Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 成都鲍光台|神父|唤醒蝈蝻

Channel

成都鲍光台|神父|唤醒蝈蝻

@CDbgt110

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,405subscribers

+29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001650841262
TypeChannel
Username@CDbgt110
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CDbgt110

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,37614,47614,4266 August 2026 — 14,376 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,378 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,404 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,406 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,409 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,411 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,417 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,429 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,457 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,466 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,476 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,471 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,475 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,469 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,463 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,455 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,450 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,449 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,457 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,467 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,472 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,471 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,464 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,449 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,465 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,456 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,439 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,417 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,405 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,424 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,405 subscribers14,4056 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,361–14,491 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:2214,405-19
15 Sept 2026, 19:5514,424+19
14 Sept 2026, 03:4114,405-12
12 Sept 2026, 09:1914,417-22
10 Sept 2026, 07:3614,439-17
6 Sept 2026, 23:3614,456-9
4 Sept 2026, 09:4114,465+16
1 Sept 2026, 15:2714,449-15
31 Aug 2026, 18:1814,464-7
30 Aug 2026, 21:1314,471-1
29 Aug 2026, 22:5414,472+5
28 Aug 2026, 22:1614,467+10
27 Aug 2026, 22:1414,457+8
26 Aug 2026, 23:3314,449-1
25 Aug 2026, 21:2514,450-5
25 Aug 2026, 00:5514,455-8
23 Aug 2026, 13:0814,463-6
22 Aug 2026, 02:3714,469-6
20 Aug 2026, 22:4614,475+4
19 Aug 2026, 22:0214,471first reading

Engagement

192 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.63%
avg views ÷ 14,405 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 192 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held192 (4 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total62,136
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 59s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 42 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5990.8%
👍46.15%
🥰23.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 192 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 192 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:44 UTC550 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#前两天就说了风大 还是有这么多人被抓怎么就听不进去呢

2 Sept 2026, 14:14 UTC531 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#铃铛 👉加入内部群获取鸡婆原相机照片: 点击此处加入内部群:https://t.me/CDbgt110/7972 查看鸡婆原相机果照和视频及老师最真实评价和联系方式:👈 👉神父唯一联系方式 @SF_GOD_bot 👉全成都第一个完全站在狼友角度的小狼 👉鲍光台主频道: https://t.me/+32DMFHR-SgAyYjhh 👉鲍光台备用: https://t.me/+ZFyY7SkPt6wxNjM5 👉吃瓜讨论群:https://t.me/+jX9u7w80wnYxOGY1 👉吃瓜备用群:https://t.me/+QiKBg7Z_G5syNTZl

1 Sept 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,210 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

【花名】:#米苏 【时间】:2026.09.01 【位置】:大源地铁站,世豪广场附近 【价格】:700p 【身高】:165左右 【年龄】: 20左右 【人照】:9分 【罩杯】:A 【服务】:共浴,口,69,蛇(课表里有水中萧,实际上没有) 【打分】:6.5分(满分10) 【过程】:妹子贵州人,A杯排骨小萝莉,性格偏直率,嗓音略粗有点反差,真人和视频不太像,真人脸更瘦一些,脸上有一两个美人痣,两侧有小虎牙笑起来好看,皮肤黄色轻微偏白色,腿腿圆润手感好。bb是白虎没有毛毛,外褐内粉 开门后妹子非常热情,欢迎,牵手亲亲,情绪价值蛮好,交完水费一起去洗澡,妹子给我简单洗了一下下面,就去床上了,亲亲抱抱69..(此处省略一万字),妹刚开始口的时候很舒服,后面口的用力有点猛,丁丁被牙齿咬痛了,给妹子口了好一会,开始正戏,妹里面紧度适中,比较润,爱爱的时候随便舌吻,不过女上体力不太行没几下就得换我来,换了三四次姿势后有感觉了逐渐加速出货。 如

2

1 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC≈1,240 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

需要查档查个人信息查鸡婆查主播实名的兄弟进群 报神父名字打九折 全网低价 https://t.me/Shandianchadang888 @iiisosiii

1 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

地区:#成都 名字:#吒儿 标签:#实拍 #课拍不露连视频 #吴涛车 👇👇👇👇 点击预览部分实拍福利 👉https://t.me/chengducheku/187 👇👇👇👇 点击此处加入内部群 查看全部露脸果照和车牌: 👉 https://t.me/CDbgt110/7972 👈 👉神父唯一联系方式 @SF_GOD_bot

1 Sept 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,120 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

地区:#成都 名字:#小淑 标签:#实拍 #课拍不露连视频 #吴涛车 👇👇👇👇 点击预览部分实拍福利 👉https://t.me/chengducheku/186 👇👇👇👇 点击此处加入内部群 查看全部露脸果照和车牌: 👉 https://t.me/CDbgt110/7972 👈 👉神父唯一联系方式 @SF_GOD_bot

1 Sept 2026, 06:51 UTC≈1,300 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

从房间追出来追着我骂,进去话也不说的,我走的时候说她态度不好,她出来追着我要动手一样 妥妥精神小妹 #骂人的女生是 #可儿 700一次 #拍视频的是 #罗特无情 去工兵白嫖的 罗特投稿给神父表示打死都不能删视频

1

1 Sept 2026, 06:50 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#骂人的女生是 #可儿 700一次 #拍视频的是 #罗特无情 去工兵白嫖的 罗特投稿给神父表示打死都不能删视频

1 Sept 2026, 06:46 UTC≈1,240 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026

从房间追出来追着我骂,进去话也不说的,我走的时候说她态度不好,她出来追着我要动手一样 妥妥精神小妹

Showing the 12 most recent of 192 posts we hold for @CDbgt110. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“成都鲍光台|神父|唤醒蝈蝻” (@CDbgt110), 14,405 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CDbgt110.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.