Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CF中转IP

Channel

CF中转IP

@CF_NAT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,139subscribers

+125 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001680434412
TypeChannel
Username@CF_NAT
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CF_NAT

Growth

11,01111,13911,0757 August 2026 — 11,014 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,011 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,012 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,017 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,029 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,032 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,044 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,053 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,057 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,063 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,073 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,083 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,089 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,099 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,107 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,109 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,115 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,124 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,130 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,139 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 23 days, net +125. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,992–11,158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 03:4411,139+9
28 Aug 2026, 03:2811,130+6
27 Aug 2026, 05:4311,124+9
26 Aug 2026, 04:2211,115+6
25 Aug 2026, 01:5411,109+2
23 Aug 2026, 15:5311,107+8
22 Aug 2026, 01:3511,099+10
20 Aug 2026, 21:4311,089+6
19 Aug 2026, 19:4311,083+10
18 Aug 2026, 22:2411,073+10
18 Aug 2026, 00:5211,063+6
16 Aug 2026, 22:1811,057+4
15 Aug 2026, 17:0511,053+9
14 Aug 2026, 01:4411,044+12
12 Aug 2026, 17:4511,032+3
11 Aug 2026, 15:3211,029+12
10 Aug 2026, 14:2411,017+5
8 Aug 2026, 18:0211,012+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:0611,011-3
7 Aug 2026, 05:0311,014first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 15 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

456 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍33773.9%
8117.8%
🔥153.29%
🥰91.97%
😁40.877%
🤡40.877%
🤣30.658%
👏10.219%
💩10.219%
🤔10.219%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 456reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC≈6,160 views33 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

用今天嫖来的claude max 20x逆向了warp-svc,搞了个小玩具。看到类似更完善的项目usque,不过轮子还是自己造的圆。😁

23🤡4😁4💩1🔥1

1 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC≈9,880 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

win gui和 windows版本x-tunnel源码

👍9

1 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC≈9,890 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

做了一个带tun模式分流的客户端,无缝替换之前的版本。

15

8 Jun 2026, 06:09 UTC≈20,400 views31 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

极简版的CF优选IP

👍244🤣3

17 Apr 2026, 10:00 UTC≈19,000 views97 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

x-tunnel 源码,献给有需要的人。没啥技术含量,只希望这种应用思路激发更多的创作空间。

👍925

17 Apr 2026, 09:51 UTC≈16,900 views111 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

cfnat 源码,没啥藏着掖着的。没技术含量的东西,贡献给有需要的人。

👍101🥰91

26 Mar 2026, 07:32 UTC≈20,200 views22 reactionsread 29 August 2026

刚刚重新构建了一下cfdata app,修复了一下之前测速地址失效的问题。原先的签名文件弄丢了,重新生成的。需要先卸载旧的app才能安装上这个新的。

11👍11

26 Mar 2026, 00:12 UTCviews —

CF中转IP pinned «x-tunnel 发行版程序 x-tunnel windows客户端 x-tunnel 安卓apk 这些资源都已经更新了,有需要的更新一下»

25 Mar 2026, 13:20 UTC≈17,900 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

x-tunnel 全面更新,与旧版本不再兼容,需要同时更新服务端 废除旧版本的逻辑,新版本引入smux

🔥106👍4🤔1

6 Feb 2026, 04:32 UTC≈21,300 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

新增从github在线获取维护的gfwlist,配置好代理服务器后点击即可获取完整列表。 添加完全匹配搜索

👍214👏1

5 Feb 2026, 14:08 UTC≈19,900 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍121🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @CF_NAT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 202,578 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

免费vpn梯子机场翻墙技术
@FreeVPN8 · 44,201
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CF中转IP” (@CF_NAT), 11,139 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CF_NAT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.