 | 服务 中评 0% | 颜值 | 态度 差评 0% | 身材 | 环境 怡红院选妃榜 【编 号 】:#M857 【花 名 】:#CD小七 【地 区 】:#动物园 【课 费 】:600/p 1100/pp #6/11 【标 签 】:#嫩妹 #6p #混聊 #纹身 #成华区 #动物园 【车 牌 】: @xiaoqi200803 【硬件详情】: 19,身高172,体重96,胸C+,自然下垂,柔软手感佳。蝴蝶逼逼,外褐里粉,毛毛多。 【软件详情】:洗,口,啪啪,69,🐍,毒龙 【综合评分】:9.5 【总结评价】:人照一致,身材高挑修长,皮肤小麦色。前凸后翘。胸C+,自然下垂,饱满柔软。蝴蝶逼逼,毛毛多。妹妹全身敏感,体验很好,征服感拉满 【验证报告】:# 报告1 报告2…

Showing the 12 most recent of 165 posts we hold for @CD_yhyhk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@CD_yhyhk edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @CD_yhyhk as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
1 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“成都怡红院选妃榜” (@CD_yhyhk), 41,231 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CD_yhyhk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.