用今天嫖来的claude max 20x逆向了warp-svc,搞了个小玩具。看到类似更完善的项目usque,不过轮子还是自己造的圆。😁
❤23🤡4😁4💩1🔥1

Channel
@CF_NAT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,139subscribers
+125 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001680434412 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CF_NAT |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CF_NAT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 11,139 | +9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 11,130 | +6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 11,124 | +9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 11,115 | +6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 11,109 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 11,107 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 11,099 | +10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 11,089 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 11,083 | +10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 11,073 | +10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 11,063 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 11,057 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 11,053 | +9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 11,044 | +12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 11,032 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 11,029 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 11,017 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 11,012 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 11,011 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 11,014 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 15 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
456 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 337 | 73.9% | |
| ❤ | 81 | 17.8% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 3.29% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 1.97% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.877% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 0.877% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.658% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.219% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.219% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.219% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 456reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
用今天嫖来的claude max 20x逆向了warp-svc,搞了个小玩具。看到类似更完善的项目usque,不过轮子还是自己造的圆。😁
❤23🤡4😁4💩1🔥1
win gui和 windows版本x-tunnel源码
👍9
做了一个带tun模式分流的客户端,无缝替换之前的版本。
❤15
app源码
👍25❤5
极简版的CF优选IP
👍24❤4🤣3
x-tunnel 源码,献给有需要的人。没啥技术含量,只希望这种应用思路激发更多的创作空间。
👍92❤5
cfnat 源码,没啥藏着掖着的。没技术含量的东西,贡献给有需要的人。
👍101🥰9❤1
刚刚重新构建了一下cfdata app,修复了一下之前测速地址失效的问题。原先的签名文件弄丢了,重新生成的。需要先卸载旧的app才能安装上这个新的。
❤11👍11
CF中转IP pinned «x-tunnel 发行版程序 x-tunnel windows客户端 x-tunnel 安卓apk 这些资源都已经更新了,有需要的更新一下»
x-tunnel 全面更新,与旧版本不再兼容,需要同时更新服务端 废除旧版本的逻辑,新版本引入smux
🔥10❤6👍4🤔1
新增从github在线获取维护的gfwlist,配置好代理服务器后点击即可获取完整列表。 添加完全匹配搜索
👍21❤4👏1
File, posted without a caption
👍12❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @CF_NAT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 202,578 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CF中转IP” (@CF_NAT), 11,139 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CF_NAT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.